Only for eyes and ears?
- Zatoichi
- Posts: 15
- Joined: December 8th, 2011, 10:22 am
Only for eyes and ears?
It can be translated in both ways... You can say that all art has been created for eyes and ears... And art is not something that will fill your belly or make comfortable place for your ass... Or you can say that true art is only what has been created for aesthetics pleasure of (C)creator( without thinking about some other profits )?
- Cyanse
- Posts: 21
- Joined: December 13th, 2011, 9:38 pm
Re: Only for eyes and ears?
- Zatoichi
- Posts: 15
- Joined: December 8th, 2011, 10:22 am
Re: Only for eyes and ears?
I would say for the mind too, but everything that comes from eyes and ears goes throught the mind anyhow... And if it can touch your heart as symbol of feelings too - that is great, but not mondatory...Cyanse wrote: Also it is not just for the eyes and ears but for the heart too.
- DeathByThought
- Posts: 38
- Joined: December 26th, 2009, 7:03 pm
Re: Only for eyes and ears?
- Zatoichi
- Posts: 15
- Joined: December 8th, 2011, 10:22 am
Re: Only for eyes and ears?
A good disign is not a warranty of a comfort of your ass;) - On the contray - the best looking chair will be the most uncomfortable... Of coarse if you took an artist and give him a tech specialist - together they will create combined stuff,but tru artist is lousy technologist - tru artist can only repeat the tech as well as tru inventor can only repeat art...DeathByThought wrote:But what do you think design is? An aesthetically good-looking chair isn't only a utility neither only art. It is both of them combined. A well thought out and practical design is always pleasing to the sense of aesthetic pleasure.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023