Absolute temperatures, efficiency>100%, definitions, limits

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.
Post Reply
User avatar
Skakos
Posts: 452
Joined: November 17th, 2012, 12:53 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Shestov
Location: Athens, Greece
Contact:

Absolute temperatures, efficiency>100%, definitions, limits

Post by Skakos »

Image

What is normal to most people in winter has so far been impossible in physics: a minus temperature. On the Celsius scale minus temperatures are only surprising in summer. On the absolute temperature scale, which is used by physicists and is also called the Kelvin scale, it is not possible to go below zero. Physicists at the Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich and the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics in Garching have now created an atomic gas in the laboratory that nonetheless has negative Kelvin values ("http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.1227831").

These negative absolute temperatures have several apparently absurd consequences: although the atoms in the gas attract each other and give rise to a negative pressure, the gas does not collapse – a behaviour that is also postulated for dark energy in cosmology. What is more, atoms in this “negative temperature” are more hot than any set of atoms in infinite positive temperatures! Ans this does end here: supposedly impossible heat engines such as a combustion engine with a thermodynamic efficiency of over 100% can also be realised with the help of negative absolute temperatures. (huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/04/absolute- ... 04666.html) (phys.org/news/2013-01-atoms-negative-ab ... ttest.html)

Science has always been setting "limits". Limits to temperatures, limits to numbers (remember the case of imaginary numbers), limits to efficiency, limits to the Universe, limits to the speed of light... And people who thought otherwise were considered insane and ridiculed. How many times were people's carreers desctroyed because they thought that a thermal machine with efficiency > 100% could be built? "Discoveries" like these remind us of a simple truth: that we are the ones who set the limits. These limits are in our mind. And it is up to us to overcome them...
~ το γὰρ αὐτὸ νοεῖν ἐστίν τε καὶ εἶναι ~

Harmonia Philosophica - Philosophy portal against dogmatism of any kind, religious & scientific alike... http://harmoniaphilosophica.wordpress.com/
Teh
Posts: 424
Joined: November 22nd, 2012, 6:59 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Absolute temperatures, efficiency>100%, definitions, lim

Post by Teh »

How embarrassing! Probably best to at least consult wikipedia before you post about things you haven't a clue about:

wiki/Negative_temperature
User avatar
Naughtorious
Posts: 732
Joined: November 26th, 2012, 4:45 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Silence

Re: Absolute temperatures, efficiency>100%, definitions, lim

Post by Naughtorious »

I'm going to produce a new type of cereal: Skank O's. It will be dirty, a waste of time and it will make a lot of people become INFURIATED by its zero substance.
Those who don't want to die are valueless lies; and those who don't mind death are valuable assets.
Cronos988
Posts: 347
Joined: April 25th, 2011, 7:11 am

Re: Absolute temperatures, efficiency>100%, definitions, lim

Post by Cronos988 »

Skakos wrote: Science has always been setting "limits".
Defining a scale is not stating that there is a limit. Furthermore, stating that there is a limit is not the same as setting a limit. The one is a statement about what is, the other is a statement about what ought to be.
User avatar
Skakos
Posts: 452
Joined: November 17th, 2012, 12:53 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Shestov
Location: Athens, Greece
Contact:

Re: Absolute temperatures, efficiency>100%, definitions, lim

Post by Skakos »

Teh wrote:How embarrassing! Probably best to at least consult wikipedia before you post about things you haven't a clue about:

wiki/Negative_temperature
Could you at least write a line or two of what you mean? In the wiki you posted it states rather clearly in the beginning: "still warmer than absolute zero".

Haven't you read it before posting? 8)

Have you been taught in school, high school or any university that we can create a machine with thermodynamic efficiency of over 100% as the articles I posted say?

Please. Elaborate.

-- Updated January 27th, 2013, 12:50 pm to add the following --
Cronos988 wrote: (Nested quote removed.)


Defining a scale is not stating that there is a limit. Furthermore, stating that there is a limit is not the same as setting a limit. The one is a statement about what is, the other is a statement about what ought to be.
We so far said that one cannot build a machine with a thermodynamic efficiency of over 100%. This is a LIMIT. A limit set by our theories, which are based on our axioms.
~ το γὰρ αὐτὸ νοεῖν ἐστίν τε καὶ εἶναι ~

Harmonia Philosophica - Philosophy portal against dogmatism of any kind, religious & scientific alike... http://harmoniaphilosophica.wordpress.com/
MazerRackhem
Posts: 154
Joined: February 13th, 2013, 9:19 pm

Re: Absolute temperatures, efficiency>100%, definitions, lim

Post by MazerRackhem »

You have to be very careful about what you mean with each of your terms. 1st the negative temperature you describe is achieved via a very special quantum state in which the system actually loses entropy (disorder) as additional energy is added to the system. This is because there are more particles in higher quantum states then there are in lower states. However, this does not under any circumstances imply that the Kinetic Energy of the system (which is what is generally referred to when discussing Temperature) is negative. In fact the systems with Negative Kelvin temperatures actually have so much energy it flows from them to the positive Kelvin systems, so the Negative Temperature systems are physically hotter than the positive ones. The system is considered to be at a negative Temperature on the Kelvin scale (due to quantum states) while still possessing a positive quantity of Kinetic (and therefore available) energy. The Kelvin scale is set up to measure the point at which quantum particles have reached there lowest state as Zero, however in certain very odd circumstances this measure can yield a negative value do to the situation I described above.

The laws of thermodynamics however remain firmly in place and a Carnot Engine still can not perform above (or even at) 100% efficiency. You talk about engine's performing at greater that 100% efficiency and this too is possible. Refrigeration engines (Air Conditioners, Food Fridges, etc.) preform at much greater that 100% efficiency from a thermodynamics perspective. This is actually a consequence, not a violation of Carnot's laws. Since supplying HEAT is inefficient it takes less energy to cool something (remove heat) than to supply it. Thus a refrigerator can cool a space at much greater than 100% efficiency, but to reheat the same space to the previous temperature will involve an engine far below 100% efficiency as measure against the perfect Carnot engine.

In short, although Negative Kelvin temperatures can be created in the lab they do not allow the extraction of any energy for mechanical purposes in violation with the LoT since the Kinetic Energy is always positive (in fact systems with Negative K temps actually are hotter than those with positive K temps since the heat flows from Negative to Positive system). Such seeming inconsistencies are nothing new to physics and do not undermine its laws. For another instance it is a relativity straightforward thing to model an electromagnetic wave so that the group velocity of the wave exceeds the speed of light. This does not violate relativity however since no mass or information is carried by the group velocity waveform. Such concepts are fun to play with but we can't let them muddle our understanding of the way the world truly works.
User avatar
Skakos
Posts: 452
Joined: November 17th, 2012, 12:53 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Shestov
Location: Athens, Greece
Contact:

Re: Absolute temperatures, efficiency>100%, definitions, lim

Post by Skakos »

I see what you mean although I am not sure things are so "clear". Science is sometimes over-using defintions and this does add up to the confusion. Up to a point we knew that energy can only be "positive" but now we know that there is a kind of exotic form of energy which is "negative". The same applies with the temperatures. And even though a refrigerator can cool a place with efficiency more than 100%, the article for the "negative temperatures" advertised the "new found >100% efficiency". Who is to blame here? Is it something the article writers did on purpose? Or not?

I am saying that in a place (call me Science) where everything is based on defintions, it is really scary to be so adherent to the validity of some "truths" (which are actually defintions) and then when it is to our interest simply claim "Ok, this can change. Why not?" with disarming innocence...
~ το γὰρ αὐτὸ νοεῖν ἐστίν τε καὶ εἶναι ~

Harmonia Philosophica - Philosophy portal against dogmatism of any kind, religious & scientific alike... http://harmoniaphilosophica.wordpress.com/
MazerRackhem
Posts: 154
Joined: February 13th, 2013, 9:19 pm

Re: Absolute temperatures, efficiency>100%, definitions, lim

Post by MazerRackhem »

Skakos wrote: Up to a point we knew that energy can only be "positive" but now we know that there is a kind of exotic form of energy which is "negative". The same applies with the temperatures. And even though a refrigerator can cool a place with efficiency more than 100%, the article for the "negative temperatures" advertised the "new found >100% efficiency". Who is to blame here? Is it something the article writers did on purpose? Or not?
Although Mathematicians have played around with the concepts of negative mass and negative energy for many decades I am unaware of any physical experiments which suggest such exotic quantities exist (I have already explained above how negative temperatures are not actually negative in the classical sense). To my knowledge what you are describing is much like the mythical Tachion particle which travels faster than light. Science fiction writers and mathematicians have worked out its properties with alarming accuracy, however no experiment has ever suggested the existence of such a particle. Furthermore, although it was initially found not to disobey any laws of relativity, recent experiments and theoretical work suggest that such a particle cannot exist in reality.

Or when you speak of Negative Energy are you referring perhaps to the continued expansion of the universe and the concept of either 'dark' energy or of an unknown impelling force which drives expansion? Astrophysicists and cosmologists have played around with these concepts to great effect, however neither of these represents a true negative energy. Perhaps you could link some of these articles you refer to. I personally am unaware of any kind of negative energy as you describe it.
Keen
Posts: 176
Joined: July 18th, 2010, 3:38 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russel

Re: Absolute temperatures, efficiency>100%, definitions, lim

Post by Keen »

The limits in science just translate the observations made during experiments. If someone finds an object with negative temperature, then the laws of thermodynamics should be revised and a new theory, that would explain better the observed phenomena, should be invented, but as long as they are compatible with what is observed, we can consider them as true.
User avatar
Skakos
Posts: 452
Joined: November 17th, 2012, 12:53 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Shestov
Location: Athens, Greece
Contact:

Re: Absolute temperatures, efficiency>100%, definitions, lim

Post by Skakos »

MazerRackhem wrote: (Nested quote removed.)


Although Mathematicians have played around with the concepts of negative mass and negative energy for many decades I am unaware of any physical experiments which suggest such exotic quantities exist (I have already explained above how negative temperatures are not actually negative in the classical sense). To my knowledge what you are describing is much like the mythical Tachion particle which travels faster than light. Science fiction writers and mathematicians have worked out its properties with alarming accuracy, however no experiment has ever suggested the existence of such a particle. Furthermore, although it was initially found not to disobey any laws of relativity, recent experiments and theoretical work suggest that such a particle cannot exist in reality.

Or when you speak of Negative Energy are you referring perhaps to the continued expansion of the universe and the concept of either 'dark' energy or of an unknown impelling force which drives expansion? Astrophysicists and cosmologists have played around with these concepts to great effect, however neither of these represents a true negative energy. Perhaps you could link some of these articles you refer to. I personally am unaware of any kind of negative energy as you describe it.
I have opened a dedicated thread for the speed of light at onlinephilosophyclub.com/forums/viewtop ... amp;t=8657.

As far as negative energy is concerned, this is the energy of negative mass. Surely I got too far claiming that "we know of negative energy". It is much of a hypothetical thing now. But negative absolute temperatures were also hypothetical and even impossible... As did many other things (see imaginary numbers for example)

I read (from a "forbidden site"): "In general relativity, negative mass is generalized to refer to any region of space in which for some observers the mass density is measured to be negative. This can occur due to negative mass, or could be a region of space in which the stress component of the Einstein stress-energy tensor is larger in magnitude than the mass density. All of these are violations of one or another variant of the positive energy condition of Einstein's general theory of relativity; however, the positive energy condition is not a required condition for the mathematical consistency of the theory"...

Maybe its all a matter of definition. :wink:
~ το γὰρ αὐτὸ νοεῖν ἐστίν τε καὶ εἶναι ~

Harmonia Philosophica - Philosophy portal against dogmatism of any kind, religious & scientific alike... http://harmoniaphilosophica.wordpress.com/
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Science”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021