Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics

 Posts: 54
 Joined: May 28th, 2008, 5:31 am
Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
I found this site with post "Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics." The link given proves mathematics and science are absurd. What do you think? Do you think "Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics."
freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/09 ... thematics/
freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/09 ... thematics/

 Posts: 2212
 Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
I think it is absurd to say mathematics and science are absurd and then communicate this to people on a device that exists because of the apparent "absurdity" of mathematics and science.
Also, I think the argument has its root in logic and reason, which have helped us progress "sciences" and allowed great scope and understanding of the world in a causal sense.
Sadly this "poet" has probably not put much thought into this nor studied logic to any degree to better present the point.
There is something to be said about applying abstract language to physical reality. In natural sciences this method has been extremely successful and because of this method, as I said, I can communicate with you now.
Also, I think the argument has its root in logic and reason, which have helped us progress "sciences" and allowed great scope and understanding of the world in a causal sense.
Sadly this "poet" has probably not put much thought into this nor studied logic to any degree to better present the point.
There is something to be said about applying abstract language to physical reality. In natural sciences this method has been extremely successful and because of this method, as I said, I can communicate with you now.
AKA badgerjelly
 Greta
 Site Admin
 Posts: 6965
 Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
It's what poets do  a play on words. One plus one equals two. However, one plus one also equals one, as in one single number  the number two. Claiming the disproves mathematics might be a satire of philosophy's penchant for playing with words, or perhaps the poet is making the timehonoured statement that "all is one"?
 Felix
 Posts: 2001
 Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
In erotic mathematics, that is the usual solution: 2 become 1. But 2 can also become 3: 1 (male) + 1 (female) > 1 (child) = 3
In conventional mathematics, mental contraceptives are mandatory.
In conventional mathematics, mental contraceptives are mandatory.
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are."  Anaïs Nin

 Posts: 54
 Joined: May 28th, 2008, 5:31 am
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
The paper also shows a finite number = a nonfinite number thus maths is inconsistent.
Proof mathematics is inconsistent
A finite number is not a nonfinite number
And it negation
A finite number= a nonfinite number
It be proven that
1= 0.999…
Let be x = 0.999..
10x = 9.999…
10xx =9.999… 0.999…
9x=9
x= 1
But that proof thus shows a finite number be equal to a nonfinite number thus a contradiction in terms thus mathematics ends in contradiction

 Posts: 47
 Joined: July 19th, 2016, 11:25 am
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
It maybe absurd in general (in global), but it is not in local. Math as a whole thing without bounds is probably absurd, it is not news. Each branch of math is a solid, exact, and valuable thing. For example, 2=2 in Arithmetic, and 2=1 in BanachTarski paradox. The last equality is not of an arithmetic type. But once it is treated as an equality in Arithemitc one gets an absurd. This situation is pretty common for nonmath people, for poets in particular, to mess up different concepts in math and get absurd.gimal wrote:I found this site with post "Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics." The link given proves mathematics and science are absurd. What do you think?
 Present awareness
 Posts: 1255
 Joined: February 3rd, 2014, 7:02 pm
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
The flaw in the above proof is if x=.999 then 9x would equal 8.991 and not 9, as shown. Subtracting .999 from 10x, does not diminish x's value in any way.
Even though you can see me, I might not be here.

 Posts: 54
 Joined: May 28th, 2008, 5:31 am
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
there is no flaw in the proof.The flaw in the above proof is if x=.999 then 9x would equal 8.991 and not 9, as shown. Subtracting .999 from 10x, does not diminish x's value in any way.
Let be x = 0.999..
10x = 9.999…
10xx =9.999… 0.999…
9x=9
x= 1
But that proof thus shows a finite number be equal to a nonfinite number thus a contradiction in terms thus mathematics ends in contradiction
 Updated Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:12 pm to add the following 
any one can see nonmaths people or maths people or poets.Each branch of math is a solid, exact, and valuable thing... This situation is pretty common for nonmath people, for poets in particular, to mess up different concepts in math and get absurd.
It be said that 1+1=2 be a certain truth
Blah
1 number + 1 number = 1 number
1 number (2) +1 number (2) =1 number (4)
So 1 +1=2
And
1 + 1 = 1
Thus a contradiction in mathematics
 Present awareness
 Posts: 1255
 Joined: February 3rd, 2014, 7:02 pm
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
9 multiplied by .999 ( the value of x) does not equal 9.
1 apple, plus 1 apple = 2 apples You may call it "one" group of two apples perhaps or two apples represented by one number (the number two) but it doesn't change the reality of the situation.
1 apple, plus 1 apple = 2 apples You may call it "one" group of two apples perhaps or two apples represented by one number (the number two) but it doesn't change the reality of the situation.
Even though you can see me, I might not be here.

