Politics and Philosophy

Use this philosophy forum to discuss and debate general philosophy topics that don't fit into one of the other categories.

This forum is NOT for factual, informational or scientific questions about philosophy (e.g. "What year was Socrates born?"). Those kind of questions can be asked in the off-topic section.
User avatar
Burning ghost
Posts: 3065
Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am

Politics and Philosophy

Post by Burning ghost »

In philosophical media is there any stance that is apolitical?

More broadly speaking is there an antonym to “political” that goes further than mere “non-political”?
AKA badgerjelly
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7932
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by LuckyR »

Depending on your viewpoint you could use unbiased or objective in that context.
"As usual... it depends."
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by Steve3007 »

Political reporting that attempts to be unbiased is often coloquially referred to as "he said, she said..." reporting. Attempting to simply report the competing narratives' claims factually.

The trouble is, even if we claim to be simply reporting facts, we have to select which facts to report and which to leave out. That selection process can be, and frequently is, itself a political act. So it's then a matter of analysis to decide whether the reporting of facts was "balanced". And then we re-introduce uncertainty and opinion because it's difficult to objectively assess what constitutes "balance", short of reporting everything that everybody in the world has ever said.

A recent example from this forum that springs to mind: In another topic ("How to define antisemitism"), ThomasHobbes said this:
Mass hysteria in this case is a set of lies offered to us by a media which is comprised of right wingers. Many of them Jewish, or in business with Jews.
I criticised this post, and ThomasHobbes' rejoinder was:
What part of my post do you think it unfactual?
I replied:
Saying "Many of them Jewish, or in business with Jews" is true. But the truths we choose to point out and those we choose not to point out are often significant.
My point was that pointing out that someone is "in business with Jews" is no doubt true but the selection is what is significant. I'm sure I myself do business with Jews, as I do with (for example) women, men, black people, white people, Americans, Brits, Turks, etc.

If I said:

"Mass hysteria in this case is a set of lies offered to us by a media which is comprised of right wingers. Many of them black, or in business with blacks."

could that, being factually true, be regarded as a politically neutral statement?

(Note: Even in reporting this conversation I am making a choice as to which posts to quote and which not to quote. Am I being fair?)
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by Hereandnow »

BG:
is there an antonym to “political” that goes further than mere “non-political



]You don't look to a thing's nature to determine if it is political or not, lest the conversation turn toward the essence of politics, merely, a conceptual matter, in which case listening to music is clearly not political while stumping for a candidate running for political office is. And this brings the question to, not if there is anything not political, but if there is anything that cannot be politicized, and the answer is no. Many things are not inherently political, but everything can be politicized by simply bringing it into the sphere of political concern. And what is this? We get concerned about things politically when they are part of the issues of a society. Selling sportswear (think Nike) just became politicized, though in their respective natures, they have nothing to do with each other.
User avatar
Burning ghost
Posts: 3065
Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by Burning ghost »

I have to apologise. I rushed the OP just before work.

I was asking more along the lines of within the different parts of philosophy “politics” is set apart from things like “ontology” and “aesthetics”. Other philosophical views like “ethics” certainly play a role in “politics”, and “idealism” is kind of opposite to “relativism” ... in THAT respect is there some philosophical field that weighs in against “politics”? All I can think of is “anarchism”, but it is really a subset of “politics”.
AKA badgerjelly
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7932
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by LuckyR »

Burning ghost wrote: September 9th, 2018, 3:27 pm I have to apologise. I rushed the OP just before work.

I was asking more along the lines of within the different parts of philosophy “politics” is set apart from things like “ontology” and “aesthetics”. Other philosophical views like “ethics” certainly play a role in “politics”, and “idealism” is kind of opposite to “relativism” ... in THAT respect is there some philosophical field that weighs in against “politics”? All I can think of is “anarchism”, but it is really a subset of “politics”.
I sort of got that from your OP. In my mind, political implies manipulation of a set of facts to fit a predetermined political theory/agenda. Hence why, IMO the opposite of political is to consider all opinions or viewpoints on a topic.
"As usual... it depends."
Eduk
Posts: 2466
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by Eduk »

Apolitical is a word. It means not interested in politics.
Unknown means unknown.
Eduk
Posts: 2466
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by Eduk »

