HexHammer wrote:I consider myself a superior philosopher, as I use logic and reason, with a great knowledge and differ immensly from the common philosopher with a bit of neurology, psychology and physics.
It comes down to understanding the basic principles that most others are blatantly unaware of.
I consider you to be an intellectually insecure ****.
But hey, there's clearly no reasoning to that comment, just "neurology, psychology and physics"...so what does it matter?
Quite the contrary my friend, I'v proven my security, when one goest up against a big boss of a big newspaper, the entire chief of staff, lawyers and what not. I don't even have a formal education, yet with reason and logic can defeat them.
However, it seems that you can only preform parrotspeeches, as you don't even know when to apply "insecurity" to a behaviour.