 Posts: 54
 Joined: May 28th, 2008, 5:31 am
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
as can be seen there is no flaw in the proof.9 multiplied by .999 ( the value of x) does not equal 9.
the maths does not lie
Let be x = 0.999..
10x = 9.999…
10xx =9.999… 0.999…
9x=9
x= 1
But that proof thus shows a finite number be equal to a nonfinite number thus a contradiction in terms thus mathematics ends in contradiction
the maths does not lie.1 apple, plus 1 apple = 2 apples You may call it "one" group of two apples perhaps or two apples represented by one number (the number two) but it doesn't change the reality of the situation.
It be said that 1+1=2 be a certain truth
but
1+1=1
1 number +1 number=1number
It be said that 1+1=2 be a certain truth
Blah
1 number + 1 number = 1 number
1 number (2) +1 number (2) =1 number (4)
So 1 +1=2
And
1 + 1 = 1
Thus a contradiction in mathematics
 Updated Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:18 pm to add the following 
Each view contains within it its negation as all views end in meaninglessnessI started a post at.W.H. NewtonSmith, THE RATIONALITY OF SCIENCE, 1981, p. 229
Thus once we admit an inconsistency into our theory we have to admit everything …onlinephilosophyclub.com/forums/viewtop ... mp;t=14285Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
no one has disproved the proofs given by the poet that maths and science are absurd.
you can read the poets paper here.gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wpconten ... ssible.pdfall things are possible
In this post
the poet uses this absurdity to argue.thus with the absurdity of mathematics and science.
“W.H. NewtonSmith, THE RATIONALITY OF SCIENCE, 1981, p. 229 states
…if a theory is inconsistent it will contain every sentence of the language …
Thus once we admit an inconsistency into our theory we have to admit everything …
”the poet concludesThe system of mathematics contains everything it containes each sentence of the theory's language and its negation ....it is possible to prove anything and everything it is possible to prove Fermat's Last Theorem and it is possible to prove the negation of Fermat's Last Theorem
The system of science contains everything it containes each sentence of the theory's language and its negation.... It means it is possible to prove Einsteins theory of relativity and it is possible to prove the negation of Einsteins theory of relativity and there is a negation the Brans–Dicke theoryEach view contains within it its negation as all views end in meaninglessness ... Thus once we admit an inconsistency into our theory we have to admit everything

 Posts: 55
 Joined: December 17th, 2013, 6:36 pm
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
It should read:
1 number (1) + 1 number (1) = 1 number (2).
if, by the same logic:
1 number (1) + 1 number (1) = 1 number (2).
if, by the same logic:
1 number (2) + 1 number (2) = 1 number (4).

 Posts: 54
 Joined: May 28th, 2008, 5:31 am
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
either way the poet has proven maths ends in absurdity.It should read:
1 number (1) + 1 number (1) = 1 number (2).
if, by the same logic:
1 number (2) + 1 number (2) = 1 number (4).
thus
thusThus once we admit an inconsistency into our theory we have to admit everything
The system of mathematics contains everything it containes each sentence of the theory's language and its negation ....it is possible to prove anything and everything it is possible to prove Fermat's Last Theorem and it is possible to prove the negation of Fermat's Last Theorem
Each view contains within it its negation as all views end in meaninglessness ... Thus once we admit an inconsistency into our theory we have to admit everything

 Posts: 55
 Joined: December 17th, 2013, 6:36 pm
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
Quite right. There's no truth! Only if that's right then it's also wrong. You see the problem!

 Posts: 54
 Joined: May 28th, 2008, 5:31 am
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
no problem at allQuite right. There's no truth! Only if that's right then it's also wrong. You see the problem!
[/quote]Thus once we admit an inconsistency into our theory we have to admit everything
as the poet says.
Now with the inconsistency of mathematics and science all possible realities/theories and their negation are now possible and equally valid Thus we have now that all theories are now valid and the meanings these theories give to the observation are all valid
 Updated Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:03 am to add the following 
to be precise the poet is not talking about truth he is talking about validity.Quite right. There's no truth! Only if that's right then it's also wrong. You see the problem!
Valid
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/valid
4. Logic
a. Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be derived: a valid argument.
b. Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise: a valid conclusion.

 Posts: 55
 Joined: December 17th, 2013, 6:36 pm
Re: Australia’s leading erotic poet disproves mathematics
That doesn't make sense at all. You quote the quote:
valid and actual,
possibly valid but not actual,
and invalid  neither possible nor actual.
I can see why all possible realities are possible, but by definition they cannot be equally valid. Some possibilities occur, and others not  even though they are possible. Surely something that occurs in reality is more valid than something that might only have possibly occurred. This infers at least three distinct and unequal levels of validity:Now with the inconsistency of mathematics and science all possible realities/theories and their negation are now possible and equally valid.
valid and actual,
possibly valid but not actual,
and invalid  neither possible nor actual.