Human evolution "stopped" earlier than we might think

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.
Wilson
Posts: 1500
Joined: December 22nd, 2013, 4:57 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Eric Hoffer
Location: California, US

Re: Human evolution "stopped" earlier than we might think

Post by Wilson »

Dysorganism wrote:My guess is that human evolution is faster now than ever before. As many have pointed out evolutionary success is to have the maximum number of fertile offspring. Palaeolithic humans were well adapted to their environment. There were probably few new genes that gave a strong selective advantage. The reproductive strategy was to have few children, invest heavily in raising each child and to have low child mortality compared to most other species.
Not sure how you arrived at that conclusion about human evolution being faster now. Almost everyone in developed countries live long lives, so there's less selective pressure than there used to be. And the human population is huge compared to the olden days, so evolution is going to be slower than then. As a simplified example, say the human population was down to ten people. Any survival characteristic is going to be heavily adopted in the next generation and all the generations after that, whereas nowadays it would get mostly lost in the general population.

Poor people around the world have large numbers of children compared to affluent families. I'm pretty sure hunter-gatherer mothers were popping out babies right and left. Family planning wasn't an advanced science, and it was high infant mortality that kept the number of surviving offspring down. In African countries today women have huge numbers of kids because of their high mortality rate so they'll have enough children to take care of them in old age, and I suspect that it was the same in prehistoric times.

But I suspect that wasn't your point, exactly. I do believe that each species arrives at the optimum number of offspring per mama. In the case of humans, the babies require tremendous and prolonged care by the mother, because in order to develop the brainpower that gives them their survival advantage, it's a slow process and involves learning from the elders.
Dysorganism
Posts: 6
Joined: September 12th, 2013, 12:26 pm

Re: Human evolution "stopped" earlier than we might think

Post by Dysorganism »

enegue wrote:
Dysorganism wrote:My guess is that human evolution is faster now than ever before. As many have pointed out evolutionary success is to have the maximum number of fertile offspring. Palaeolithic humans were well adapted to their environment. There were probably few new genes that gave a strong selective advantage. The reproductive strategy was to have few children, invest heavily in raising each child and to have low child mortality compared to most other species.
You don't think that hunger, violence and disease might have played the significant role in the keeping population numbers depressed?

Cheers,
enegue
No, I do think hunger, violence and disease kept populations down. I'm just saying that compared to most other species mortality was probably still low. If not we would not have been here today. With all the effort it takes to raise and educate a human child, humans just can't afford to have enough children to compensate for a mortality rate as high as most other species. The other extreme is a species like frog that lay thousands of eggs and the lets the tadpoles fend for themselves.

Tomas
Dysorganism
Posts: 6
Joined: September 12th, 2013, 12:26 pm

Re: Human evolution "stopped" earlier than we might think

Post by Dysorganism »

Wilson wrote:
Dysorganism wrote:My guess is that human evolution is faster now than ever before. As many have pointed out evolutionary success is to have the maximum number of fertile offspring. Palaeolithic humans were well adapted to their environment. There were probably few new genes that gave a strong selective advantage. The reproductive strategy was to have few children, invest heavily in raising each child and to have low child mortality compared to most other species.
Not sure how you arrived at that conclusion about human evolution being faster now. Almost everyone in developed countries live long lives, so there's less selective pressure than there used to be.
My point was that evolutionary success is not just about not dying it's also about having many offspring. Surviving in a paleolithic environment is something we are adapted for. But we are not adapted for maximizing number of offspring in an environment were almost all survive.

Let’s say there is a gene called tenplus. Everybody that has the tenplus gene gets more than ten children. It's not hard to see that in a modern environment with low mortality the tenplus gene would be quite successful and humanity would change. If you accept that reasoning you have to admit that evolution is at least theoretically possible even if mortality is low.

I don’t expect there to be a tenplus gene. But I think there are genetic variants that will favour reproduction.
Wilson wrote: And the human population is huge compared to the olden days, so evolution is going to be slower than then. As a simplified example, say the human population was down to ten people. Any survival characteristic is going to be heavily adopted in the next generation and all the generations after that, whereas nowadays it would get mostly lost in the general population.
I don't remember that much about how population size affect evolution rate. But I’m sure it’s not that simple. In a larger population the rate of new beneficial mutations entering the population is higher. The likelihood of a beneficial mutation becoming fixed in the whole population is still quite high. Once the mutation has reached a high enough number of individuals it is not likely to disappear and the survival advantage will push it to become fixated in the whole population. Then there is genetic drift. New neutral mutations spread and become fixed by chance. Genetic drift will be affected differently by population size. A Populations genetic makeup always change even without selection pressure. Species are often comprised of many population with some sharing of genes. Population size and evolution rate is really complex
Wilson wrote: Poor people around the world have large numbers of children compared to affluent families. I'm pretty sure hunter-gatherer mothers were popping out babies right and left. Family planning wasn't an advanced science, and it was high infant mortality that kept the number of surviving offspring down. In African countries today women have huge numbers of kids because of their high mortality rate so they'll have enough children to take care of them in old age, and I suspect that it was the same in prehistoric times.
I think hunter-gatherer societies practice more birth control than agricultrual societies. But I cant give you a source.
Dysorganism
Posts: 6
Joined: September 12th, 2013, 12:26 pm

Re: Human evolution "stopped" earlier than we might think

Post by Dysorganism »

enegue wrote:
Dysorganism wrote:My guess is that human evolution is faster now than ever before. As many have pointed out evolutionary success is to have the maximum number of fertile offspring. Palaeolithic humans were well adapted to their environment. There were probably few new genes that gave a strong selective advantage. The reproductive strategy was to have few children, invest heavily in raising each child and to have low child mortality compared to most other species.
You don't think that hunger, violence and disease might have played the significant role in the keeping population numbers depressed?
No, I do think hunger, violence and disease kept populations down. I'm just saying that compared to most other species mortality was probably still low. If not we would not have been here today. With all the effort it takes to raise and educate a human child, humans just can't afford to have enough children to compensate for a mortality rate as high as most other species. The other extreme is a species like frog that lay thousands of eggs and then lets the tadpoles fend for themselves.

