Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Use this forum to have philosophical discussions about aesthetics and art. What is art? What is beauty? What makes art good? You can also use this forum to discuss philosophy in the arts, namely to discuss the philosophical points in any particular movie, TV show, book or story.
User avatar
Gremory
New Trial Member
Posts: 4
Joined: August 29th, 2015, 2:15 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Gremory »

This is a difficult question. We do not have any sentence qualified as definite description of art. It is easier to see pornography as a comodity that gives you a lot of money. Indeed, you can get very much money from building a pornography website. We should take into account what makes pornography so interesting that the demands for it is always very high. In my opinion, what is the main interest in pornography is that it stimulates your desire to reproduce. At this point, pornography tells us something, that it is beautiful.

Plato, in Symposium, tells us that the desire to reproduce is what love wants from beauty. But desire to reproduce from particular beautiful body is not good enough to be followed, because a child born from particular beautiful body is going to be deceased one day. We must seek some beautiful soul, so that the child born from it is not vulnerable to death. In the end, Plato tells us to rise from beautiful souls to the beauty in itself which will take us to the true knowledge of beauty.

But there is another point. Kant said beauty presents us with ourself in our morally determined existence. What makes someone judge something as beautiful is someone's good moral judgment, that it fits your cognitive faculty. So, if you see pornography as beautiful, what you see in it is not another person but yourself. That experience, in my opinion, is an experience of art.
User avatar
Whitedragon
Posts: 1100
Joined: November 14th, 2012, 12:12 pm

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Whitedragon »

There are many complications that come with prostitution and pornography. Sometimes people get financially and psychologically into trouble; with prostitution people also are exposed to diseases. Is pornography art, maybe it is, but then if I mix blood into mortar and create a work of art does that art justify the deaths that made it so ? Porn and prostitution is a threat to society.

The other concern is that porn and prostitution is overly express in the way it generates money. There are a few things in society which is like this, but I think none of them hold a candle to porn and prostitution. Therefore these have the ability to affect the economy in negative ways and, I think, can even be used in financial and political power struggles. Therefore it’s very detrimental to use sex as a means of making money; it is like making money off the hair you grow. Most people have the ability to grow hair, and if it were a priced commodity those who had “good hair” could make money naturally without having to spend time and effort on attaining a skill. Yet sex is much more express and there in is where the danger lies. Lastly porn and prostitution has the potential to be very destructive; thus a lot of money is made from something which is often harmful and thus useless. Those who make money without the need for building a skill often aid to harming the world rather than producing something useful. Thus they obtain money or in other words the ability to move the resources of the planet, (our resources), to their hearts desire and all we get from it is to revel for a bit.

-- Updated August 31st, 2015, 11:45 am to add the following --

There are many complications that come with prostitution and pornography. Sometimes people get financially and psychologically into trouble; with prostitution people also are exposed to diseases. Is pornography art, maybe it is, but then if I mix blood into mortar and create a work of art does that art justify the deaths that made it so ? Porn and prostitution is a threat to society.

The other concern is that porn and prostitution is overly express in the way it generates money. There are a few things in society which is like this, but I think none of them hold a candle to porn and prostitution. Therefore these have the ability to affect the economy in negative ways and, I think, can even be used in financial and political power struggles. Therefore it’s very detrimental to use sex as a means of making money; it is like making money off the hair you grow. Most people have the ability to grow hair, and if it were a priced commodity those who had “good hair” could make money naturally without having to spend time and effort on attaining a skill. Yet sex is much more express and there in is where the danger lies. Lastly porn and prostitution has the potential to be very destructive; thus a lot of money is made from something which is often harmful and thus useless. Those who make money without the need for building a skill often aid to harming the world rather than producing something useful. Thus they obtain money or in other words the ability to move the resources of the planet, (our resources), to their hearts desire and all we get from it is to revel for a bit.
We are a frozen spirit; our thoughts a cloud of droplets; different oceans and ages brood inside – where spirit sublimates. To some our words, an acid rain, to some it is too pure, to some infectious, to some a cure.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7914
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by LuckyR »

Whitedragon wrote:There are many complications that come with prostitution and pornography. Sometimes people get financially and psychologically into trouble; with prostitution people also are exposed to diseases. Is pornography art, maybe it is, but then if I mix blood into mortar and create a work of art does that art justify the deaths that made it so ? Porn and prostitution is a threat to society.

