The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.
Post Reply
User avatar
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 2116
Joined: May 25th, 2013, 8:41 pm

The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

Note the parentheses. Currently the speed of light is said to be about 300,000 meters per second. I have no problem with the number. It's the vacuum part I have a problem with.

There is no such thing as a perfect vacuum. Never was and never will be. So the speed of light, at best, must be theoretical. How do we determine what the actual speed of light is to exact precision without a vacuum to work with?

PhilX
DarwinX
Posts: 1298
Joined: April 14th, 2013, 4:30 am
Favorite Philosopher: Stephen Hurrell
Location: Australia

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by DarwinX »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Note the parentheses. Currently the speed of light is said to be about 300,000 meters per second. I have no problem with the number. It's the vacuum part I have a problem with.

There is no such thing as a perfect vacuum. Never was and never will be. So the speed of light, at best, must be theoretical. How do we determine what the actual speed of light is to exact precision without a vacuum to work with?

PhilX
The only vacuum that exists is in the minds of scientists that think there is a vacuum. :lol: :lol: :lol:
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Beware! The devil wears the mask of a saint.
Logicus
Posts: 865
Joined: September 20th, 2012, 10:22 pm

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by Logicus »

First, the speed of light is roughly 300,000 KILOmeters per second.

Secondly, the vacuum of space, however it is conceived of, is the environment in which this speed has been measured.

It doesn't matter what is contained within that space, the speed of light is at its greatest there.

Of course, this begs a question: Is there a truly empty space somewhere, and would light travel faster in that environment?
User avatar
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 2116
Joined: May 25th, 2013, 8:41 pm

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

First, sorry about being off by a factor of 1,000 as my memory isn't 100%.

It's natural to ask what experiment established the speed of light to be about 300,000 km/s? So I did an internet check and turned up this article: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/R ... light.html

As it turns out, that speed was agreed upon at a 1983 conference. The article talks about Dayton Miller and the ether/aether and many things in a nontechnical way that many can enjoy reading.

My opinion is that many things are going on at CERN and elsewhere so I would expect many forthcoming announcements. In the meantime, if you want to philosophize about a perfect vacuum's effect on the speed of light, feel free to do so.

PhilX
Mechsmith
Posts: 210
Joined: October 27th, 2013, 5:09 pm

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by Mechsmith »

Well PhilX, The important thing about the speed of light is that is the speed that nothing can go faster than. Consequently it is a constant called "c". It is "a" constant not constant but since we can call it a constant we can use it as a basis for time.

Since we know that light responds to a gravity well and that light cannot go any faster than "c" so therefore as light is "blue shifted" to an observer at the bottom of a gravity well then it is time that must change. The speed of time therefore is affected by gravity.

So it it a simple fact that light travels at about 300,000 KMsec or 186,000 miles per second that determines the length of our second. At some point the accelerations acting on this light will result it's being "blue shifted" somewhere towards the infinitely short wavelength. Then we have (to us) a "black hole" (red shifted towards infinite long wavelength),since no energy can escape that region of spacetime. In a massive black hole the temperatures and pressures will be so great that nothing can move. Since time is a measurement of rate of change this is the point where time stops. This also is probably where gravity stops also.

As to determining the speed of light itself this has been done both experimentally and theoretically with reasonable correlation betwixt the two methods.

The thing that has been hardest to wrap my head around is the (probably) fact that the speed of light doesn't change. It's actually the speed of time that changes. This change is caused by mass-gravity. But when you understand that then the universe itself becomes a bit more understandable. After all it's a rather simple mechanical device. Just BIG :!: Relative to us, of course :D Life and women are less understandable. Best, M
The Truth
Posts: 165
Joined: August 10th, 2012, 2:05 pm

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by The Truth »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Note the parentheses. Currently the speed of light is said to be about 300,000 meters per second. I have no problem with the number. It's the vacuum part I have a problem with.

There is no such thing as a perfect vacuum. Never was and never will be. So the speed of light, at best, must be theoretical. How do we determine what the actual speed of light is to exact precision without a vacuum to work with?

PhilX
The speed of light is always C, and it doesn't matter whether it's traveling through a vacuum or through any other medium. Photons always travel at C.

What slows light down is the absorption and re-emission of the photons as they travel through a given medium. But wherever you have an actual photon, it will always be traveling at C. Although technically a perfect vacuum is space that's devoid of stuff, it's more aptly thought of, as the space in between the stuff.
User avatar
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 2116
Joined: May 25th, 2013, 8:41 pm

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

From The Truth:

"What slows light down is the absorption and re-emission of the photons as they travel through a given medium."

This I knew already.

