Virtues and the individual
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: September 12th, 2017, 6:03 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
- Albert Tatlock
- Posts: 183
- Joined: October 15th, 2017, 3:23 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
What if all the people in the room happened to be equally virtuous and all simultaneously attempted to throw themselves onto the grenade? What do you imagine would be the outcome of the inevitable chaos?
In reality, of course, quite the opposite would occur as I think you are being unrealistically optimistic if you think there would always be at least one person willing to jump on the grenade.
No offence, Eduk, but I don't think there has been much thought put into your thought experiment.
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Virtues and the individual
- Albert Tatlock
- Posts: 183
- Joined: October 15th, 2017, 3:23 pm
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
Some questions about your thought experiment:
Does each generation of each group get a new room with a new grenade?
Do virtuous people always throw themselves on the grenade and non-virtuous people always not?
Do they breed before, after or during the grenade unpleasantness? (Or all three?)
If a virtuous person breeds with a non-virtuous person is the resulting offspring 50% virtuous? Or does it mean there's a 50% chance that he/she is completely virtuous?
If we can resolve these questions, it would be interesting to run the numbers. Clearly groups with no virtuouses would go extinct. But I wonder if groups with all virtuouses would do just as well as those with only one? I guess it would depend on exactly how the throwing yourself on a grenade thing works. If they all run to throw themselves on the grenade, does only the fastest one die? If so, there might be selective pressure for slowness. You might end up with a group of people who are all virtuous but whose running speed has become synchronized with the fuse time of the grenade. Interesting.
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: September 12th, 2017, 6:03 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
- Albert Tatlock
- Posts: 183
- Joined: October 15th, 2017, 3:23 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
I imagine that would be necessary as the remains of the previous group could be quite off putting to the new group and could well deter them from proceeding with the experiment. As for the grenade, they tend not to be reusable.
I wouldn't think it just a matter of virtue, lack of intelligence has undoubtedly a role to play in all this.Do virtuous people always throw themselves on the grenade and non-virtuous people always not?
It would have to be before, grenades are a very effective form of contraception.Do they breed before, after or during the grenade unpleasantness? (Or all three?)
I think natural selection would tend to favour those that ran away from, rather than towards the grenade.You might end up with a group of people who are all virtuous but whose running speed has become synchronized with the fuse time of the grenade.
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
Your example is indeed coherent and it quite obviously results in the virtuous person dying. But it doesn't seem to consider anything about inheritance. Do these four people reproduce at all? If they do, do they do it before or after (or during) this act of self-sacrifice?
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
I had a good laugh at your first three reply lines. As for this one:
Yes, but i think it's a condition of the experiment that in that scenario they'd all die whilst scrambling against the walls of the room or attempting to hide behind each other. I suppose Eduk's point was to suggest that groups in which at least somebody, by chance, doesn't do that and "takes one for the team" would survive, so virtuousness/stupidity (depending on your point of view) would survive by group-selection. As you've pointed out, reproducing after being blown apart by a grenade has quite severe problems, so the virtuous/stupid member of the group would survive long enough to reproduce. But he/she would reproduce with a non-virtuous/sensible person. So in the next generation there's a 50% chance of the group going extinct. And so on.I think natural selection would tend to favour those that ran away from, rather than towards the grenade.
So perhaps eventually virtuousness would be bred out and all the groups would simply go extinct.
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: September 12th, 2017, 6:03 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
That was the conclusion I came to in my first response to Eduks problem.
I don't have any idea as to incorporating reproduction in a way that would make sense.I was just trying to demonstrate a non virtuous person's advantage. However, I would say that a person who is not virtuous is more likely to reproduce, and reproduce more frequently than someone who is virtuous. Consider the bear that eats their cubs to survive, and reproduce later. Of course if a mother were to eat her children she would not be considered virtuous but she would live to reproduce again.
Albert Tatlock
Outside of Eduks example would you say virtuousity and intelligence are negatively correlated?
- Albert Tatlock
- Posts: 183
- Joined: October 15th, 2017, 3:23 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
I'm afraid the level of thought you are prepared to devote to this thought experiment leaves me not only puzzled but also at a disadvantage when it comes to analysing what the outcome would be, as I am not prepared to pay anywhere near as much attention to it's detail. This being the case, I'm willing to accept that your understanding of all its implications is superior to mine.Steve3007 wrote: ↑December 10th, 2017, 1:52 pm Yes, but i think it's a condition of the experiment that in that scenario they'd all die whilst scrambling against the walls of the room or attempting to hide behind each other. I suppose Eduk's point was to suggest that groups in which at least somebody, by chance, doesn't do that and "takes one for the team" would survive, so virtuousness/stupidity (depending on your point of view) would survive by group-selection. As you've pointed out, reproducing after being blown apart by a grenade has quite severe problems, so the virtuous/stupid member of the group would survive long enough to reproduce. But he/she would reproduce with a non-virtuous/sensible person. So in the next generation there's a 50% chance of the group going extinct. And so on.
- Albert Tatlock
- Posts: 183
- Joined: October 15th, 2017, 3:23 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
Not at all. In fact, I, myself, am an example of virtuousness and intelligence successfully coexisting.Maxcady10001 wrote: ↑December 10th, 2017, 1:58 pm Albert Tatlock
Outside of Eduks example would you say virtuousity and intelligence are negatively correlated?
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: September 12th, 2017, 6:03 pm
Re: Virtues and the individual
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7990
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Virtues and the individual
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023