The other concern is that porn and prostitution is overly express in the way it generates money. There are a few things in society which is like this, but I think none of them hold a candle to porn and prostitution. Therefore these have the ability to affect the economy in negative ways and, I think, can even be used in financial and political power struggles. Therefore it’s very detrimental to use sex as a means of making money; it is like making money off the hair you grow. Most people have the ability to grow hair, and if it were a priced commodity those who had “good hair” could make money naturally without having to spend time and effort on attaining a skill. Yet sex is much more express and there in is where the danger lies. Lastly porn and prostitution has the potential to be very destructive; thus a lot of money is made from something which is often harmful and thus useless. Those who make money without the need for building a skill often aid to harming the world rather than producing something useful. Thus they obtain money or in other words the ability to move the resources of the planet, (our resources), to their hearts desire and all we get from it is to revel for a bit.
Serioiusly? What are your thoughts on video games? How about paintball? Cigarettes? Alcohol? Dungeons and Dragons?

If someone, somewhere can "get into... trouble" doing something, then it is inherantly "a threat to society"? I am not seeing a huge benefit to society in having Big Brother enforce their Nannystate rules governing the behavioral interactions between consenting adults.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Lagayscienza
Posts: 1792
Joined: February 8th, 2015, 3:27 am
Favorite Philosopher: Hume Nietzsche
Location: Antipodes

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Lagayscienza »

If "Porn and prostitution is [sic] a threat to society" then how is it they have always been with us and yet society has survived?

I can't see that erotica and prostitution, as long as only consenting adults are involved, is anyone else's business.

You say that they are harmful because they are just unproductive and therefore useless activities. However, if this is going to be the criterion for allowing and disallowing certain activities then perhaps we should also ban art, music, dancing, literature... There are heaps of things that humans do that that may not "produce something useful" but which we value for other non-utilitarian reasons.

Trying to legislatively control peoples sex lives is the thin edge of the wedge. Leave consenting adults alone to pursue activities they enjoy as long as they do not harm others. It's no one else's business.
La Gaya Scienza
User avatar
Whitedragon
Posts: 1100
Joined: November 14th, 2012, 12:12 pm

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Whitedragon »

LuckyR said: “Serioiusly? What are your thoughts on video games? How about paintball? Cigarettes? Alcohol? Dungeons and Dragons?

If someone, somewhere can "get into... trouble" doing something, then it is inherantly "a threat to society"? I am not seeing a huge benefit to society in having Big Brother enforce their Nannystate rules governing the behavioral interactions between consenting adults.”

No. I think the concept of consenting adults is not the issue here, which was also not my main emphasis in my previous post.
We are a frozen spirit; our thoughts a cloud of droplets; different oceans and ages brood inside – where spirit sublimates. To some our words, an acid rain, to some it is too pure, to some infectious, to some a cure.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13783
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Belinda »

It's not because someone somewhere can get into trouble, it's because kids are learning from porn that sexual partners are commodities. Learning this attitude is very much worse than "getting into trouble".

The attitude that a girl is not an empowered person reflects a wider attitude in modern capitalist societies that people are no more than labourers and consumers.

The serious objection to porn is not that it is sexually explicit. The objection is it's okay that others be regarded as commodities .
Socialist
User avatar
Lagayscienza
Posts: 1792
Joined: February 8th, 2015, 3:27 am
Favorite Philosopher: Hume Nietzsche
Location: Antipodes

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Lagayscienza »

Belinda, I agree with what you say about depicting people as sexual commodities and I think there is a danger of kids absorbing this idea if exposed to porn and for that reason it should be restricted to adults. I have no problem with non-violent erotica for adults providing the performers are willing adults and in no way coerced.
La Gaya Scienza
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13783
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Belinda »

Lagaya, I am the same.
Socialist
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7914
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by LuckyR »

I don't disagree that there are potential risks from pornography in particular. Thus why I compared it in my post to violence in media, alcohol and tobacco, all of which also have potential risks. It is customary NOT to criminalize things that have a mix of potential benefit and risk. They can be restricted, like all of the above but it would be unusual to make them illegal.

