Morality should be based on the stronger argument/reason, just like everything else. Period.

Dodaive wrote:Thank you vexed that is really what I needed to hear, I would like to hear about the period of time that you transition from the sports fan state to the philosopher state, anything typical of this transition time?

There is no transition really, one of my favorite parts of being a sports fan is to argue about them. Unfortunately I can't say the stereotype is ungrounded, many sports fans are in fact incapable of coming up with a legitimate argument.

(quote not shown) (quote not shown) I'm not sure exactly what you mean Belinda, but I think you're leaning towards a pantheistic view which I will admit pretty much destroys the argument. Other than that, I think the only way that statement could be non-axiomatic would be to completely reject the co...

(quote not shown) I consider myself both an avid sports fan and an avid philosopher. I have no doubt that avid sports fans are capable of philosophical discussion, the only person outside of my university I know that is both willing and capable of doing so is also an avid sports fan. (quote not show...

I'm not exactly an expert on the topic, but from what I know they already knew some stuff with general relativity was way off. It's incompatible with quantum mechanics. They still use it to make large scale predictions accurately, so I can't imagine this has the type of impact everyone seems to thin...

(quote not shown) But Tom's parents created Tom and Tom's parents originated on Earth. My oak tree's seed created my oak tree and my oak tree originated on Earth. By the way my oak tree is self seeded , I did not deliberately plant it. Etc. You're taking my argument which goes from creator originati...

If god created the earth, it is impossible for god to have originated on earth
if a thing is something which did not originate on earth, it is by definition an extraterrestrial
therefore if god created the earth, god must be an extraterrestrial

problems? i see none