Polar opposites
- Hnnh2000
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: August 20th, 2017, 4:59 am
Polar opposites
-
- Posts: 3601
- Joined: February 28th, 2014, 4:50 pm
Re: Polar opposites
The horseshoe theory in political science asserts that the far left and the far right, rather than being at opposite and opposing ends of a linear political continuum, in fact closely resemble one another, much like the ends of a horseshoe. The theory is attributed to French writer Jean-Pierre Faye. (Wiki)
-
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various
Re: Polar opposites
Newton's Third Law would be an apt analogy.Hnnh2000 wrote:Is everything that's polar opposite exactly the same? For example, if everyone is special then no one is special, and if no one is special then everyone is special. One end of the spectrum meets the other end of the spectrum in the same spot, as if philosophy is a circle. Iv'e been wondering this a lot lately, does anyone know what I mean?
In reality it is not exactly the same but in dynamic complementarity and entangled.
Note the Yin- Yang model that demonstrate dynamic complementarity and entanglement.
One critical philosophical consideration is how to reconcile the unity within the duality.
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Polar opposites
Their are different kinds of antonyms within languages. Someone and no one are a particular kind of antonym whilst rich and poor is another kind of antonym.Hnnh2000 wrote:Is everything that's polar opposite exactly the same? For example, if everyone is special then no one is special, and if no one is special then everyone is special. One end of the spectrum meets the other end of the spectrum in the same spot, as if philosophy is a circle. Iv'e been wondering this a lot lately, does anyone know what I mean?
"relational opposites" are things like buyer/seller, or husband/wife, where the existence of one implies the other.
"complimentary pairs" are things like alive/dead, present absent, or someone/no one, where the presence of one implies the absence of the other.
"gradable antonyms" are things like big/small, rich/poor, or happy/sad, where "not happy" does not necessarily mean "sad".
There are some more unique cases too if you wish to look them up? Autoantonyms (I think there is a more popular term for these, but I've forgotten what it is!) and antiautonyms.
Hope you find this at least interesting if not helpful
- Ranvier
- Posts: 772
- Joined: February 12th, 2017, 1:47 pm
- Location: USA
Re: Polar opposites
- -1-
- Posts: 878
- Joined: December 1st, 2016, 2:23 am
Re: Polar opposites
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Polar opposites
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7984
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Polar opposites
Great post. When I think of opposites, I generally think of what you would call gradable antonyms. In other words I don't think of husband vs wife.Burning ghost wrote:Their are different kinds of antonyms within languages. Someone and no one are a particular kind of antonym whilst rich and poor is another kind of antonym.Hnnh2000 wrote:Is everything that's polar opposite exactly the same? For example, if everyone is special then no one is special, and if no one is special then everyone is special. One end of the spectrum meets the other end of the spectrum in the same spot, as if philosophy is a circle. Iv'e been wondering this a lot lately, does anyone know what I mean?
"relational opposites" are things like buyer/seller, or husband/wife, where the existence of one implies the other.
"complimentary pairs" are things like alive/dead, present absent, or someone/no one, where the presence of one implies the absence of the other.
"gradable antonyms" are things like big/small, rich/poor, or happy/sad, where "not happy" does not necessarily mean "sad".
There are some more unique cases too if you wish to look them up? Autoantonyms (I think there is a more popular term for these, but I've forgotten what it is!) and antiautonyms.
Hope you find this at least interesting if not helpful
- -1-
- Posts: 878
- Joined: December 1st, 2016, 2:23 am
Re: Polar opposites
Popular opposites: Jesus-Buddha; Moulin Rouge-Sistine Chapel; Justin Beaver - Frank Zappa.
Plural opposites: Beatles vs. Mormon Tabernacle Choir; Red Army vs Luftwaffe; seven-eleven team, vs. Men in Black.
Pro-prular opposites: Rodney King and gang vs SF police. Early Christians in the Colosseum, vs. hungry lions. The Mets vs the Yankees.
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Polar opposites
In all other usage, the phrase is metaphorical - employed for imagery, not accuracy.
- Phorever
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: August 28th, 2017, 1:02 pm
Re: Polar opposites
You are leaving out one important part that reflects life which is STATE. What state is the world in at the time of measurement? If it's all one's then it can't be all zeros but life is zeros and ones or else there is no information.Hnnh2000 wrote:Is everything that's polar opposite exactly the same? For example, if everyone is special then no one is special, and if no one is special then everyone is special. One end of the spectrum meets the other end of the spectrum in the same spot, as if philosophy is a circle. Iv'e been wondering this a lot lately, does anyone know what I mean?
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023