There is no such animal as a False Theory;

A Theory is a Concept, a Conjecture, Speculation, not a perception.

Theory is not Fact, is not True, is not Reality, is simply a Theory.

It is the thought that a Theory is True, Fact, a Reality, that is False,
not the Theory itself.

If you can consider Theory to be the Knowledge of a Reality, your Knowleddge of Reality is Absolutely Bad Knowledge,
Absolutely Bad Knowledge having a Dual Quality, being Duplicitous, deceptive, Guileful, is False Knowledge, Absolutely Bad Knowledge believed to be Absolutely Good Knowledge.

Theory works in reverse; theoretically speaking you find a known fact, Empirical evidence of Reality, and then Create a Theory as to the cause, the Cause not being a know fact, being a conjecture, Speculation, being a Creation, being an original product of the mind; Theory being born of Pure Reason, meaning Reason alone without having any Empirical Evidence of any actual cause; Theory being born of Reason alone is a Creation, an original product of the Mind, is pure conjecture, speculation, if simply born of the Imagination, the actual, true, cause being unknown.

Theoretically speaking a Theorist is grasping at straws, using his imagination, reason alone in his attempt to find a cause for some known fact, empirical reality.

The Idea that the Universe that the Reality of Everything, is made up of a Single Thing is
not a new Theory, is an ancient Concept.

Know this for sure, Theory as created, is not believed to be a fact, the Truth, a Reality, by the Theorist that created the Theory.

The real problem with the Theory of the Big Bang is that the evidence offered up as proof
of the Big Bang is itself based upon the Theory of the Expanding Universe.

Red Shift (known fact), the Theoretical Cause of Red shift being an Expanding Universe, an expanding Universe being pure Speculation, being born of Reason alone, being a product of the Mind, being a Creation, has been Randomly Generated by the Imagination.

The Theory of the Big Bang alone with the Theory of an Expanding Universe is an abomination, is pure Hog Wash.

Steve 3007



Post Number:#79 Yesterday, 5:24 am

Hi James,



Yet, I know without question that "particles" not only exist, but no universe can ever exist without particles automatically forming. It isn't an option.


Could you give me your understanding of the meaning of the word "particle"? (I've asked Xris for his definition, but, surprisingly, given that word's central importance to the theme of this thread, he didn't give it.)

Wayne wrote;

I have a thing about what I think is a misuse of the word Particle.

Particle is used as a catch all word.

I would reserve the word particle to mean Primordial Atom;

Primordial:
1. constituting a beginning; giving origin to something derived or developed; original; elementary:
primordial forms of life.
2. Embryol. first formed.
3. pertaining to or existing at or from the very beginning: primordial matter.

Some believe that the Universe is made of a Single Thing.

I see a Particle as being the minutest thing in the Universe, as being an Individual Infinitely Finite Indivisible Singularity having no relative, numerical value, as having a numerical value of Zero-->O.

A Singularity of One is divisible, plus being relative; if a Singularity of One had no relative numerical value it would have the numerical value of Zero.

I see a Particle as being an Individual Infinitely Finite Indivisible Singularity having not relative, numerical value as having a numerical value of Zero ---->O

-- Updated February 20th, 2012, 11:54 pm to add the following --

dparrott
Post Number:#93 Yesterday, 4:09 pm

In defense of the BB theory and as a person with faith in God, I'll say that I have not heard any logical explanation for the BB theory being false.

In order for a Theory to be a False Theory, a Theory would have to be mistaken to be the True, a Fact, a Reality.

You can not have a false Lie, you can however have a false true which would simple be a Lie.

The word False is resurved for False Fact, False Absolutely Good Knowledge, said Know, being Absolutely Bad Knowledge mistaken to be Absolutly Good Knowledge.

False Good Knowledge being Absolutely Bad Knowledge has dual quality, is Duplicitous, Guileful, Deceptive,
is a Lie, Knowledge having a Dual Quality being the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Xris wrote;

Post Number:#116 Today, 6:03 am

The best comment of the last three day, I am a christian and I believe in the big bang. Belief has become synonymous with certainty, when you put two dodgy concepts together they appear to support each other.


wayne wrote;

Here's one for you, I am an Atheist that believe in God.

dparrott

You may not have said it, but I was responding as though you had

------------------------------------------------------------------------
dparrott wrote:

In defense of the BB theory and as a person with faith in God, I'll say that I have not heard any logical explanation for the BB theory being false.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thinking that you has said it, I addressed my post to you, however I was not talking about you.

My response, being an Ahteist that believes in God, was to a person, to anyone, that believe in the Big Bang and Believes in God.

-- Updated February 26th, 2012, 2:21 pm to add the following --

Posts: 789
Joined: October 14th, 2009, 4:48 am



Re: The false theories that give birth to false philosophy

James S Saint;



Posts: 789
Joined: October 14th, 2009, 4:48 am



Re: The false theories that give birth to false philosophy




Post Number:#133 February 23rd, 2012, 1:13 pm

One of those "false theories that led to false philosophies" is the theory of relativity.
The false philosophy that it led to was, "there is no Truth fore ALL things are relative".

NoThing, not Time, not Space, not Motion, not even God was relative before The Moment of Creation,
God Being a Singularity alone in the Emptiness prior to The Moment of Creation.


Post Number:#133 February 23rd, 2012, 1:13 pm

One of those "false theories that led to false philosophies" is the theory of relativity.
The false philosophy that it led to was, "there is no Truth fore ALL things are relative".

JPost Number:#133 February 23rd, 2012, 1:13 pm

One of those "false theories that led to false philosophies" is the theory of relativity.
The false philosophy that it led to was, "there is no Truth fore ALL things are relative".ames S Saint

Nothing was relative prior to The Moment of Creation, not even God.

-- Updated February 27th, 2012, 12:14 am to add the following --

Posts: 14
Joined: January 27th, 2012, 8:32 pm



Re: The false theories that give birth to false philosophy






Post Number:#159 less than a minute ago

JPost Number:#133 February 23rd, 2012, 1:13 pm
James S Saint wrote;

One of those "false theories that led to false philosophies" is the theory of relativity.
The false philosophy that it led to was, "there is no Truth fore ALL things are relative".

Wayne wrote;othing was relative prior to The Moment of Creation, not even God.