Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.
Post Reply
Moreno
Posts: 150
Joined: December 13th, 2011, 7:23 pm

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Moreno »

Roel wrote:I see many very good debunkings and videos by sceptics in all kinds of subjects, and I consider them as intelligent, critical people. However I see an attitude to want to debunk everything, even if it's possible that something is actually real. A good example is the 4chan murderer of which people first thought he was acting with his girlfriend, until the police discovered her body in his house.
I rarely see an attitude to debunk everything. This is a very hard position to hold, since one cannot assert things. If you debunk everything, what criteria do you have left to debunk with?
There is also the "Bible code" theory which, although not giving full proof is very convincing, but if you consider all instances in which the prediction comes true as cpincidence, how can yoh eved prove it to be true?

If you have a bias that something is fake, can you still be a good sceptic?
Most humans, in reality, are skeptical about some things, to varying degrees, and not skeptical about other things. If you have beliefs, then you are skeptical about beliefs that contradict your beliefs. Active skeptics question and probe people who have certain beliefs and tend not to question and probe people who have beliefs the skeptics share.
Eduk
Posts: 2466
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Eduk »

Active skeptics question and probe people who have certain beliefs and tend not to question and probe people who have beliefs the skeptics share.
I'm sorry are you suggesting that all skeptics aren't actually skeptics?
Unknown means unknown.
Moreno
Posts: 150
Joined: December 13th, 2011, 7:23 pm

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Moreno »

Eduk wrote:
Active skeptics question and probe people who have beliefs and tend not to question and probe people who have beliefs the skeptics share.
I'm sorry are you suggesting that all skeptics aren't actually skeptics?
No problem. I would say most skeptics are not skeptics in any binary sense. For example, most people who are skeptics are materialists/physicalists and will tend to NOT be skeptical about the beliefs and assertions of other materialists/physicalists remotely as actively as they are about the beliefs of people who do not fit in that category. I am sure there are some people who really aim skepticism in all directions. I think that state has its own challenges but it is also very rare.
Eduk
Posts: 2466
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Eduk »

Scientific skepticism – the application of skeptical philosophy, critical thinking skills, and knowledge of science and its methods to empirical claims, while remaining agnostic or neutral to non-empirical claims (except those that directly impact the practice of science)
That is more or less how I would define a skeptic. This may be different from your definition?
Could you give me one example of a common skeptical belief which is not questioned by skeptics and is also an incorrect belief not based on critical thinking and empirical claims?
Unknown means unknown.
Togo1
Posts: 541
Joined: September 23rd, 2015, 9:52 am

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Togo1 »

I'm curious as to this definition, since it seems that scientific sceptics are not sceptical about claims around science.

Which would make a lot of sense, given that one of the issues that comes up with scientific sceptics is what emperical evidence can, and can't, support as a claim.
Eduk
Posts: 2466
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Eduk »

It's not an assumption that the scientific method works. Unless it's also an assumption that I am writing this message in a computer. Science demonstrably works.
Can you think of anything that is false that is assumed to be true? Or anything that is true that is assumed to be false? According to scientific scepticism.
Unknown means unknown.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by LuckyR »

There is a difference between skepticism and being contrary. YouTube conspiracy videos are populated more by the latter.
"As usual... it depends."
Togo1
Posts: 541
Joined: September 23rd, 2015, 9:52 am

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Togo1 »

Eduk wrote:It's not an assumption that the scientific method works. Unless it's also an assumption that I am writing this message in a computer. Science demonstrably works.
Can you think of anything that is false that is assumed to be true? Or anything that is true that is assumed to be false? According to scientific scepticism.
I'm not sure what you're asking. There are plenty of famous scientific sceptics, such as Pete Medewar, who claim that empericism, being the only form of knowledge subject to proof, is the only form of knowledge, and that all other knowledge reduces to science. While I can see that this is an interesting claim, it doesn't really stand up to scruntiny.

Similarly there are a great many other philosphical positions, such as positivism, that will manifest as scientific scepticism. Neither of these positions are scepticism per se, but rather positions that are held by scientific sceptics. Scepticism itself is fairly safe, because it a process that commits the speaker to almost no positive beliefs, but it's an incomplete position. In practice it's not particularly easy to combine it with other positions to form a coherant world-view, because it raises the bar of justification quite so high.
Eduk
Posts: 2466
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Eduk »

I'm not familiar with Medewar's claims on empiricism. I did a quick Google search to no avail. Can you provide a reference? Is this the best example of something all sceptics agree with without using scepticism. Scientific scepticism that is. You state Medewar's claim doesn't stand up to scrutiny, are you able to be more precise?
To be clear I am talking about scientific scepticism as I attempted to provide a definition of. Philosophical scepticism is a completely different thing.
Unknown means unknown.
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Felix »

I'm not familiar with Medewar's claims on empiricism
He was a disciple of Karl Popper, so I think they share the same perspective re: science.
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
Eduk
Posts: 2466
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Eduk »

You seem to be being deliberately vague. I can read Karl Popper but I will be no closer to working out which bit (or bits) you feel sceptics aren't being sceptical about.