Tomas
Dysorganism
Posts: 6
Joined: September 12th, 2013, 12:26 pm

Re: Human evolution "stopped" earlier than we might think

Post by Dysorganism »

Wilson wrote:
Disorganise wrote:My guess is that human evolution is faster now than ever before. As many have pointed out evolutionary success is to have the maximum number of fertile offspring. Palaeolithic humans were well adapted to their environment. There were probably few new genes that gave a strong selective advantage. The reproductive strategy was to have few children, invest heavily in raising each child and to have low child mortality compared to most other species.
Not sure how you arrived at that conclusion about human evolution being faster now. Almost everyone in developed countries live long lives, so there's less selective pressure than there used to be.
My point was that evolutionary success is not just about not dying it's also about having many offspring. Surviving in a paleolithic environment is something we are adapted for. But we are not adapted for maximizing number of offspring in an environment were almost all survive.

Let’s say there is a gene called tenplus. Everybody that has the tenplus gene gets more than ten children. It's not hard to see that in a modern environment with low mortality the tenplus gene would be quite successful and humanity would evolve to have more children. If you accept that reasoning you have to admit that evolution is at least theoretically possible even if mortality is low.

I don’t expect there to be a tenplus gene. But I think there are genetic variants that will favour reproduction.
Wilson wrote: And the human population is huge compared to the olden days, so evolution is going to be slower than then. As a simplified example, say the human population was down to ten people. Any survival characteristic is going to be heavily adopted in the next generation and all the generations after that, whereas nowadays it would get mostly lost in the general population.
I don't remember that much about how population size affect evolution rate. But I’m quite sure it’s not that simple. In a larger population the rate of new beneficial mutations entering the population is higher. The likelihood of a beneficial mutation becoming fixed in the whole population is still quite high. I think a larger population increases the speed of adaptive evolution.

Then there is a different mechanism called genetic drift. Drift is when new mutations without survival value spread and become fixed in a population by chance. A large population size may make it harder for drift to happen.

A population’s genetic makeup always change even without selection pressure. Species are often comprised of many populations with some sharing of genes. The relation between population size and evolution rate is really complex.

Tomas
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Human evolution "stopped" earlier than we might think

Post by Felix »

Quoting a post by A Poster: "If we start directly engineering our own genome at the molecular level, then I'd say we'll have sped up evolution quite a helluva lot."

Actually, we're already doing this but negatively and "unintentionally" by fouling our environment (and increasingly so) with pollutants that cause human genetic mutations and decrease human fertility (e.g., synthetic chemicals that mimic biohormones) - hardly a desirable form of evolutionary pressure.

"If we begin to carry our own artificial environments into space and disseminate our genome off-world, we will certainly be leapfrogging over what evolution without her human component could do."

Yes, after we succeed in making this planet a wasteland unfit for human habitation we may survive long enough to move on to our next garbage dump. I'm being somewhat facetious - only somewhat.

An obvious quote by Obvious Leo: "However on the plus side, fewer humans die at the hands of other humans than ever before in human history, so we have reason to be optimistic about the information age we're entering into."

I distrust the statistic, especially if one includes all the novel new ways mankind now has of killing his fellow man and/or shortening his/her lifespan and curbing his/her reproductive capacity: a wide variety of weapons of mass destruction and the chemical warfare of the aforementioned industrial pollutants.

Gee, I'd better stop now, I'm starting to sound like a cynic....
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
Obvious Leo
Posts: 2501
Joined: April 28th, 2013, 10:03 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Omar Khayyam
Location: Australia

Re: Human evolution "stopped" earlier than we might think

Post by Obvious Leo »

You're a gloomy sod, Felix, but I fear you may be right. The survival value of human intelligence has never been satisfactorily demonstrated and there is good reason to suppose that any civilisation which develops the capacity to destroy itself will inevitably do so.

I guess the question then becomes. How do we avoid our fate?

Regards Leo
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Human evolution "stopped" earlier than we might think

Post by Felix »

"How do we avoid our fate?"

Just what should be obvious: Behaving intelligently and mentoring our children to do likewise, considering how our actions will affect future generations, stop rewarding abject selfishness, greed, avarice, sloth, etc.

Leo, Care to reply to the responses made to your comments in this thread? = "How can an infinite universe have origins?" It's an interesting dicussion, thank you.
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
Obvious Leo
Posts: 2501
Joined: April 28th, 2013, 10:03 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Omar Khayyam
Location: Australia

Re: Human evolution "stopped" earlier than we might think

Post by Obvious Leo »

Felix wrote:Just what should be obvious: Behaving intelligently and mentoring our children to do likewise, considering how our actions will affect future generations, stop rewarding abject selfishness, greed, avarice, sloth, etc.
The obvious is always good with me, Felix, so our future looks assured.

I got a bit disheartened with the infinite universe thread because few posters here seem inclined to talk about either physics or metaphysics, both of which are subjects very dear to my heart. If one is willing to cling to the belief that the universe had a beginning then one must also accept the existence of an external causal agent, which is not to my conceptual taste. However I have no inclination to bandy meaningless words with those who take a different view based solely on faith, because by doing so they deny that reason has a role to play in the comprehension of our cosmos. I feel I have a right to expect better in a philosophy forum and have therefore been spending my time more fruitfully in the garden of late.

Regards Leo
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Science”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021