Perhaps I am reading more into folks' wording than they mean. For example, when "threat to society" is the phrase, I subconsciously add: "therefore I am against it and it should be illegal", since many say that. Perhaps posters mean: "thus and so is a threat to society... therefore I am against it and won't make use of it personally, but if others want to, that's OK, I hope they watch out for the risks". I agree with that.
"As usual... it depends."
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13783
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Belinda »

LuckyR wrote:
I don't disagree that there are potential risks from pornography in particular. Thus why I compared it in my post to violence in media, alcohol and tobacco, all of which also have potential risks. It is customary NOT to criminalize things that have a mix of potential benefit and risk. They can be restricted, like all of the above but it would be unusual to make them illegal.
Adapting a social criticism to a change on the law is difficult. Persuading people not to smoke and legislating against it as much as possible was easy compared with possible legislation against porn. The former was about physical health only. Stopping porn is about social, psychological, and cultural health. Porn qua porn implies that people are nothing but commodities . Erotica simply implies "Look how exciting to see and hear people doing sex in interesting ways."

Porn, which is a commercial adaptation of erotica's commercial potential, shows people doing sex as if they were nothing but beautiful and athletic sex stars. But many people believe that sex is really like this__________ that if you are not a beautiful and athletic sex star there is something wrong with the essential free person that you are.

True, many professions and even trades demand that the people act certain roles as if they are at heart what they seem to be . However few people believe that the electrician behaves as an electrician and not as a full human being when he stops work for the day. Porn implies the lie that people are actually like that all the time, and not just for the duration of the sex acts or the video performance.

It would be good if schools could arm kids against porn's insidious attack on their personal freedom . I don't know how teachers can do it bearing in mind that sex is so much more fascinating than most other human activities, activities that real people do such as mending the electrics. It's difficult for me, an educated, old, and experienced adult to explain porn's insidious lies to other adults online. How can kids be protected other than by banning porn, by law?
Socialist
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7914
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by LuckyR »

Belinda wrote:LuckyR wrote:
I don't disagree that there are potential risks from pornography in particular. Thus why I compared it in my post to violence in media, alcohol and tobacco, all of which also have potential risks. It is customary NOT to criminalize things that have a mix of potential benefit and risk. They can be restricted, like all of the above but it would be unusual to make them illegal.
Adapting a social criticism to a change on the law is difficult. Persuading people not to smoke and legislating against it as much as possible was easy compared with possible legislation against porn. The former was about physical health only. Stopping porn is about social, psychological, and cultural health. Porn qua porn implies that people are nothing but commodities . Erotica simply implies "Look how exciting to see and hear people doing sex in interesting ways."

Porn, which is a commercial adaptation of erotica's commercial potential, shows people doing sex as if they were nothing but beautiful and athletic sex stars. But many people believe that sex is really like this__________ that if you are not a beautiful and athletic sex star there is something wrong with the essential free person that you are.

True, many professions and even trades demand that the people act certain roles as if they are at heart what they seem to be . However few people believe that the electrician behaves as an electrician and not as a full human being when he stops work for the day. Porn implies the lie that people are actually like that all the time, and not just for the duration of the sex acts or the video performance.

It would be good if schools could arm kids against porn's insidious attack on their personal freedom . I don't know how teachers can do it bearing in mind that sex is so much more fascinating than most other human activities, activities that real people do such as mending the electrics. It's difficult for me, an educated, old, and experienced adult to explain porn's insidious lies to other adults online. How can kids be protected other than by banning porn, by law?
Don't sell yourself short, IMO you are making a very insightful and clear appeal for your argument in this format.

The solution to the problem you raise seems to be up ahead, just around the corner. If you look where porn has been and where it is now, it seems there is a likely future that looks brighter than today.

Porn used to be uncommon, difficult to acquire anonymously, associated with the most scurrilous segment of society and though enticing to minors, was much less available to them, likely driving a lot of that same enticement.

Currently porn is ubiquitous, not all that enticing and can be associated with elements of mainstream society. I am sure that minors are drawn to it. but likely there is no drive from it's being "forbidden".

If this trend continues it is likely to become yet another media option in the future and despite the ridiculous American (I know you you are in the UK) prudishness, will likely become a topic that many will feel comfortable discussing with their kids, thus separating the presentation from the reality in children's eyes, not dissimilar to your electrician comment. At that point the concern you bring up will dissolve not unlike the old "video games cause mass shootings" concern from 10 years ago.

Clearly moving backwards to a prohibition stance would do for porn and minors what Prohibition did for beer drinkers, that is turn them into whiskey/gin drinkers.
"As usual... it depends."
Supine
Posts: 1017
Joined: November 27th, 2012, 2:11 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Supine »

Belinda wrote: Porn, which is a commercial adaptation of erotica's commercial potential, shows people doing sex as if they were nothing but beautiful and athletic sex stars. But many people believe that sex is really like this__________ that if you are not a beautiful and athletic sex star there is something wrong with the essential free person that you are.
The blue bold highlight mine. So, what is wrong with people believing that sexual activity is x, y, z in alignment with pornographic depiction?