Sorry, perhaps I misunderstand. You mean something like moral, immoral and amoral? I think apolitical and amoral mean the same but are perhaps rarely used the same? As in saying you aren't interested in politics is different than saying you don't possess the capacity to be interested in politics.
But now I'm not sure if you are talking about uninterested in politics or incapable of being interested in politics?
Unknown means unknown.
User avatar
Burning ghost
Posts: 3065
Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by Burning ghost »

Eduk wrote: September 11th, 2018, 3:58 am Sorry, perhaps I misunderstand. You mean something like moral, immoral and amoral? I think apolitical and amoral mean the same but are perhaps rarely used the same? As in saying you aren't interested in politics is different than saying you don't possess the capacity to be interested in politics.
But now I'm not sure if you are talking about uninterested in politics or incapable of being interested in politics?
I was thinking more along the lines of an philosophical view that takes up a contra-view to political philosophy. I guess it would be some kind of weird solipsistic wholly egocentric regard for aesthetics - or even pure hedonism. I say this because it appears to me that whilst politics obviously deals with people who are subjective and full of opinions its aim is to rationalise rather than be all touchy feely about societal problems.

Of course I am framing “hedonism” here as an absolute pursuit of physical pleasures even though I undestand perfectly well there are differing schools of thought within “hedonism” and I’m glossing over this and misrepresenting it by using the term as understood in common parse.

Then the other counter field to politics could be something like religion, but given that religion is quite obviously embedded within the political sphere I’d be using it specifically in reference to “personal” theological views of existence rather than as an institution.

It was ust one of those rando questions that popped into my head. Maybe there is no contra-philosophical field like there is with idealism and rationalism - or if there is we’re not really nuanced enough with our subjects to make use of it yet.
AKA badgerjelly
Eduk
Posts: 2466
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by Eduk »

I don't think politics has a direction to be counter to? It's like philosophy?
Unknown means unknown.
User avatar
Burning ghost
Posts: 3065
Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by Burning ghost »

You're probably correct. Like I said I was musing about the possibility. I am fascinated by different kinds of antonyms and how items of thought are sometimes set against each other as if oppositional - such as "stoicism and hedonism", but yet again these are idealised views not categories of study.

Maybe "mysticism" fits the bill if anything. After all political philosophy deals with society, and person/s and people/s, rather than with vague language and an appeal toward more irrational approaches to problems based on feeling and free wheeling thought.
AKA badgerjelly
User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 1122
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by ThomasHobbes »

Eduk wrote: September 12th, 2018, 3:11 am I don't think politics has a direction to be counter to? It's like philosophy?
You can be apolitical, but I've love to know what anti-political would look like????

I think you can be anti-intellectual, and even anti-philosphical, but anti-political is a political act, as much in fact is.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7932
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by LuckyR »

ThomasHobbes wrote: September 12th, 2018, 6:47 pm
Eduk wrote: September 12th, 2018, 3:11 am I don't think politics has a direction to be counter to? It's like philosophy?
You can be apolitical, but I've love to know what anti-political would look like????

I think you can be anti-intellectual, and even anti-philosphical, but anti-political is a political act, as much in fact is.
Well, it depends on perspective. For example, a supreme dictatorship is a political system, but since there are no competing political interests, the common understanding of the meaning of "political" that is the chauvinistic jockeying between political factions does not exist, officially.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 1122
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by ThomasHobbes »

LuckyR wrote: September 13th, 2018, 2:36 pm
ThomasHobbes wrote: September 12th, 2018, 6:47 pm

You can be apolitical, but I've love to know what anti-political would look like????

I think you can be anti-intellectual, and even anti-philosphical, but anti-political is a political act, as much in fact is.
Well, it depends on perspective. For example, a supreme dictatorship is a political system, but since there are no competing political interests, the common understanding of the meaning of "political" that is the chauvinistic jockeying between political factions does not exist, officially.
Any kind of compliance with a dictator is a political act.
I still can't see any example of 'anti-political'.
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Politics and Philosophy

Post by Sy Borg »

Not even hermits can avoid politics because out in the wild they would encounter other species with which they'd have to compete for shelter and resources.

Maybe the closest to the apolitical is Zenlike focus and absorption in an activity or study? It's only temporary respite, though, because one still needs to support oneself and that requires competition.
Post Reply

Return to “General Philosophy”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021