Dexter: A Man Of The People And/Or Of Himself

Use this forum to have philosophical discussions about aesthetics and art. What is art? What is beauty? What makes art good? You can also use this forum to discuss philosophy in the arts, namely to discuss the philosophical points in any particular movie, TV show, book or story.
User avatar
Homicidal Pacifist
Posts: 569
Joined: July 19th, 2009, 2:42 am
Location: Your mom's house. Ha.

Dexter: A Man Of The People And/Or Of Himself

Post by Homicidal Pacifist »

The Showtime series Dexter is about a serial killer who only kills other serial killers. More than that, he only kills those whome he believes are unrepentant and who will likely continue to kill innocent people.

(I wait for DVD so I haven't seen the season that is currently airing - season 4 I believe - so please limit responses to seasons 1-3 so as to avoid any spoilers. Thanks.)

Some serial killers in the real world have been put to death, others have not. Let's assume that if Dexter was real and was caught by the authorities that he WOULD be sentenced to execution. His murders were somewhat torturous and he has over a hundred victims.

Should he be pardoned either from capital punishment or from any penalty at all given that, though his methods were premeditated and vicious, all his victims were depraved killers of the innocent?

He fills in the cracks that the legal system leaves empty and in doing so, helps protect the "good" members of society from bodily harm. Do note that he kills for his own violent gratification (someone's going to die, better it be a villain than an innocent) and his "Code" was something taught to him that he might not fully respect. In other words, if he did not get a personal violent thrill in killing he would not kill serial killers just to help society.

In a nutshell, should murder only be punishable if the victims were innocents?

Should it be a law against an action (killing), a law against killing certain victims (the innocents), or circumstantial (premeditated murder, self-defense/justifiable homicide, accidental/manslaughter) and where do we draw the line?

Killer show by the way.
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies of the world,
and that is an idea whose time has come."
User avatar
Juice
Posts: 1996
Joined: May 8th, 2009, 10:24 pm

Post by Juice »

HP-I would kill to read your rational reconciliation between your views of life, death and sacrifice and your obvious admiration of Dexter?

I feel like an unwanted step child. :cry:
When everyone looks to better their own future then the future will be better for everyone.

An explanation of cause is not a justification by reason.
C. S. Lewis

Fight the illusion!
User avatar
Homicidal Pacifist
Posts: 569
Joined: July 19th, 2009, 2:42 am
Location: Your mom's house. Ha.

.

Post by Homicidal Pacifist »

Juice -

My admiration of Dexter is strictly from a perspective that is interested in entertainment and philosophical inquiry.

That is to say that the show has a wonderful quality of entertainment and, though I disagree with Dexter's actions, I am glad to have my beliefs challenged and see the other side of the spectrum - so long as it is only fictional people that are being killed.

When I said...

"He fills in the cracks that the legal system leaves empty and in doing so, helps protect the "good" members of society from bodily harm,"

... I was stating a fact and showing other peoples' rationale for lax punishment; I was not endorsing Dexter's killings.

Though I believe it good and vital to help people, to harm them in the process defeats the point. I think it's best to help all people as opposed to only certain people (the "innocent", our loved ones, our nation, etc.).

Now answer the questions. Please.
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies of the world,
and that is an idea whose time has come."
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13782
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Post by Belinda »

In a nutshell, should murder only be punishable if the victims were innocents?
No, because we have to protect the integrity of the law of the land.
Socialist
User avatar
Homicidal Pacifist
Posts: 569
Joined: July 19th, 2009, 2:42 am
Location: Your mom's house. Ha.

.

Post by Homicidal Pacifist »

Belinda -

We only have to protect the law of the land if the law is just.

And as you can see, the law does not even respect itself because capital punishment kills like the killer did. If you murder, we will murder you because murder is wrong. HUH???
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies of the world,
and that is an idea whose time has come."
User avatar
Juice
Posts: 1996
Joined: May 8th, 2009, 10:24 pm

Post by Juice »

HP-Why don't we try to keep astride of the proper and commonly understood definitions of terms. You can hardly be expected to be taken seriously unless you allow people their just due to at least be considered intelligent.

We know that "murder" is a legal term which does not legally apply to capital punishment. Those individuals are legally put to death. Now if you consider being legally put to death murder then that does not obligate me or anyone else to consider it so.

Dexter is a serial killer who once caught will be death penalty eligible. Besides, he's just plain creepy, like Obama. Once again it is the act(s) that are punishable.

I like it that you admit to be entertained by death. May I suggest "Gladiator", or would you like to discuss Aztec mortality rituals?

I believe you miss a very important point in these discussions in that there is a difference between guilt and innocence. There is a fact that most people do not kill innocent people since they know it is morally wrong to do so. There is also a level to which killing is completely morally abhorrent. While Dexter may be seen as hero in some respect and I would venture to say that there is some satisfaction to the victim of his victims next victim that they did not become a victim we have developed a system of justice where every person has a right to face their accusers and have a chance to acquit themselves by doing so. There are distinctions, and as a society we recognize distinctions and correlations.

We understand that there is a difference between killing someone in self defense. We also understand that killing your spouse for the insurance goes beyond reason. How does someone who kills thier spouse for money get rehabilitated?

While I doubt that those so ingrained in the type of philosophy which cannot recognize, understand or decide life and death issues based on distinctions, correlations, reciprocal retribution and Lex Talens, I can only say that society is best for those that do.
Last edited by Juice on November 19th, 2009, 12:15 am, edited 4 times in total.
When everyone looks to better their own future then the future will be better for everyone.

