Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post Number:#136  Postby Fan of Science » July 16th, 2017, 8:09 pm

Spiral Out: Just think of a number line with the set of natural numbers marked. Start at the point that corresponds to the number one. Then, move 1 to the right, which represents the operation of "adding 1," and you'll end up at the point marked with a 2, the "squiggly line." The operation of addition is essentially sliding along the number line.
Fan of Science
 
Posts: 172 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: May 26th, 2017, 1:39 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?



Become a member for less ads

Already a member? Login
 

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post Number:#137  Postby Synthesis » July 17th, 2017, 3:55 pm

Fan of Science wrote:That's nonsense. The number 2 is an abstraction, as all mathematical objects are. Being ignorant of the meaning of these mathematical abstractions does not in any way undermine them. It simply means you have not taken the time to learn mathematics before commenting. It's not just math that has this level of abstraction, so do other subjects, like economics. As an example, the amount listed in your bank account is not a reference to any specific, unique, set of dollar bills.

The number two is an abstraction of exactly what? If you wish to apply the term abstraction to economics, then consider the abstraction of labor-value earned into its money-form.
Synthesis
 
Posts: 176 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: July 15th, 2017, 12:54 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post Number:#138  Postby Fan of Science » July 17th, 2017, 11:33 pm

Synthesis: The labor-value theory in economics has been debunked long ago and so no I will not waste my time trying to argue that a non-empirical value claim is in any sense true. The number 2 is an abstraction that little children learn. They learn what is common about 2 chairs, 2 dollars, 2 houses, 2 women, 2 schools, 2 cars, etc. That's the part that you completely reject.
Fan of Science
 
Posts: 172 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: May 26th, 2017, 1:39 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post Number:#139  Postby Magicpotion » July 19th, 2017, 5:07 pm

Synthesis wrote:The number two is an abstraction of exactly what?


I've always conceptualised the number two as an abstraction of polar-opposites on a spectrum.

Day and Night
Hot and Cold
Up and Down

Although these things may be unified in reality (all is one), we conceptualise them as two different things to compare, contrast and show the variety within the spectrum.
User avatar
Magicpotion
New Trial Member
 
Posts: 13 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: July 1st, 2017, 10:01 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post Number:#140  Postby Jacqueline Sheehan » August 14th, 2017, 2:35 pm

Biologically speaking, 1+1 might = 3.
User avatar
Jacqueline Sheehan
New Trial Member
 
Posts: 8 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: July 28th, 2017, 1:31 pm

Previous

Return to Philosophy of Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Philosophy Trophies

Most Active Members
by posts made in lasts 30 days

Avatar Member Name Recent Posts
Greta 162
Fooloso4 116
Renee 107
Ormond 97
Felix 90

Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST

Most Active Book of the Month Participants
by book of the month posts

Avatar Member Name BOTM Posts
Scott 147
Spectrum 23
Belinda 23
whitetrshsoldier 20
Josefina1110 19
Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST