The DNA universe

Syamsu · Post by **Syamsu** » July 3rd, 2014, 8:41 am

This is my interpretation of theory by Peter Rowlands, Bernard Diaz, Vanessa Hill, Edwina Tarborsky, Daniel Dubois, Peter Marcer and others.

Mathematics can accurately and exhaustively describe the universe, as you can see on computersimulations of things in the universe. What this means is that the fundamental unit of existence is not a particle like a quantum, or an atom, but it is actually symbols. In one hand you hold a piece of paper with a 0 on it, in your other hand you have the natural thing which is 0. So we have a mathematical universe, and a natural universe, both as selfcontained systems.

It works the same way with DNA as it does with mathematics. You can accurately describe what is in the universe proper with DNA. As you can see in the picture the DNA universe is basically a copy of the universe proper.

What this means is that the information contained in DNA is largely not about the organism, but it is about the environment of the organism. The environment in the universe proper is copied to the environment in the DNA universe, and in this DNA environment a new adult organism is chosen whole, and this DNA adult organism is then used for developing the organism in the universe proper into adulthood.

The Beast · Post by **The Beast** » July 3rd, 2014, 12:40 pm

wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ex ... phabet.jpg

The expanded alphabet raises new possibilities.

Syamsu · Post by **Syamsu** » July 4th, 2014, 7:03 am

The Beast wrote:wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/ex ... phabet.jpg

The expanded alphabet raises new possibilities.

Those are exceptions. But it would imply that there are also these exceptions on the physics side. That there can be 2 more parameters as exceptons besides mass, space, time and charge.

The Beast · Post by **The Beast** » July 4th, 2014, 11:52 am

We could envision a 6 amino acid base as an intelligent violation. Therefore, all other violations of the model are intelligent as well. It is the Standard model versus very special theories such as CP violations with CPT symmetry in intelligent nature if it helps to explain it.

Syamsu · Post by **Syamsu** » July 4th, 2014, 12:50 pm

The Beast wrote:We could envision a 6 amino acid base as an intelligent violation. Therefore, all other violations of the model are intelligent as well. It is the Standard model versus very special theories such as CP violations with CPT symmetry in intelligent nature if it helps to explain it.

Weak. That is just playing wordgames to call it intelligence.

Speculate on what the physics exceptions would be like.

The Beast · Post by **The Beast** » July 4th, 2014, 1:19 pm

CPT symmetry is used to explain CP violations. It is part of the very special relativity theory and it is not found in Nature. I said intelligent because the 6 base amino acid was created in the lab. I have no particular agenda but, my intuition points to thought and Free Will as related to the spontaneous breaking of symmetry as it is translated by Nature. Perhaps you can help with some Lorentz’s transformations and from there to special cases to explain possibilities of new intelligence. After a few years of math a Nobel price in Physics will be in the horizon. However, it is my philosophy of Science to exchange ideas and extend my boundaries. Will you like to calculate that as well?

-- Updated August 30th, 2014, 12:40 pm to add the following --

The Beast wrote:CPT symmetry is used to explain CP violations. It is part of the very special relativity theory and it is not found in Nature. I said intelligent because the 6 base amino acid was created in the lab. I have no particular agenda but, my intuition points to thought and Free Will as related to the spontaneous breaking of symmetry as it is translated by Nature. Perhaps you can help with some Lorentz’s transformations and from there to special cases to explain possibilities of new intelligence. After a few years of math a Nobel price in Physics will be in the horizon. However, it is my philosophy of Science to exchange ideas and extend my boundaries. Will you like to calculate that as well?

The new DNA chain could allow more than 4 aminoacids because Nature will allow supersymmetry breaking as calculated in the Standard notion. Is it 10 to the 24? We just speeding up the process. So, the equation is a possibility if supersymmetry exists. If not: the thinking will not be more than a creationist point of view.

Syamsu · Post by **Syamsu** » October 20th, 2014, 5:31 am

...as mentioned before, what this basically means is that the DNA system is a self-contained system, it is it's own world, much alike a 3D computergame is it's own world.

In the future we would in principle be able to model the DNA world on a computer, just like we are capable now to model the physics world on a computer.

It means then that each of us also inhabits their own DNA world, which is alike a garden of Eden, containing man and woman, with an environment. As a man, aren't you intensely aware of it when you meet a woman, and the shapes of the woman correspond to the shapes of the woman in your DNA world?