Let's say we have this situation:

We have a room with an aquarium with clear glass, air and water. Let's say the room is dark and there's light in the water with a white rock at the bottom. Some of the rays of the light travel through the water and get reflected off the rock back through the water, then goes through the glass, then goes through the air finally reaching our eyes/brain.

A few questions based on this scenario:

1) Do the photons lose strenghth as they go through each medium?

2) Why does the rock appear the same out of the water as it does inside? (assuming you don't see a refraction - this assumes you turn on a room light once the rock is out of the water)

PhilX
Logicus
Posts: 865
Joined: September 20th, 2012, 10:22 pm

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by Logicus »

What do you mean by "strength"?

The rock looks the same for two reasons:

It is viewed by reflected light, and your eye/brain makes automatic color corrections under different lighting.
User avatar
HZY
Posts: 261
Joined: January 30th, 2013, 11:09 pm

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by HZY »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Note the parentheses. Currently the speed of light is said to be about 300,000 meters per second. I have no problem with the number. It's the vacuum part I have a problem with.

There is no such thing as a perfect vacuum. Never was and never will be. So the speed of light, at best, must be theoretical. How do we determine what the actual speed of light is to exact precision without a vacuum to work with?

PhilX
Light is both particle and wave. Once in a perfect vacuum, it will de-vacuum the vacuum and you will have no vacuum again. So impossible.
Forfriends
Posts: 10
Joined: March 16th, 2015, 4:29 am

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by Forfriends »

And what if light is only what we perceive and the atmosphere works as a gigantic lens but the light itself doesn't travel at all? Could it be co relevant conditioning of senses and sensors? The signal is sent to our eyes and eyes reflect this signal back as a projection. Many of things we look at doesn't exist. Rainbow is just one of the examples.
User avatar
Mgrinder
Premium Member
Posts: 904
Joined: February 1st, 2010, 1:24 am
Contact:

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by Mgrinder »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Note the parentheses. Currently the speed of light is said to be about 300,000 meters per second. I have no problem with the number. It's the vacuum part I have a problem with.

There is no such thing as a perfect vacuum. Never was and never will be. So the speed of light, at best, must be theoretical. How do we determine what the actual speed of light is to exact precision without a vacuum to work with?

PhilX
The speed of light in a vacuum is now defined to be exactly 299792458 m/s. A second is also defined to be exactly "the duration of 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom."

This also defines the meter as the distance light travels in a vacuum in 1/299792458 of a second. With these defined exact values, the project is not to measure the speed of light anymore, it's to get a better measurement of a meter by better clocks and better vacuums. look it up.

-- Updated Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:08 pm to add the following --

Just to add a bit to my post after reading you OP more carefully, trying to see what you are getting at with your question. I think what happens is that as you evacuate a chamber and approach a vacuum, the speed of light gets constant beyond our ability to measure any difference. Once you get a decent vacuum, the speed of light you measure is the same as you get when you get a vacuum 100 times better. (I think, can't find a reference) Our instruments aren't good enough to detect a difference.

Hence the speed of light in a vacuum is an extrapolated one (or rather the meter is, since the speed of light is a defined value), kind of like absolute zero is an extrapolated value. As you cool a gas, you hit a practical limit where you can't cool it anymore. The volume of the gas reduces, and the temperature goes down. THe graph of Volume versus Temperature is a line with positive slope. It hits the teperature axis at -273.15 Celcius, as VOlume goes to zero. Image

So absolute zero is an extrapolated value, as is what happens to light speed as you approach a vacuum (sort of, sicne it's an exact, defined value). That answer your question?
Cogito ergo sum
Posts: 174
Joined: June 11th, 2014, 2:32 am
Favorite Philosopher: Karl Popper

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by Cogito ergo sum »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Note the parentheses. Currently the speed of light is said to be about 300,000 meters per second. I have no problem with the number. It's the vacuum part I have a problem with.

There is no such thing as a perfect vacuum. Never was and never will be. So the speed of light, at best, must be theoretical. How do we determine what the actual speed of light is to exact precision without a vacuum to work with?

PhilX

You don't. It's all based of off a close approximation.
User avatar
Niebieskieucho
Posts: 28
Joined: December 20th, 2015, 5:53 am

Re: The speed of light in a (perfect) vacuum

Post by Niebieskieucho »

Speed of light could not be greater if we assume the pure (perfect) vacuum might exist. The universal space contains apart of matter, the medium called ether. Motion, gravity and interactions between physical entities are feasible due to the ether. Space cannot be devoid of ether, because ether is a condition of existence of space. If space could be empty, it meant a perfect insulation, thus no interactions between physical entities could be possible.
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Science”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021