Do you feel that precision is a useful attribute when discussing with other people?
Unknown means unknown.
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Felix »

Eduk, Togo1 is the one who brought up Peter Medawar, I was just trying to be helpful, but I suppose just referencing Medawar's mentor Karl Popper didn't help much.

Popper was a physicalist (I think that's the right label) and asserted that the final proof of knowledge is that it can be falsified by empirical evidence - by observable phenomena. Any opinion, theory, etc., which cannot be thus falsified is not knowledge but mere opinion. So he would have been a committed skeptic about, say, a theory that could only be confirmed by rational analysis and/or argument alone.
Eduk: It's not an assumption that the scientific method works.
The assumption would be the one that Karl Popper made, and presumably Peter Medawar too, which is that the scientific method is the only assured path to knowledge.
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
Togo1
Posts: 541
Joined: September 23rd, 2015, 9:52 am

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Togo1 »

Eduk wrote:I'm not familiar with Medewar's claims on empiricism. I did a quick Google search to no avail. Can you provide a reference?
'fraid not. Unless you want to buy his book.
Eduk wrote:Is this the best example of something all sceptics agree with without using scepticism. Scientific scepticism that is.
Why would all sceptics need to agree?

I think we may be talking at cross purposes. Youre talking about the position of scientific scepticism itself, which I've already suggested is relatively blameless, albiet a bit narrow. The issue is that it is rare a person to take such a narrow view and confine oneself to very very limited claims. Or to put it another way, it is rare for scientific scepticism to form the whole of a person's position in practice.
Eduk wrote:You state Medewar's claim doesn't stand up to scrutiny, are you able to be more precise?
Yes, his position, as I understand it is that there are no limits to science, because beyond science are merely airy assertions of no practical value. All knowledge is science, because anything beyond science is not really knowledge.

Given that he's rejecting non-scientific claims, rather than being neutral towards them, he probably wouldn't fall under your definition, despite describing himself as a scientific sceptic. That's merely a disagreement over terminology between you and him though, assuming you would see that position as some form of scepticism other than the scientific.
Eduk
Posts: 2466
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Eduk »

Apologies Felix I didn't notice that it wasn't Togo1 who had replied.

Togo1. Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought you were originally agreeing with Moreno
Active skeptics question and probe people who have certain beliefs and tend not to question and probe people who have beliefs the skeptics share.
You seemed to echo that by saying
I'm curious as to this definition, since it seems that scientific sceptics are not sceptical about claims around science.
But now you are saying
it is rare a person to take such a narrow view and confine oneself to very very limited claims. Or to put it another way, it is rare for scientific scepticism to form the whole of a person's position in practice.
This I agree with. No one is perfect. Everyone has bias. Everyone makes assumptions. The trick is to make as few and small assumptions as possible and find ways to mitigate against them.

Regarding requiring falsifiability before considering something a scientific theory. That seems reasonable to me? I can't think of anything which I know which doesn't fit into this requirement?
Unknown means unknown.
Moreno
Posts: 150
Joined: December 13th, 2011, 7:23 pm

Re: Are sceptics sometimes irrational?

Post by Moreno »

Eduk wrote:
Scientific skepticism – the application of skeptical philosophy, critical thinking skills, and knowledge of science and its methods to empirical claims, while remaining agnostic or neutral to non-empirical claims (except those that directly impact the practice of science)
That is more or less how I would define a skeptic. This may be different from your definition?
Could you give me one example of a common skeptical belief which is not questioned by skeptics and is also an incorrect belief not based on critical thinking and empirical claims?
Was this directed at me?
I'll assume so, but if I am wrong pardon my intrusion.

I am using skeptic/skepticism in the philsophical sense which would mean that it is a critical doubting attitude (being directed at some set of beliefs or potentially all assertions and beliefs. The definition you quote is interesting since it describes a skeptic who would remain neutral, rather than skeptical, when reacting to non-empirical claims. Such as the existence of God, say - as long as the person is not saying that their belief or assertion is based on empirical claims. I rarely encounter that kind of skeptic.
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Science”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021