help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: April 9th, 2018, 3:57 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Franz Kafka
- Contact:
help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
- ThomasHobbes
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
As for the rest of your question. You need to understand the word theory. You are using it as if it were some kind of myth or a speculation.
Theories are ways of looking. And they assert that in given circumstances, consequences will follow. Good theories are well constructed and logical. They predict outcomes, and retrodict past events.
Marx's views hold good for the conditions which he observed about the relations of capital. They hold good for his time, and his ideas still pertain and are used throughout economic thinking. Their predictive value is only lessened to the extent that we now use money in the differently and financial vehicles are used which did not exist. Mostly that just changes the speed of changes.
There is no distinction between theory and science. ALL science is theory.
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: April 9th, 2018, 3:57 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Franz Kafka
- Contact:
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
okThomasHobbes wrote: ↑June 12th, 2018, 4:24 am Marxism is a theory of economic history.
As for the rest of your question. You need to understand the word theory. You are using it as if it were some kind of myth or a speculation.
Theories are ways of looking. And they assert that in given circumstances, consequences will follow. Good theories are well constructed and logical. They predict outcomes, and retrodict past events.
Marx's views hold good for the conditions which he observed about the relations of capital. They hold good for his time, and his ideas still pertain and are used throughout economic thinking. Their predictive value is only lessened to the extent that we now use money in the differently and financial vehicles are used which did not exist. Mostly that just changes the speed of changes.
There is no distinction between theory and science. ALL science is theory.
another question:
Marxists say that the dialectical materialism is methodology?
I do not understand what they mean by methodology. (Is it a theory or a methodology?)
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
There are different ways to look for solutions, or to work out ideas, or to organize information. It's a statement of operative procedure.
When a scientist decides to conduct a series of experiments to test a theory, he first sets out what the experiment is supposed to show; what question it's intended to answer. Then he states how he will go about it, the way data will be collected and the criteria by which those data will be evaluated. That's his methodology.
Similarly, when a historical researcher, a statistician, a sociologist or pedagogue presents a paper on any subject in his area, he states at the outset what he intended to find out and how he went about finding it out.
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: April 9th, 2018, 3:57 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Franz Kafka
- Contact:
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
Yes, I understand that, there are several methods, comparative, descriptive, and the historical method, but is the material dialectical is a method?Alias wrote: ↑June 12th, 2018, 12:12 pm Methodology is the way in which one approaches a problem.
There are different ways to look for solutions, or to work out ideas, or to organize information. It's a statement of operative procedure.
When a scientist decides to conduct a series of experiments to test a theory, he first sets out what the experiment is supposed to show; what question it's intended to answer. Then he states how he will go about it, the way data will be collected and the criteria by which those data will be evaluated. That's his methodology.
Similarly, when a historical researcher, a statistician, a sociologist or pedagogue presents a paper on any subject in his area, he states at the outset what he intended to find out and how he went about finding it out.
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
All that really means is: Look at the subject, not as a singular thing, but as part of a bigger process. Every proposition has a counter-proposition. In each encounter, one idea or solution wins over its opposite, but is changed in the process. That altered proposition will have an appropriate new counter-proposition, and so on, as you refine the idea, getting closer to the truth, the essence, or the ideal resolution."For dialectical philosophy nothing is final, absolute, sacred. It reveals the transitory character of everything and in everything; nothing can endure before it except the uninterrupted process of becoming and of passing away, of endless ascendancy from the lower to the higher." https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/d/i.htm
Here is a scholarly paper on the more general applications of the method.
https://www.oise.utoronto.ca/clsew/User ... Oct_18.pdf
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: April 9th, 2018, 3:57 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Franz Kafka
- Contact:
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
I read a side of the paper, and I think I could not distinguish the dialectical materialism as a methodology from being conducive to chaos rather than organizing the data. it seems mess-olog more than methodology.Alias wrote: ↑June 12th, 2018, 2:27 pmAll that really means is: Look at the subject, not as a singular thing, but as part of a bigger process. Every proposition has a counter-proposition. In each encounter, one idea or solution wins over its opposite, but is changed in the process. That altered proposition will have an appropriate new counter-proposition, and so on, as you refine the idea, getting closer to the truth, the essence, or the ideal resolution."For dialectical philosophy nothing is final, absolute, sacred. It reveals the transitory character of everything and in everything; nothing can endure before it except the uninterrupted process of becoming and of passing away, of endless ascendancy from the lower to the higher." https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/d/i.htm
Here is a scholarly paper on the more general applications of the method.
https://www.oise.utoronto.ca/clsew/User ... Oct_18.pdf
- ThomasHobbes
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
A way of looking at a problem; method.kordofany wrote: ↑June 12th, 2018, 11:42 amokThomasHobbes wrote: ↑June 12th, 2018, 4:24 am Marxism is a theory of economic history.
As for the rest of your question. You need to understand the word theory. You are using it as if it were some kind of myth or a speculation.
Theories are ways of looking. And they assert that in given circumstances, consequences will follow. Good theories are well constructed and logical. They predict outcomes, and retrodict past events.
Marx's views hold good for the conditions which he observed about the relations of capital. They hold good for his time, and his ideas still pertain and are used throughout economic thinking. Their predictive value is only lessened to the extent that we now use money in the differently and financial vehicles are used which did not exist. Mostly that just changes the speed of changes.
There is no distinction between theory and science. ALL science is theory.
another question:
Marxists say that the dialectical materialism is methodology?
I do not understand what they mean by methodology. (Is it a theory or a methodology?)
Maybe you should start with a dictionary of philosophical and scientific terms?
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: April 9th, 2018, 3:57 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Franz Kafka
- Contact:
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
What I would say is that the methodology is a tight control mechanism to use and analyze the data to arrive at highly reliable results. According to this paper, the dialectic material does not appear to me to do so.
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: September 19th, 2018, 3:44 am
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
Notice: I am not stating anything about the applicability/relevance of Marxism. I'm merely stating that it's a theory and that hardliners think otherwise.
I, for one, like several things about communism and Marxism, but I am not mentioning any of that here. I don't consider myself a Marxist/Communist, either.
In short, it is a theory, but beware of the hard-line stance.
- Frewah
- Posts: 45
- Joined: September 30th, 2018, 3:30 pm
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
Karl marx had no known education as an economist, yet he is described as one. You’re not an economist just because you have ideas that you publish, neither are you a philosopher just because you have a beard.
Had he not used fancy words, coined new words like proletarian and not been bailed out all the time by Engels, then I think he would have been completely forgotten.
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: help me please:Is Marxism a science or a theory?
The theory precedes the testing, or there would be nothing to test. However, there is certainly observation and data before the theory is formulated.
Which parts of Capital are factually incorrect?
This is factually incorrect.It has been tested for some 70 years and the outcome is obvious.
Where has Marxist theory been put into practice? On a national level, no place: regimes have called themselves Marxist or communist, but were in fact totalitarian and militaristic. Marxist-style parties have been formed voluntarily, and achieved some political success, in countries under the influence of the US, where they were ruthlessly squashed. Neither of these are tests of a theory. They're merely examples of bad governance, of which there is no shortage, in any ideology or economic system.
For actual testing of theory, you would have to look for sharing communities, that operate alongside or underneath, dominant political systems. Say, the Seventh day Adventists or https://www.ic.org/directory/communes/
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023