If you were to look at the traditional Catholic concept of how sexual intercourse should be--which includes a militant equality between the man and woman--then almost all sex most people engage is pornographic.

Gay porn for instance just gives people into gay sexual fantasies what they want to indulge in as customers.

There's so many different genres of porn too. Genres of female dominatrix sodomizing men etc.

It would be good if schools could arm kids against porn's insidious attack on their personal freedom . I don't know how teachers can do it bearing in mind that sex is so much more fascinating than most other human activities, activities that real people do such as mending the electrics. It's difficult for me, an educated, old, and experienced adult to explain porn's insidious lies to other adults online. How can kids be protected other than by banning porn, by law?
You want to ban homosexual people from watching gay porn? Do you want to ban the debauched gay parades with lesbians walking naked submissive lesbians down public streets bare naked on leashes?

I think people will buy what they want even if it is consumed in discretion and purchased in underground economies.

I do think porn is vice. Probably. But there are a lot of vices in the world. I'm not sure banning porn is the answer. Some porn lovers might even call it art. Theatrical art.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13783
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Belinda »

Supine wrote:
So, what is wrong with people believing that sexual activity is x, y, z in alignment with pornographic depiction?

If you were to look at the traditional Catholic concept of how sexual intercourse should be--which includes a militant equality between the man and woman--then almost all sex most people engage is pornographic.

Gay porn for instance just gives people into gay sexual fantasies what they want to indulge in as customers.

There's so many different genres of porn too. Genres of female dominatrix sodomizing men etc.
I fear that you have not understood my previous posts.

Certainly women power should equal men power in sexual encounters as in all other relations where power is a factor.

I disapprove of sodomy because rectums can be badly wounded and disabled by insertion of large foreign bodies.
Socialist
Supine
Posts: 1017
Joined: November 27th, 2012, 2:11 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Supine »

Belinda wrote:Supine wrote:
So, what is wrong with people believing that sexual activity is x, y, z in alignment with pornographic depiction?

If you were to look at the traditional Catholic concept of how sexual intercourse should be--which includes a militant equality between the man and woman--then almost all sex most people engage is pornographic.

Gay porn for instance just gives people into gay sexual fantasies what they want to indulge in as customers.

There's so many different genres of porn too. Genres of female dominatrix sodomizing men etc.
I fear that you have not understood my previous posts.

Certainly women power should equal men power in sexual encounters as in all other relations where power is a factor.

I disapprove of sodomy because rectums can be badly wounded and disabled by insertion of large foreign bodies.
I'm surprised by your last paragraph, so, maybe I misunderstood your posts.

I'm not sure I've fully concluded that the erotic roles of the dominate and submissive interacting are wrong, bad, not ideal or however one would phrase it. Traditional Christian teaching views it as not ideal and a consequence of Original Sin. But I admit I've not been fully persuaded by that Christian view point perhaps due to my own flaws which may color my perception.

Pornography steps into the realm of voyeurism though. And so it's dynamics are more than simply what a couple does in the privacy of their own quarters--be they assuming equal sexual roles or unequal roles.

I don't know that anything qualifies as art. That would really depend on the definition of art. But if one quality of art is to improve us either intellectually, spiritually, or in virtue then pornography would seem to do the reverse of that. Porn appealing to what we term base instincts. Porn placing the emphasis and value of the human character only on a sexual criteria and sexual quality and one not promoting pregnancy and family as a result or goal of sexual activity.

So, I guess if I have a criticism of porn that would be it or one of them.

Although, I won't say that viewing porn can't teach a person one or two or more things specifically related to sexual acts and certain sexual erotics.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13783
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Belinda »

Supine wrote:
Although, I won't say that viewing porn can't teach a person one or two or more things specifically related to sexual acts and certain sexual erotics.
Certainly! However the differential definition of pornography which I have suggested includes mainly that while pornography is erotica, all erotica is not pornography. My intention is that it's good to qualify content as pornographic if it lies about the human condition, often for commercial gain. Erotica is often true of the human condition.

The conditions for separating pornography from erotica then are like the conditions for separating the good from the bad in any other literary genre or artistic idiom. The need to evaluate erotica in this way is more urgent than most lit crit because of the natural fascination with erotica among children.
Socialist
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of the Arts and Philosophy in the Arts”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021