-1-==I will study and study and then again study harder your words, o Rr6, for you have proven me so wrong in so many instances... your great mind which dwarves mine is a shining beacon for me any time I want to get convinced I am not as great and smart as you are.
More repeated false projections on your part. Typical of those who have ego based mental blockages.
r6--
r6--123, ABC that's how easy Universe/God can be. imho"""
and then you can turn around in a flash and claim that you did not write this as this quote of yours shows:
I made no such statement denying my statement as you state here above. You still making false projections. Ego based mental blockages to truth is unbecoming of you and any humans in general. Waste of valuable mind and energy. imho
r6--""" "-1-==Dear Rr6; 123, ABC is still to complex for me. If god is simply, 123, ABC...."
You misunderstand since I did not even post it."""
Thats correct statement, I did not present you with my 123, ABC scenario, only that I have one that is as easy as 123, ABC. Your confused, misunderstand, have false projections that are resultant of ego. imho
It indeed takes a great mind to be able to deny simple truths that can be verified otherwise in an instant, and be satisfied that he is still right about it.
You have not offered us any simple truths. You have copy some text and posted it, along with misunderstandings and false projections.
Just please tell me one thing, and one thing only: since you so bravely ignore the principle of the excluded middle, what is it that makes you believe that two things that are completely equivalent are two separate things? This is probably the most important lesson you could imbue me at present time. If you say, A==B, and I say B therefore can be discarded from the system, then what is in your mind that so vehemently and adamantly makes you insist that B can't be discarded?
I have no idea what it is your think your going on about, It is certainly irrelevant to any of my comments to you, as stated. Your confused, misunderstand have ego based mental blockages to truth. imho
You also have a great quality which I lack, and wish you could teach me how to have it. Consider the following quote:
""" "natural occupied space, then what is it that separates us and the material / energy / spacial / time-driven universe from God? this is a genuine question."
r6--Your still confused. Humans are not separate from nature, occupied space, energy or Universe/God. Not sure where you get these false ideas."""
Thou so marvellously, inimitably, brilliantly misunderstood my question, by parsing it illogically and not according to the rules of syntax. You thought (mistakenly, o Master) that I contrasted US against REALITY;
Now your bringing a new term--- reality ---- into the conversation.
Code: Select all
whereas if you re-read the sentence, then even you, with your so much more superior mind than mine, in your estimate, will see that I included US in the set of thing things in the UNIVERSE, and then I contrasted that whole lot against what you called God. A simple way of guiding the eye would be to consider that separation is between elements that are separated in the sentence by the preposition "from" instead of by the connective "and".
Huh? Sorry dude, you following some zig-zagging path of irrational, illogical content that I cannot follow. Your also presenting more false projections, and not what Ive stated.
So, as you can see, I have three things to learn from your greatness: 1. How to instantly forget what I have said, much like you have shown you have instantly forgot what you had said two posts up; 2. How to be haughty and state of to you unknown, unstated theories that they must be necessarily not logical and much inferior to your logical explanations, without even reading them; and 3. How to misread completely straight and clear sentences and interpret them in a way that serves your argument, but only due to the fact that you can't or you wouldn't parse properly a relatively simple sentence.
I don't see you as have learned anything, forgot anything of offer anything of any relevant significance.
These are the things in your great argumenting or debating style that ALAS! I will never be able to make my own, because I basically frown on them, I find them haughty and insulting to others, generally illiterate, and altogether not worthy of myself, because they are degrading others, which would help lower my dignity and that of my debating partner.
How you can do these things and still go home with a clear conscience at the end of the day is a complete mystery to me. You blindly contradicted yourself; you argue against well-established and logical tenets of classical logic; you deliberately or else due to lack of skill wouldn't properly parse a sentence in your own language for meaning; and you on top of that declare that of two unstated theories, yours must a priori be more logical and more sensible or rational than mine.
You take the cake, my friend.
Please share when you have some rational, logical common sense, that is actually based on my comments as stated and not a bunch of repeated false projections. It would also help if it was significantly relevant to anything I've stated. Sadly it is not.
r6