Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.
Post Reply
NicoL
Posts: 48
Joined: September 1st, 2016, 11:12 am

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by NicoL »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Try this. One lump of clay combined with one lump of clay is just one lump of clay.

PhilX
I know this is an old post, but I cannot but point out the trickery. For one "+" does not mean "combined with" in the context of cardinal numbers. Second, the set whose members are the two individual lumps of clay has a cardinality of 2. Third, a lump of clay and the material it consists in are not the same objects and do not even belong to comparable ontological categories. One is an individual, cohesive, countable object, the other one is stuff that is not countable. "Clay" is a mass term, "lump of clay" is a count term.
Fan of Science
Posts: 172
Joined: May 26th, 2017, 1:39 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by Fan of Science »

There are actually mathematical systems that deal with adding one lump of clay to another lump and getting one lump. I don't have any personal experience with them, but know they exist from some of the math books I have read.

A mathematical truth is only true with respect to its system of axioms, and is not true outside that system.
NicoL
Posts: 48
Joined: September 1st, 2016, 11:12 am

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by NicoL »

Fan of Science wrote:There are actually mathematical systems that deal with adding one lump of clay to another lump and getting one lump. I don't have any personal experience with them, but know they exist from some of the math books I have read.

A mathematical truth is only true with respect to its system of axioms, and is not true outside that system.
Yes, but it is not a really interesting observation that different propositions can have different truth values. Sure, "1+1=2" can be interpreted differently in different contexts, but that's semantics. The point is that when you interpret the sentence "1+1=2" in the context of set theory / cardinal numbers, then you are entertaining a specific formal proposition involving specific formal concepts. The question has to do with how many truth values does (or can) that specific proposition have, otherwise we are just playing word games - or at least that is my understanding :)
Fan of Science
Posts: 172
Joined: May 26th, 2017, 1:39 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by Fan of Science »

It's not word games at all, it's the nature of mathematics. It is impossible to ever refute any mathematical statement regarding "1 + 1 = 2" by referencing empirical evidence. Adding two integers is governed by the axioms of the system. In a certain system "1 + 1 = 2," in a certain system, "1 + 1 = 0," and these systems will not change even if every time someone added one orange to another orange and mysteriously ended up with 5 oranges. This is because the systems of math are based on their axioms and are independent of external evidence. Different mathematical systems, however, can be devised where the "addition" does not involve distinct integers, so that the math can better reflect what is empirically being discussed. However, math will always exist independently of any empirical evidence. This is why Einstein could not refute Euclidean geometry, despite showing spacetime was curved, because Euclidean geometry is based on a specific set of axioms, not on empirical evidence.
User avatar
-1-
Posts: 878
Joined: December 1st, 2016, 2:23 am

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by -1- »

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Yes, there is. It is simply

1+1 <> 2.
This search engine is powered by Hunger, Thirst, and a desperate need to Mate.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by Steve3007 »

This whole clay thing: It's not rocket-maths.

One one kilogram lump of clay plus one one kilogram lump of clay equals one two kilogram lump of clay.
gimal
Posts: 54
Joined: May 28th, 2008, 5:31 am

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by gimal »

read Mathematics ends in contradiction.
gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-conten ... ssible.pdf
1 number [2] + 1 number[3] = 1 number[5]
ie 1+1=1
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by Steve3007 »

Read it last time you posted it. This has all been done before.
User avatar
-1-
Posts: 878
Joined: December 1st, 2016, 2:23 am

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by -1- »

gimal wrote:read Mathematics ends in contradiction.
gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-conten ... ssible.pdf
1 number [2] + 1 number[3] = 1 number[5]
ie 1+1=1
You are comparing apples and oranges.

2 and 3 are different from each other. When you add them together, you get 5, which is different from 2 and different from 3. Yet you claim that they are the same things.

Just because they are numbers.

To you a number is a number is a number.

Well, numbers are different from each other. Different numbers, that is. Ignoring that is ignorant.
This search engine is powered by Hunger, Thirst, and a desperate need to Mate.
Synthesis
Posts: 189
Joined: July 15th, 2017, 12:54 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by Synthesis »

Excuse me for not reading all the posts, but please consider the following...

If you can accept the notion that all things [in the Universe] are unique, then how can "2" exist?
Fan of Science
Posts: 172
Joined: May 26th, 2017, 1:39 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by Fan of Science »

Two can exist because it is an abstraction, and we are not using the number to equate to all aspects of a given object. Two dogs means that there are two dogs, not necessarily that the two dogs are exactly the same.

Not to mention that when you get to smaller subatomic particles, they are identical.
Synthesis
Posts: 189
Joined: July 15th, 2017, 12:54 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by Synthesis »

FOS, you can not use '2' to prove that 2 exists. Saying that there are two dogs is simply an false idea built in to familiar language. I am suggesting that any object occupying a particular place in space and time is subject to unique set of forces and is therefore, by definition, unique. It might be by "a little bit," but [technically], there is no other object exactly the same. Therefore, 2 can not exist.

It is only through our intellectual laziness and linguistic conventions that we make two possible, no?
Fan of Science
Posts: 172
Joined: May 26th, 2017, 1:39 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by Fan of Science »

That's nonsense. The number 2 is an abstraction, as all mathematical objects are. Being ignorant of the meaning of these mathematical abstractions does not in any way undermine them. It simply means you have not taken the time to learn mathematics before commenting. It's not just math that has this level of abstraction, so do other subjects, like economics. As an example, the amount listed in your bank account is not a reference to any specific, unique, set of dollar bills.
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by Spiral Out »

I'll ask again. How is one straight line and another straight line somehow equal to that of a squiggly line?
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Is there a way to refute '1+1 = 2'?

Post by Steve3007 »

Spiral Out:
I'll ask again. How is one straight line and another straight line somehow equal to that of a squiggly line?
Have you previously asked that?

The squiqqly line is this symbol '2', yes? And the straight line is this symbol - '1' - when not written by a French person. (They always make them look like '7').

I guess the answer is essentially the same as the answer to this question: Why does a whole load of squiggly lines created by one person on one side of the world cause a whole load of different squiggly lines to be generated by another person on another side of the world?
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Science”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021