Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordinary

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.
Mechsmith
Posts: 210
Joined: October 27th, 2013, 5:09 pm

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Mechsmith »

Rainman, I tend to think that a "field" is set up by relative motion. In the case of electromagnet fields, by the motions of electrons in a conductor. In the case of gravitational fields, the field is set up by the motions of electrons in matter.

A field can exert "pull". This is how solenoids work. Also the pull may be why the electrons don't just fly away from the nucleus. Or the planets from the sun.

This is simply my thought as to "what is gravity?". Id like to see somebody chase the idea a bit further.

Think Hard. M
Chili
Posts: 392
Joined: September 29th, 2017, 4:59 pm

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Chili »

If two bodies are close together, and are exchanging a volley of particles, then each one, like a gun recoiling, or people playing catch, experiences a "pushing" force, and they will be inclined to move apart.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Steve3007 »

Yes. That is the analogy that is often used in explaining the particle exchange model for repulsive forces. For attractive forces, a more contorted analogy which makes use of boomerangs is sometimes used. Clearly these are analogies. Obviously the recoil idea is a recursive analogy because the impact of the particle which is proposed to be the mechanism by which force works is itself a force.
User avatar
Atreyu
Posts: 1737
Joined: June 17th, 2014, 3:11 am
Favorite Philosopher: P.D. Ouspensky
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Atreyu »

Steve3007 wrote:Are readers happy to allow that familiar, everyday phenomena are explained in terms of such combinations of seemingly outlandish and initially difficult to believe underlying mechanisms? Or do you mistrust these explanations? Is it a tenet of your philosophy that it must be possible to describe everyday things using everyday mechanisms and language?
Well, science and philosophy are two different things.

Explaining phenomena via quantum physics is science. It's scientific theory. And I have no problem with it. However, I enjoy philosophy, and electromagnetic theory is science, not philosophy.

My tenet of philosophy is that it explains phenomenon to me in a way that satisfies me. And whether or not I'm satisfied with the explanation would depend on what I'm trying to understand in that moment. So generally the more coherent, simple, and most "common-sensical" explanation is ordinarily preferable (occam's razor).
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Steve3007 »

Atreyu:
Well, science and philosophy are two different things.

Explaining phenomena via quantum physics is science. It's scientific theory. And I have no problem with it. However, I enjoy philosophy, and electromagnetic theory is science, not philosophy.
There are several categories of topic on this website with names of the form "Philosophy of X" where X is some subject, like science. Do you think that all such categories have no place on a philosophy website? Science/Politics/Religion/Art and philosophy are two different things?
User avatar
Atreyu
Posts: 1737
Joined: June 17th, 2014, 3:11 am
Favorite Philosopher: P.D. Ouspensky
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Atreyu »

Steve3007 wrote:There are several categories of topic on this website with names of the form "Philosophy of X" where X is some subject, like science. Do you think that all such categories have no place on a philosophy website? Science/Politics/Religion/Art and philosophy are two different things?
No, not at all. You can philosophize about science, but discussing the particulars of scientific theory is science, not philosophy.

Explaining phenomena via quantum mechanics would be science. Discussing the relevancy and implications of quantum theory might be philosophy.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Steve3007 »

Atreyu:
You can philosophize about science, but discussing the particulars of scientific theory is science, not philosophy.
I see your point. But I think philosophical questions can be examined by considering particular examples of science (or politics, art, religion etc) as exemplars of a wider point. To me, considering the "philosophy of" a particular subject means standing way back and trying to spot some very deep principles that might be illustrated by specifics. So it involves getting up close before standing back. This is done in many of the topics on this site. A particular issue within the subject in question is used to start a philosophical discussion.

In the case of this topic, I was seeking to use a particular piece of physics to examine the question (the philosophical question?) of whether everyday phenomena can have extraordinary counter-intuitive underlying mechanisms. (This was the question at the end of the OP. That was the "standing back" part.)
User avatar
Atreyu
Posts: 1737
Joined: June 17th, 2014, 3:11 am
Favorite Philosopher: P.D. Ouspensky
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Atreyu »

Steve3007 wrote:I see your point. But I think philosophical questions can be examined by considering particular examples of science (or politics, art, religion etc) as exemplars of a wider point. To me, considering the "philosophy of" a particular subject means standing way back and trying to spot some very deep principles that might be illustrated by specifics. So it involves getting up close before standing back. This is done in many of the topics on this site. A particular issue within the subject in question is used to start a philosophical discussion.

