Is it true that less is more, in music?
- Felix
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am
Re: Is it true that less is more, in music?
- Subatomic God
- Posts: 1494
- Joined: October 15th, 2013, 11:09 pm
Re: Is it true that less is more, in music?
Silence is important, but so is sound. It's a juxtaposition that envelopes all human life, but because people have a bad habit in choosing sides and aspects, they become cosmically imbalanced. Always balance out the contrasts of the Universe, or you will never learn balance, let alone listen to it
- Mirosurabu
- Posts: 26
- Joined: August 8th, 2013, 8:53 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Nietzsche
- Location: Roman Empire
Re: Is it true that less is more, in music?
This is why they are attracted to simplicity, to going backward: because going forward has become too painful for them.
Let's put an end to this farce once and for all: it is not that less is more but that creating more is too difficult which is why people go back to creating less, not realizing that it is their inability to fuse all the elements into a coherent whole that is the problem and not some external universal rule which prevents them, and not only them but also everyone else, from creating highly complex products.
- Present awareness
- Posts: 1389
- Joined: February 3rd, 2014, 7:02 pm
Re: Is it true that less is more, in music?
In language, it's easy to ramble on and on, but much more difficult to condense your ideas into short concise statements. The same goes for music, a musician may play 40 notes trying to express something which 5 notes played correctly, might convey more effectively. Of course, there are other times when 40 notes just aren't enough to get the message thru.
There's an old saying in reference to public speaking, which goes something like this "try to be funny, but if you can't be funny, be brief". I'm sure that we've all heard a song that goes on for 8 or 16 bars longer then it should, or a speaker whom goes on for 8 or 16 minutes longer the they should. They key in music, painting or public speaking is to know when you are done, and sometimes less really is more.
- Mirosurabu
- Posts: 26
- Joined: August 8th, 2013, 8:53 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Nietzsche
- Location: Roman Empire
Re: Is it true that less is more, in music?
Related to my previous post: men of complexity who hate themselves are men of complexity with poor integrity.
- Polysemicnick
- Posts: 19
- Joined: December 27th, 2014, 6:47 pm
Re: Is it true that less is more, in music?
-- Updated January 5th, 2015, 2:37 am to add the following --
Less notes. More feel
-- Updated January 5th, 2015, 2:45 am to add the following --
And the bass parts. Without irregular 16th note space ( rest) there would be no syncopation. A defining characteristic of funk. Less is more!
-- Updated January 5th, 2015, 3:31 am to add the following --
I've played the black page by Zappa on xylophone which is undoubtably a very complex piece which pushes the limits Of musicianship . Nested polyrhythms etcetera.Sense of achievement , yea. Do I prefer laying down a tight groove Which people can enjoy. Yep
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15154
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Is it true that less is more, in music?
Others place more emphasis on beauty, poignancy, personality, smoothness and clarity in music. When I was young I liked flashy hard rock and the long haired hooligans who perpetrated said music:). Now I prefer the sounds of jazz instrumentation and edgier experimental styles, the best of it being fresh and interesting. Once I would have called it boring and noise.
When functioning within an average gigging band "less is more" is often the unspoken mantra, apart from vocalists, who are very special (take that as you will). If music is a conversation then we allow others in the band the chance to "speak" rather than speaking over them.
Then there's minimalism - anywhere from Steve Reich to the White Stripes. It's a cliche but music just is what it is. If some people think there's too much going on or others think there's not enough, that's just individual feedback, not a verdict.
- Polysemicnick
- Posts: 19
- Joined: December 27th, 2014, 6:47 pm
Re: Is it true that less is more, in music?
-- Updated January 5th, 2015, 5:27 am to add the following --
Oh and less is more is the rule when spreading marmite on toast.
-- Updated January 5th, 2015, 5:29 am to add the following --
So yea like you said, it's a matter of taste
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15154
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Is it true that less is more, in music?
Yes, sophisticated minimalism like the pianos running in and out of phase requires enormous control. There is precious little room for error with those tiny, gradual variations. Even a small mistake in that piece would stick out like the proverbial dogs' balls - and that is the crux of minimalism's challenge.
Agree about Bernard Purdie. Steve Jordan is another of that ilk. They often lay back but everything they do has a touch of magic. It's in their flow, timing, tone and dynamics.
- Polysemicnick
- Posts: 19
- Joined: December 27th, 2014, 6:47 pm
Re: Is it true that less is more, in music?
-- Updated January 5th, 2015, 8:34 am to add the following --
In piano phase,the player holding down the ostinato part had the worst of it. Always a tendency to follow the person speeding up.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023