Desire
- Present awareness
- Posts: 1389
- Joined: February 3rd, 2014, 7:02 pm
Re: Desire
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2837
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Desire
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Desire
True enough, but I would argue that suffering is not a universal negative. Thus desire is also not something to be avoided.Present awareness wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2018, 1:33 am According to Buddha, desire is the root cause of all suffering. If we do not have what we desire, we suffer and if we do achieve what we desire, we will suffer when it’s gone. Since all is impermanent, any attachment to things, will cause suffering when it disappears.
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: September 12th, 2017, 6:03 pm
Re: Desire
The former sounds better to me. The idea of all organic matter struggling to grow and become more. This first idea is very much like Nietzsche's Will to Power. I cannot think of an instance of this idea being false. I certainly would say the desire to achieve more in life in the broadest context is an organic process.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Desire
It sort of depends on what you mean by your red statement. The broadest meaning of organic desire is to procreate ie to have a greater genetic representation over time. Though it is true that in Modern society, genetic representation has been substituted out for toy acquisition (due to advertising/mass media influences) and at the lowest end of the scale moving from abject poverty to a subsistence level of "achievement" leads to broader/greater genetic representation. Problem is that in the Modern era, going from subsistence to middle income to high wealth leads to less and less genetic representation due to women's education. Clearly this was not an issue when the patterns of life were laid down multiple millennia ago.
-
- Posts: 251
- Joined: May 2nd, 2017, 10:10 am
Re: Desire
-
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various
Re: Desire
According to Buddhism, it is not desire per se that is the a root cause of all sufferings.Present awareness wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2018, 1:33 am According to Buddha, desire is the root cause of all suffering. If we do not have what we desire, we suffer and if we do achieve what we desire, we will suffer when it’s gone. Since all is impermanent, any attachment to things, will cause suffering when it disappears.
The critical root cause [interdependent with others] of dukkha [human problem or suffering] is ignorance [avidya]. Thus 'Right Knowledge' is critical to eliminate ignorance.
In this case it is the ignorance of the nature and limits of 'desire' i.e. "a strong feeling of wanting to have something or wishing for something to happen."
If one is stuck in a room that is lack of oxygen, one would 'desire' to breathe fresh air to relieve physical sufferings.
Thus there are degrees to 'desire.'
Note Aristotle on 'anger' which is applicable to 'desire';
- Anybody can become angry - that is easy, but to be angry with the right person and to the right degree and at the right time and for the right purpose, and in the right way - that is not within everybody's power and is not easy. - Aristotle
-
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various
Re: Desire
Agree and yes 'innate' and 'inherent.'
This inherent drive is evident from the empirical evidences of human history.
- Present awareness
- Posts: 1389
- Joined: February 3rd, 2014, 7:02 pm
Re: Desire
Spectrum wrote: ↑January 5th, 2018, 4:25 amAccording to Buddhism, it is not desire per se that is the a root cause of all sufferings.Present awareness wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2018, 1:33 am According to Buddha, desire is the root cause of all suffering. If we do not have what we desire, we suffer and if we do achieve what we desire, we will suffer when it’s gone. Since all is impermanent, any attachment to things, will cause suffering when it disappears.
The critical root cause [interdependent with others] of dukkha [human problem or suffering] is ignorance [avidya]. Thus 'Right Knowledge' is critical to eliminate ignorance.
In this case it is the ignorance of the nature and limits of 'desire' i.e. "a strong feeling of wanting to have something or wishing for something to happen."
If one is stuck in a room that is lack of oxygen, one would 'desire' to breathe fresh air to relieve physical sufferings.
Thus there are degrees to 'desire.'
Note Aristotle on 'anger' which is applicable to 'desire';
Thus generally 'desire' is not an issue [as dukkha] until such desires are turned to the extreme of craving, lust and the likes that is linked to extreme emotions and lack of impulse control.
- Anybody can become angry - that is easy, but to be angry with the right person and to the right degree and at the right time and for the right purpose, and in the right way - that is not within everybody's power and is not easy. - Aristotle
There is a difference between desire and need. The need for oxygen, food or water are not desires, for we die without them. Once our needs for the necessities of life have been met, we may then turn our attention to desire.
All desires, including the desire to eliminate desire, are based on ignorance. This “Right Knowlege” which you speak of, must come from within, for knowlege without personal experience, is false knowlege.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14995
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Desire
Thanks Max, that's what I was thinking. Life always wants to expand its size, scope and influence, be it via girth, wealth, reproduction, learning or memetics. To that end life on Earth has done an extraordinary job over the last few billion years.Maxcady10001 wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2018, 1:30 pmThe former sounds better to me. The idea of all organic matter struggling to grow and become more. This first idea is very much like Nietzsche's Will to Power. I cannot think of an instance of this idea being false. I certainly would say the desire to achieve more in life in the broadest context is an organic process.
-
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various
Re: Desire
Generally there is a difference between 'need' and 'desire' but they overlap where 'need' becomes 'desire.'Present awareness wrote: ↑January 6th, 2018, 1:03 amThere is a difference between desire and need. The need for oxygen, food or water are not desires, for we die without them. Once our needs for the necessities of life have been met, we may then turn our attention to desire.Spectrum wrote: ↑January 5th, 2018, 4:25 am In this case it is the ignorance of the nature and limits of 'desire' i.e. "a strong feeling of wanting to have something or wishing for something to happen."
If one is stuck in a room that is lack of oxygen, one would 'desire' to breathe fresh air to relieve physical sufferings.