In the case of this topic, I was seeking to use a particular piece of physics to examine the question (the philosophical question?) of whether everyday phenomena can have extraordinary counter-intuitive underlying mechanisms. (This was the question at the end of the OP. That was the "standing back" part.)
I also see your point, and get it. And your question is a good one.

Your question seems to be basically, "How much weight should we give to some of the strange and extraordinarily counter-intuitive explanations posited in some modern scientific theories?"

Well, I would definitely take them with a grain of salt. The question is how practical are the explanations. By "practical", however, I don't mean in the sense of enabling us to build a better mousetrap, but rather does it help us to understand things better. Do they help make the Universe more sensible and understandable? Or do they only make the Universe seem more complicated and confusing?

If the former, then I would accept the explanation as "valid" and useful. However, if the latter, then I would call the explanation an "aberration" or "distraction".

It all depends on whether it makes things more, or less, clear...
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Steve3007 »

Atreyu:
Well, I would definitely take them with a grain of salt. The question is how practical are the explanations. By "practical", however, I don't mean in the sense of enabling us to build a better mousetrap, but rather does it help us to understand things better. Do they help make the Universe more sensible and understandable? Or do they only make the Universe seem more complicated and confusing?

If the former, then I would accept the explanation as "valid" and useful. However, if the latter, then I would call the explanation an "aberration" or "distraction".
I don't think I'd put it in quite those terms. They sound too subjective to me. What seems sensible and understandable to one person might be complicated and confusing to another.

I would say that scientific theories should be judged to the extent to which they accurately describe a relatively large set of possible observations with a relatively small theory. The bigger the ratio between the former and the latter, the better the theory.

The reason I think the subject of the OP qualifies is that it is part of a theory which unites electricity and magnetism into a single phenomenon - electromagnetism. So it decreases the amount of theory required to accurately describe a very large set of possible observations.
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Sy Borg »

Steve3007 wrote:The reason I think the subject of the OP qualifies is that it is part of a theory which unites electricity and magnetism into a single phenomenon - electromagnetism. So it decreases the amount of theory required to accurately describe a very large set of possible observations.
It's basically just chunking. Each finding is part of a larger one, just as everything we know can be found on Sagan's "pale blue dot". We can keep drilling down to incredible complexity - or push outwards - and each time to an unknown extent.

The complexity involved in the details of each domain of reality and its interrelations are not suited to comprehension by simian brains. Worse, developing a reliable and objective overarching narrative when living within larger systems may not be possible. Still, we've done pretty well so far.
User avatar
Atreyu
Posts: 1737
Joined: June 17th, 2014, 3:11 am
Favorite Philosopher: P.D. Ouspensky
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Atreyu »

Steve3007 wrote:I don't think I'd put it in quite those terms. They sound too subjective to me. What seems sensible and understandable to one person might be complicated and confusing to another.
In this case, you're the only person that counts. I don't care if a theory makes sense to others, only to myself. So if a theory gives me a less coherent view of the Universe, as a philosopher trying to understand the Universe, I wouldn't "accept" it. If, however, it does make the Universe more sensible, then it fits in with my goal of having a more objective and/or broad understanding of things, and I would endorse it.
Steve3007 wrote: I would say that scientific theories should be judged to the extent to which they accurately describe a relatively large set of possible observations with a relatively small theory. The bigger the ratio between the former and the latter, the better the theory.

The reason I think the subject of the OP qualifies is that it is part of a theory which unites electricity and magnetism into a single phenomenon - electromagnetism. So it decreases the amount of theory required to accurately describe a very large set of possible observations.
But this is basically what I've been trying to say. A theory like electromagnetism, which unites various phenomenon and even other theories into a single unified explanation, is precisely what would give me a more clear, broad, and encompassing view of the world.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Magnetism - distilling the everyday from the extraordina

Post by Steve3007 »

Atreyu:
But this is basically what I've been trying to say. A theory like electromagnetism, which unites various phenomenon and even other theories into a single unified explanation, is precisely what would give me a more clear, broad, and encompassing view of the world.
OK. Good! We agree. :-)
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Science”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021