## Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.

### Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Spiral Out: Just think of a number line with the set of natural numbers marked. Start at the point that corresponds to the number one. Then, move 1 to the right, which represents the operation of "adding 1," and you'll end up at the point marked with a 2, the "squiggly line." The operation of addition is essentially sliding along the number line.
Fan of Science

Posts: 172 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: May 26th, 2017, 1:39 pm

### Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Become a member for less ads

### Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Fan of Science wrote:That's nonsense. The number 2 is an abstraction, as all mathematical objects are. Being ignorant of the meaning of these mathematical abstractions does not in any way undermine them. It simply means you have not taken the time to learn mathematics before commenting. It's not just math that has this level of abstraction, so do other subjects, like economics. As an example, the amount listed in your bank account is not a reference to any specific, unique, set of dollar bills.

The number two is an abstraction of exactly what? If you wish to apply the term abstraction to economics, then consider the abstraction of labor-value earned into its money-form.
Synthesis

Posts: 176 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: July 15th, 2017, 12:54 pm

### Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Synthesis: The labor-value theory in economics has been debunked long ago and so no I will not waste my time trying to argue that a non-empirical value claim is in any sense true. The number 2 is an abstraction that little children learn. They learn what is common about 2 chairs, 2 dollars, 2 houses, 2 women, 2 schools, 2 cars, etc. That's the part that you completely reject.
Fan of Science

Posts: 172 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: May 26th, 2017, 1:39 pm

### Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Synthesis wrote:The number two is an abstraction of exactly what?

I've always conceptualised the number two as an abstraction of polar-opposites on a spectrum.

Day and Night
Hot and Cold
Up and Down

Although these things may be unified in reality (all is one), we conceptualise them as two different things to compare, contrast and show the variety within the spectrum.

Magicpotion
New Trial Member

Posts: 13 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: July 1st, 2017, 10:01 pm

### Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Biologically speaking, 1+1 might = 3.

Jacqueline Sheehan
New Trial Member

Posts: 8 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: July 28th, 2017, 1:31 pm

Previous

### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

### Most Active Membersby posts made in lasts 30 days

Avatar Member Name Recent Posts
Greta 162
Fooloso4 116
Renee 107
Ormond 97
Felix 90

Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST

### Most Active Book of the Month Participantsby book of the month posts

Avatar Member Name BOTM Posts
Scott 147
Spectrum 23
Belinda 23
whitetrshsoldier 20
Josefina1110 19
Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST