Is art important?

Use this forum to have philosophical discussions about aesthetics and art. What is art? What is beauty? What makes art good? You can also use this forum to discuss philosophy in the arts, namely to discuss the philosophical points in any particular movie, TV show, book or story.
User avatar
Ascendant606
Posts: 102
Joined: March 9th, 2013, 6:34 am
Location: Ohio

Is art important?

Post by Ascendant606 »

Is art vital to society? Do we really need art? What purpose does it serve?

Are all types of art equally important? Are songs more important than paintings, or the other way around?

I find creating art to be enjoyable and even therapeutic to a certain extent so I value art on a personal level, but is there any reason to hang art in museums or for people who have no personal connection to art place value in it?
I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance.
User avatar
Didge
New Trial Member
Posts: 4
Joined: January 9th, 2014, 10:14 am

Re: Is art important?

Post by Didge »

Ascendant606 wrote: but is there any reason to hang art in museums
good pictures, which hang in museums, full of energy and mysticism, which can give something to the viewer :shock:
ALOPIALL
Posts: 9
Joined: March 6th, 2014, 4:09 am

Re: Is art important?

Post by ALOPIALL »

This question rests on top of another and that is "do you consider emotions important?".

Art is very emotional, no matter what kind of art it is each appeals to a certain type of person and each piece in a different way to each viewer. No art is more important than any other because the importance is determined by the individual it impacts and not by society as a whole.

You could only classify art as unimportant if you classified emotions unimportant.
Dustin
Posts: 11
Joined: March 25th, 2014, 9:39 pm

Re: Is art important?

Post by Dustin »

Art liberates a free open expression of a persons deepest passions desires and memories. Often times when observing a persons art we feel more connected to the person than we would if we met them face to face. Yet we need not be either intimidated or offended. Art is a medium of creation we need not fear, there is no harm that can come by it. But it is sufficient to exercise the spirit and mind for more dangerous expression and so, in my opinion, it must be. Or at least, should be
Uncertainty and pain
Posts: 20
Joined: April 10th, 2014, 2:39 am

Re: Is art important?

Post by Uncertainty and pain »

Is art vital to society?
In terms of society as the collective people, I'm not sure that art is required to hold people together or to help express values since alternative methods exist. A simple example would be a doctrine of duty to bind them together in a sort of unity without the need for creative expression.

Do we really need art?
Arguably for merely being alive, no, but for deeply experiencing living, it is heavily recommended rather than necessary.

What purpose does it serve?
Art currently serves many purposes. It can draw interest to an abstracted perspective on issues that would otherwise draw less interest. Examples of ideas of what it can do is: it can help edify; it can help shame and ridicule; it can help pose questions; and can help answer them.

Are all types of art equally important?
Unless they are all meaningless or without value, I'd argue no, based on the varying magnitude of consequences based on things like cultural impact.

Are songs more important than paintings, or the other way around?
I would pose a similar argument to my previous argument.
User avatar
Val Valiant Five
Posts: 110
Joined: May 2nd, 2014, 10:01 am
Favorite Philosopher: Margaret Moth
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Is art important?

Post by Val Valiant Five »

To me,

Art is the end result of wounder. From wounder, to imagination, to creation, to art.

I think wounder is the driving, sparking wheel at the center of sentient thought. In a word, inspiration.

It is not only important, it is integral to what humanity is... and I wounder why that is.

~inspiration breeds inspiration

-- Updated June 4th, 2014, 11:16 am to add the following --

Wonder, not wounder... Please forgive my spelling foibles here. I type like a madman, and many mistakes are made in an effort to say the things I feel compelled to say.
Humanity has been galvanized by the internet. Its' a virtual, neural web of collective consciousness. And in this social-electric state, we all have a say; From the darkest corners of thought to the most enlightened. It's a mirror of all our minds.
dogparktom
Posts: 32
Joined: July 11th, 2009, 4:36 pm
Favorite Philosopher: MICHAEL OAKESHOTT

Re: Is art important?

Post by dogparktom »

Art is important to me because the artist brings beauty into my life.

-- Updated Mon Jan 05, 2015 2:55 pm to add the following --
dogparktom wrote:Art is important to me because the artist brings beauty into my life.
Lloyd Rigler, the founder of Classic Arts Showcase, believed that art was important. I watch the program everyday on Dish. I recently learned that CAS is available online. Check it out. http://www.classicartsshowcase.org/
User avatar
HZY
Posts: 261
Joined: January 30th, 2013, 11:09 pm

Re: Is art important?

Post by HZY »

Ascendant606 wrote:Is art vital to society? Do we really need art? What purpose does it serve?

Are all types of art equally important? Are songs more important than paintings, or the other way around?

I find creating art to be enjoyable and even therapeutic to a certain extent so I value art on a personal level, but is there any reason to hang art in museums or for people who have no personal connection to art place value in it?

The purpose of art is to allow you to reach a altered state of being which you cannot normally reach in your everyday living.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7914
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Is art important?

Post by LuckyR »

Art is a funny thing. Partially because it is several things at once. It is the embodyment of what the artist is trying to express. If this expression is common (say, a love song to express longing) then an audience can experience (through memory recollection) the same or similar emotion to that of the artist. This is not required, though, and there are plenty of examples of cagey artists trying to express A (in a quasi-covert manner) and their work getting a reputation for B.

Art appreciation is usually passive (the artist does the heavy lifting), though we all can get fulfillment through our own activities, whether compensated (work) or uncompensated (play). So it is part of the mix of the part of life that makes it worth living. Required? Not quite. Vital? Definitely.
"As usual... it depends."
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13782
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Is art important?

Post by Belinda »

I think that art is a super-honed ability to communicate ideas or feelings. Art might therefore be ugly, or otherwise unpleasant. Art may be restricted in ways that artists hate.

Nazi or Soviet artists were not allowed to express ideas that the regime disapproved of.

Renaissance artists were paid by popes, cardinals, or other rich people, and it's lucky for consumers of their art that the Church employers and other rich employers were Renaissance people too.

Long ago artists who painted animals and people in deep dark caves are mysterious as to their motives but they obviously were skilled at getting their ideas on to the rocks.

Ancient Egyptian art looks to be deliberately made for recording facts and ideas that were intrinsic to that society.

In all my foregoing examples there is nothing about the artist's personal feelings. The Romantic movement of about the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and still going strong, brought in the belief that personal feelings mattered. You can read in nineteenth century novels how the paying public were becoming more interested in the feelings of characters in the stories and how the authors devoted proportionately fewer words to traditional beliefs and practices.

Greta, does musical history demonstrate how the Romantic theme is still going strong e.g. in jazz, world music, 'serious' music, or commercial pop?
Socialist
Harbal
Posts: 1532
Joined: May 6th, 2013, 4:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Is art important?

Post by Harbal »

Ascendant606 wrote: Are songs more important than paintings,
If you feel like dancing then yes, they are. If you're in the mood for just sitting and staring then they're not. Simple, really.
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Is art important?

Post by Hereandnow »

LuckyR:
Art appreciation is usually passive (the artist does the heavy lifting), though we all can get fulfillment through our own activities, whether compensated (work) or uncompensated (play). So it is part of the mix of the part of life that makes it worth living. Required? Not quite. Vital? Definitely.

Art appreciation is passive? What can this mean? Appreciation entails criticism, what professional critiques write about. It is this conversation they have with each other that brings meaning (and I'm talking about visual arts here, not music, which has limited interpretational possibility) to art. Van Gogh was the father of post impressionism and expressionism, so I have read, and it makes sense. But the hard part, that is, in doing the service of building meaning to the art and the art world, is discussing where his art's value lies. That is the critic's job, and the aesthetician's. Best example is Picasso: The man turns a bike's handle bars upside down and calls it a bull. What gives this Picasso ready made value lies in the thinking and theorizing. That's heavy lifting.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7914
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Is art important?

Post by LuckyR »

Hereandnow wrote:LuckyR:
Art appreciation is usually passive (the artist does the heavy lifting), though we all can get fulfillment through our own activities, whether compensated (work) or uncompensated (play). So it is part of the mix of the part of life that makes it worth living. Required? Not quite. Vital? Definitely.

Art appreciation is passive? What can this mean? Appreciation entails criticism, what professional critiques write about. It is this conversation they have with each other that brings meaning (and I'm talking about visual arts here, not music, which has limited interpretational possibility) to art. Van Gogh was the father of post impressionism and expressionism, so I have read, and it makes sense. But the hard part, that is, in doing the service of building meaning to the art and the art world, is discussing where his art's value lies. That is the critic's job, and the aesthetician's. Best example is Picasso: The man turns a bike's handle bars upside down and calls it a bull. What gives this Picasso ready made value lies in the thinking and theorizing. That's heavy lifting.

I didn't say: "Art appreciation is passive". I said "Art appreciation is USUALLY passive". Huge difference. You are, of course correct that the tiny fraction of art enthusiasts who are professional critics use a lot of effort to perform their criticism, which has some definite value. OTOH, what percentage of a performance's "appreciation" is from critics, hopefully well less than 1%. Thus my use of: "usually".
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Is art important?

Post by Hereandnow »

Oh, I see, LuckyR, and you're right that most people are passive in this, though i can't quite understand your "what percentage of a performance's "appreciation" is from critics, hopefully well less than 1%." The idea that critics have only "some" definite value puzzles me, too. But then it's different for different art: I look at say Picasso's Old Man with Guitar and it's not my art history that informs me as to its value; it's more intuitive and immediate. But then again still, as Nelson Goodman put it, there is no innocent eye, and what seems immediate is actually embedded in orientation. Oh well, that's philosophy: endless analysis.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7914
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Is art important?

Post by LuckyR »

Hereandnow wrote:Oh, I see, LuckyR, and you're right that most people are passive in this, though i can't quite understand your "what percentage of a performance's "appreciation" is from critics, hopefully well less than 1%." The idea that critics have only "some" definite value puzzles me, too. But then it's different for different art: I look at say Picasso's Old Man with Guitar and it's not my art history that informs me as to its value; it's more intuitive and immediate. But then again still, as Nelson Goodman put it, there is no innocent eye, and what seems immediate is actually embedded in orientation. Oh well, that's philosophy: endless analysis.

Well, it's simple, really. Most if not all artists hope to influence many, many patrons/art aficianados with whatever they want their art to accomplish. No one wants to be relegated to the discount bin of Art History. Thus the wider the audience, the smaller (percentage-wise) of that audience are professional art critics. Wouldn't you want thousands to see your piece for every art critic who needed to see it to fulfill their workplace obligation?

It seems your puzzlement at my use of the word "some" was shortlived as you appear to have figured it out in your next sentence.
"As usual... it depends."
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of the Arts and Philosophy in the Arts”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021