Thus there are degrees to 'desire.'
All desires, including the desire to eliminate desire, are based on ignorance. This “Right Knowlege” which you speak of, must come from within, for knowledge without personal experience, is false knowlege.
In the ordinary case, all humans need oxygen. But in the case I specified one is stuck in a room [with many people, etc] and there is a lack of oxygen. In such a not-normal situation, the desperation for a need turned to be desire when this is encompassed with emotions, i.e. fear of death.
In many cases, people are invoked with 'desire' therefrom cravings even after their basic needs are met, e.g. in cases of obesity.
- Freudian Monkey
- Posts: 57
- Joined: December 7th, 2017, 3:14 am
Re: Desire
I'm actually rather interested to hear more about Buddhism's concept of self-improvement. To me meditation and other mental and physical exercises Buddhists do seem like self-improvement techniques that aim to gain more thorough control over one's thoughts, desires and impulses. To me this kind of pursuit for control over one's internal reality can also be seen as a desire to obtain Power, at least if by Power we mean one's ability to cause change to his internal or external reality. So when a Buddhist desires to obtain a more thorough control over his internal reality, he desires for Power. Is this somehow in opposition to the Buddhist ideal of getting rid of all attachments? Mental exercise and self-denial can also be seen as something one can get attached to, can it not? Or is the goal only to get rid of all attachments to material possessions and such?Present awareness wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2018, 1:33 am According to Buddha, desire is the root cause of all suffering. If we do not have what we desire, we suffer and if we do achieve what we desire, we will suffer when it’s gone. Since all is impermanent, any attachment to things, will cause suffering when it disappears.
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2837
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Desire
Buddhism has one and only one purpose, which is moksa, or liberation. I think you have to look at it this way: Right now I am interested in what I'm writing. Afterward, I will probably be dwelling on this or that, my need for a new computer, how I dislike someone in politics, and so forth. Buddhism says that anything at all that you bring to mind is a kind pf captivity. Consider: who decided that I would think about politics? Actually, it just came to mind and took me away and I followed obediently. The first step is, don't let this happen. To be liberated you have to understand the nature of your captivity, which is the attachments that possess you in the actual moments of your lived life. And thoughts are not abstractions: they are feeling-toned as I once read it put. They are part of what science calls your central nervous system. So, it is not the mere cessation of thought, it is the taking of thoughts and their infused feelings and appetites and desires and loathings, and so on; and ending these.Freudian Monkey:
'm actually rather interested to hear more about Buddhism's concept of self-improvement. To me meditation and other mental and physical exercises Buddhists do seem like self-improvement techniques that aim to gain more thorough control over one's thoughts, desires and impulses. To me this kind of pursuit for control over one's internal reality can also be seen as a desire to obtain Power, at least if by Power we mean one's ability to cause change to his internal or external reality. So when a Buddhist desires to obtain a more thorough control over his internal reality, he desires for Power. Is this somehow in opposition to the Buddhist ideal of getting rid of all attachments? Mental exercise and self-denial can also be seen as something one can get attached to, can it not? Or is the goal only to get rid of all attachments to material possessions and such?
For me, real Buddhist meditation is not just stilling the mind. It is ending the non volitional cycle of thinking itself, and this takes place right at the "place" in your conscious awareness where it is all produced: put your attention to the base of your conscious existence, where thought and feeling rise up at the very point of origin, where nerves create experience itself. This is where air hunger has its origin, where your most primordial sense of being here at all has it origin. Very interesting. If you are diligent, attachments will fall away more and more and something dormant within will show itself.
Not for everyone.
If you just want make friends and influence people better, just go to your local meditation center. Helpful? Sure.
- Freudian Monkey
- Posts: 57
- Joined: December 7th, 2017, 3:14 am
Re: Desire
This is a very interesting description, but I would still like to hear further clarification about whether the pursuit of control over one's internal reality can also be considered an attachment. In other words, are mental exercises to gain control over one's mental functions in opposition to the Buddhist teaching, since they are something one has to exercise to acquire? Is the pursuit of liberation also something that can become an attachment? What is the right way to approach moksa then if one cannot get too attached to the acquisition of control over his/her mental processes?Hereandnow wrote: ↑January 14th, 2018, 12:45 pm
Buddhism has one and only one purpose, which is moksa, or liberation. I think you have to look at it this way: Right now I am interested in what I'm writing. Afterward, I will probably be dwelling on this or that, my need for a new computer, how I dislike someone in politics, and so forth. Buddhism says that anything at all that you bring to mind is a kind pf captivity. Consider: who decided that I would think about politics? Actually, it just came to mind and took me away and I followed obediently. The first step is, don't let this happen. To be liberated you have to understand the nature of your captivity, which is the attachments that possess you in the actual moments of your lived life. And thoughts are not abstractions: they are feeling-toned as I once read it put. They are part of what science calls your central nervous system. So, it is not the mere cessation of thought, it is the taking of thoughts and their infused feelings and appetites and desires and loathings, and so on; and ending these.
For me, real Buddhist meditation is not just stilling the mind. It is ending the non volitional cycle of thinking itself, and this takes place right at the "place" in your conscious awareness where it is all produced: put your attention to the base of your conscious existence, where thought and feeling rise up at the very point of origin, where nerves create experience itself. This is where air hunger has its origin, where your most primordial sense of being here at all has it origin. Very interesting. If you are diligent, attachments will fall away more and more and something dormant within will show itself.
Not for everyone.
If you just want make friends and influence people better, just go to your local meditation center. Helpful? Sure.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023