Welcome to the Philosophy Forums! If you are not a member, please join the forums now. It's completely free! If you are a member, please log in.

Search found 59 matches

Return to advanced search

  • Author
  • Message
Jackowens

June 16th, 2010, 3:29 am

Dear whitetrshsoldier, In reply to your post of 6/15/10 (#48): (quote not shown) It sounds like you haven't read my posts very carefully; I've already conceded that point 3 times. What this jumble seems to decoct to is this: Let's say that the 12-year-old girl, having copulated with the 30-year-old ...
Jackowens

June 15th, 2010, 4:37 pm

Dear Scott, In reply to your post of 6/15/10 (#46): (quote not shown) Between "it could be" and "it could not be", that doesn't get us very far. How about pointing out any empirical error that you see? (quote not shown) I'm not sure I understand that sentence. The error I see --a...
Jackowens

June 15th, 2010, 4:27 am

Dear Scott, In reply to your post of 6/14/10 (#44): (quote not shown) Then presumably I'm involved in a fallacy or contradiction. What is it? (Jack:) "Am I mistaken?" (quote not shown) Then presumably I'm involved in a fallacy or contradiction. What is it? Regards, Jack
Jackowens

June 14th, 2010, 4:34 am

Dear Scott, In reply to your post of 6/13/10(#42): Jackowens wrote: I don't understand that. If, instead of the girl's saying "yes", she said the opposite, "no" (or "maybe"), that would have been consensual? (quote not shown) No what? Presumably the girl can say "y...
Jackowens

June 13th, 2010, 6:38 pm

Dear Scott, In reply to your post of 6/13/10 (#40): Jackowens wrote: If by consensual you mean did the girl say "yes", the answer is obvious: it was consensual. (quote not shown) I don't understand that. If, instead of the girl's saying "yes", she said the opposite, "no"...
Jackowens

June 13th, 2010, 5:35 pm

Dear Scott, In reply to your post of 6/12/10 (#38): (quote not shown) Sorry. (quote not shown) It's not really an either/or matter. If by consensual you mean did the girl say "yes", the answer is obvious: it was consensual. On the other hand, if by consensual you are talking about the lega...
Jackowens

June 12th, 2010, 8:21 pm

Dear Scott, In reply to your post of 6/12/10 (#36): (quote not shown) Is a dog incompetent to decide? For instance, we can assume that a person putting a plate of food in front of a hungry dog has consented in his own mind to feed it. It is then up to the dog's decision, rather than consent, as to w...
Jackowens

June 11th, 2010, 5:41 am

Dear Scott, With further rumination on this matter it has struck me that your objections are artificial and we need to return to a practical approach to the controversy. I propose that we discard the idea of competence of consent and simply feed the dog what it want/needs as is customarily done. If ...
Jackowens

June 10th, 2010, 12:51 am

Dear Abacab, In reply to your post of 6/9/10 (#9): Since this thread holds some interest for you, let me try this out for your take on it: Force-feeding, as the term itself indicates, necessarily involves force. That distinction is borne out by any dictionary. Feeding a normal, healthy dog does not ...
Jackowens

June 9th, 2010, 7:52 pm

Dear Scott, In reply to your post of 6/9/10 (#27): Jackowens wrote: A. Feeding a hungry dog, and B. Feeding (force-feeding) a dog that has eaten all that it wants --and needs-- and struggles to avoid the ingestion of more food. (quote not shown) But no force is used in A. If I claim that A does not ...
Jackowens

June 9th, 2010, 6:25 am

Dear Scott: In reply to your post of 6/8/10 (#24): (quote not shown) Yes, I would too. But you seem to be making the same distinction I am between two actions on your and my parts. In other words ostensibly we're in agreement. The actions are: A. Feeding a hungry dog, and B. Feeding (force-feeding) ...
Jackowens

June 8th, 2010, 4:44 pm

Dear Scott, In reply to your post of 6/8/10 (#22): Scott wrote: When a competent adult has sex with or gives food to an incompetent being it is rape (i.e. non-consensual sex) or force-feeding (non-consensual ingesting) respectively regardless of how desiring or seemingly willing the incompetent bein...
Jackowens

June 8th, 2010, 4:36 am

Dear Scott, In reply to your post of 6/7/10 (#17): (quote not shown) That's a start. (quote not shown) But that does not show an empirical error on my part. All you're doing is what you've been doing repeatedly: giving me your belief with nothing to support it in the sense of showing me that my disa...
Jackowens

June 7th, 2010, 5:50 pm

Dear Scott, In reply to your post of 6/7/10 (#15): (quote not shown) I see that and pretty much all of what follows as little more, but in slightly different words, than what you've already posted. Where does that leave us? Apparently with the implication that I have a mistaken belief, that I'm guil...
Jackowens

June 7th, 2010, 6:17 am

Dear Friends, To Scott: Now that Wonder has posted, I can post the reply to your post of 65/10 (#9) on this thread where it belongs instead of on the "Same Sex Marriage" thread. (quote not shown) According to my Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary , "force-feed" is "to feed ...
Next

Return to advanced search

Can't find what you are looking for? Try our custom Google search of this website.