An explanation of cause is not a justification by reason.
C. S. Lewis

Fight the illusion!
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13782
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Post by Belinda »

Homicidal Pacifist, I mean we have to protect the institution of the law of the land. Internal laws are worth protecting, although the worthiness of the laws may conflict with some other considerations such as equality or human rights, or international law.But the law of a land is still worthy of some consideration and protection. In the free west the Law is worthy, and there is quite efficient machinery to keep it so, and to improve it.
Socialist
User avatar
Homicidal Pacifist
Posts: 569
Joined: July 19th, 2009, 2:42 am
Location: Your mom's house. Ha.

.

Post by Homicidal Pacifist »

Belinda -

Sure I will consider the law. But then I will be likely to spit on it.


Juice -

"Dexter is a serial killer who once caught will be death penalty eligible. Besides, he's just plain creepy, like Obama. Once again it is the act(s) that are punishable."

I would not call Obama creepy, but I would call him an asshole.

Yes, Dexter is death penalty eligible. My question is doy you think he should be put to death for his "crimes"?

If the law permitted him to kill as he does, he would not be committing "murder", right? But it would still be the exact same action... killing serial killers.

I mean that is what you have been supporting by supporting the death penalty. Death to those who kill the innocent. And since Dexter only kills the guilty, he is - to some degree - like you and the law.

He is the death penalty incarnate. To kill him is to abolish the death penalty.

Unless you only care about law and not objective truth and morality.

P.S. - I am entertained by FICTIONAL death. Appauled by the other. Fiction violence is a healthy, non-harming release for my violent angst.

And yes, there is a difference between killing in self-defense VS killing for money, etc. And that difference is in motive. But the action remains the same. By the way, the executioner kills for money.
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies of the world,
and that is an idea whose time has come."
User avatar
Juice
Posts: 1996
Joined: May 8th, 2009, 10:24 pm

Post by Juice »

Once again HP you overlook part of the discussion. As I stated a person is entitled to face his accusers, in a court of law, and to be judged accordingly. You also overlook the difference between "guilt" and "innocence". It is obvious that you have a hard line point of view, and despite the fact that you recognize the necessity of death in some circumstances you have a problem with authority. I doubt you would condemn me if I personally executed someone who caused harm to a child. In fact I'm sure you would applaud that action. But, I think you are just anti-establishment. No matter what, to any benefit, the establishment determines anything, you would rebel.

There is a huge difference between death resulting from self defense, killing for personal gain, and executing the orders of the state as part of ones duty.

Obama's creepy, he has no desire to escape the rabbit hole.
When everyone looks to better their own future then the future will be better for everyone.

An explanation of cause is not a justification by reason.
C. S. Lewis

Fight the illusion!
User avatar
Homicidal Pacifist
Posts: 569
Joined: July 19th, 2009, 2:42 am
Location: Your mom's house. Ha.

.

Post by Homicidal Pacifist »

Juice -

I WOULD NOT applaud you for executing a man who harmed or is about to harm a child. I have never said anything that should give you that impression. In fact, I have been stating over and over again how much I disagree with that mentality.

Another reason I enjoy the show Dexter is because I AM tempted to become a murderous Batman. A vigilanty who destroys the lives of the guilty both before and after their offenses.

But everything I have learned about sin, forgiveness, and redemption reminds me to refrain. But it is a hard, on-going battle.

Death is a necessity, murder is not; at least in the life of each individual.

I am only against the establishment when and where the establishment is at fault.

I wish you would answer my earlier points more directly.
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies of the world,
and that is an idea whose time has come."
User avatar
Juice
Posts: 1996
Joined: May 8th, 2009, 10:24 pm

Post by Juice »

HP-We have been over this topic and sensitivity of yours ad infinitum. I only engaged in this Topic since you mentioned "Dexter".

Batman does not kill!

I think I have said enough, anyone who doesn't know that Batman doesn't kill, well it's just downright disappointing.

See you on the flip side. :roll:
When everyone looks to better their own future then the future will be better for everyone.

An explanation of cause is not a justification by reason.
C. S. Lewis

Fight the illusion!
User avatar
Homicidal Pacifist
Posts: 569
Joined: July 19th, 2009, 2:42 am
Location: Your mom's house. Ha.

.

Post by Homicidal Pacifist »

Juice - I was implying that I am tempted to become a murderous version of Batman.

I am a fan of Batman primarily because he DOESN'T kill the villains.
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies of the world,
and that is an idea whose time has come."
User avatar
Juice
Posts: 1996
Joined: May 8th, 2009, 10:24 pm

Post by Juice »

HP-Do you know where he gets all those toys?

I think I should be Batman, and if you change that attitude a little I might just give you a try at Robin! :D

Just tone down the psycho a little. :wink:
When everyone looks to better their own future then the future will be better for everyone.

An explanation of cause is not a justification by reason.
C. S. Lewis

Fight the illusion!
User avatar
Homicidal Pacifist
Posts: 569
Joined: July 19th, 2009, 2:42 am
Location: Your mom's house. Ha.

.

Post by Homicidal Pacifist »

Juice -

I'm much too busy being my own sidekick.

And I broke the psycho switch.
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies of the world,
and that is an idea whose time has come."
Moriarty
Posts: 2
Joined: November 2nd, 2009, 12:33 pm

Re: .

Post by Moriarty »

Homicidal Pacifist wrote:Belinda -

We only have to protect the law of the land if the law is just.

And as you can see, the law does not even respect itself because capital punishment kills like the killer did. If you murder, we will murder you because murder is wrong. HUH???
You've elided two things: the act of murder and the act of killing. The former belongs to the law which allows therefore that whilst capital punishment involves killing it does not constitute murder. Killing is often sanctioned by the State (and its laws) even though murder is not.
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of the Arts and Philosophy in the Arts”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021