Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Use this forum to have philosophical discussions about aesthetics and art. What is art? What is beauty? What makes art good? You can also use this forum to discuss philosophy in the arts, namely to discuss the philosophical points in any particular movie, TV show, book or story.
Supine
Posts: 1017
Joined: November 27th, 2012, 2:11 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Supine »

Belinda wrote:Supine wrote:
Although, I won't say that viewing porn can't teach a person one or two or more things specifically related to sexual acts and certain sexual erotics.
Certainly! However the differential definition of pornography which I have suggested includes mainly that while pornography is erotica, all erotica is not pornography. My intention is that it's good to qualify content as pornographic if it lies about the human condition, often for commercial gain. Erotica is often true of the human condition.

The conditions for separating pornography from erotica then are like the conditions for separating the good from the bad in any other literary genre or artistic idiom. The need to evaluate erotica in this way is more urgent than most lit crit because of the natural fascination with erotica among children.
The US Supreme Court would agree with you that not all art pertaining to nudity is pornographic. If that's what you mean by erotica that is not pornographic. I'm not sure the US Supreme Court Justices would use the term "erotica" for what they regard as non-pornographic nudity depicted or captured in "art."

Regardless I can accept your term of "lie" about pornography if by what we mean to "lie" to its audience or viewer is "deception."

But then... maybe even the concept of "deception" opens up a can of worms, I don't know. Can't games of flirtation, persuasion, "putting on one's best" or projected image between two people utilize "deception"? I think the Brazilian's have some phrase about a man courting a woman and how the woman prefers the man project a fantasy rather than reality to her--as this makes the romantic and sensual life more "fun" or entertaining. I can't remember the exact phrase though.

I do recall a personal experience with a very attractive woman. Above average in looks. And a former stripper. She actually pursued me even though I tried to dissuade or not encourage her. And yet I yielded. And I came to like her a lot. So, one night she called me over. The long story short is I could have had sex with her that night, and she attempted to get intimate with me. But because I liked her I wanted her to have fuller knowledge of me and not simply the image she had of me produced in her mind. I wanted to give her a "choice" with that knowledge. So, I told her I was a drug addict. You could see the disappointment fall over her face. And I did not get any sex that night. LOL. My visit was in fact cut short.

But who was she attracted to all a long? Me? Or some image she had produced of me in her head? If I kept my personal info to myself all the while knowing she thought the opposite of me... would that be deception and if deception is that deception bad?

This digresses some.

But the lie or deception inherent in pornography is something many of us like. We don't like the truth or full truth or we like being deceived--at least if we are active participants in creating that deception in our own minds.
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Hereandnow »

the better question is, is anything NOT art. Take the pragmatic point of view: If I look at X as art, that is, I take X up as something in the art world, I give X a special context that is away from sex as, well, sex. ANYTHING is art if one makes this move. If I take a pornographic scene and blackmail a person with it, it takes on a legal and moral aspect it never had. If I put it in an exhibition hall it's art. See Robert Mapplethorpe's "obscene" sadomasochistic exhibition. (I won't include a link because it's kind of weird. But you can Google him easily). Again, all things art art if they are taken into the context of being so. That what it means to be art, which is an evolving concept as we evolve and make/discover new meanings.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13784
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Belinda »

Here and Now, if we take 'art' to mean a praiseworthy work of art, and not simply any old symbolic form, we need to take into account the maker's intention. There is no point in praising a found object or an implement except with regard to its human application. Other animals and inanimate stuff don't praise.

Supine wrote:

But the lie or deception inherent in pornography is something many of us like. We don't like the truth or full truth or we like being deceived--at least if we are active participants in creating that deception in our own minds.
If we read the whole of Supine's anecdote from which the above is an extract, we can see that Supine's intention was to reveal truth to the best of his ability. If what he did were embodied in some form that had a presence of its own, then that would be a work of art. Truth is the criterion for art and not-art, pornographic erotica and non-pornographic erotica.
Socialist
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Hereandnow »

Belinda: if we take 'art' to mean a praiseworthy work of art, and not simply any old symbolic form, we need to take into account the maker's intention. There is no point in praising a found object or an implement except with regard to its human application.
Praiseworthiness and artist's intentions. I wonder if 'praiseworthiness' is another word for 'good' given that we praise exclusively what is good and what is good is exclusively praiseworthy. This seems to me an tautology. So you want to say good art is about good artists, and i would agree. It's hard to even imagine a bad artist doing good art unless in this case it is good art, thereby making the bad artist a good artist in this case. ''

But meaning plays out differently, doesn't it? I mean Hemingway's Old Man and the Sea has been interpreted to death, most of which bears no resemblance at all to what Hemingway intended. Literary critics don't care, saying the proof is in the pudding, not int he artist's intentions.

-- Updated December 2nd, 2015, 1:52 pm to add the following --
Supine: But who was she attracted to all a long? Me? Or some image she had produced of me in her head?
This kind of thing can drive one a little mad. The spoken words are part of an intersubjective consensus, complex, filled with all the communicative nuances. These are freighted out with the language through idiomatic usage, body language, suggestive metaphor and irony, and so forth. All public personalities are, if you will, already out there and we should have a lot of respect for the interpersonal games we play which can be so subtle. But the hidden self, the individual experience of the world, that rich textured qualia of the conscious mind as it makes a fabric of experienced reality---that is never out there. One can never really know the, if you will, transcendental Other self sitting across the table. This body of textured communication is all we can ever come to know. It gets interesting with questions like, this public self, is it really at all different from the inner? Is there a private self? After all, the language in my interior stream of consciousness runs the same as the public stream.

This all goes the issue of whether there are things language cannot do to present a self intersubjectively.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13784
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Belinda »

Here and Now wrote:
Praiseworthiness and artist's intentions. I wonder if 'praiseworthiness' is another word for 'good' given that we praise exclusively what is good and what is good is exclusively praiseworthy. This seems to me an tautology. So you want to say good art is about good artists, and i would agree. It's hard to even imagine a bad artist doing good art unless in this case it is good art, thereby making the bad artist a good artist in this case. ''

But meaning plays out differently, doesn't it? I mean Hemingway's Old Man and the Sea has been interpreted to death, most of which bears no resemblance at all to what Hemingway intended. Literary critics don't care, saying the proof is in the pudding, not int he artist's intentions.
Yes, to your first paragraph.

I did not know that literary critics said "the proof is in the pudding, not in the artist's intentions." I prefer to think that man is on a quest for the good, and art is one way to pursue that quest. The quest for the good is not to be interpreted as aligning the good with some religious belief about god. The good and the quest for it are the same. However the artist has a special skill in interpreting matters on behalf of other people. If some alleged artist lacks the will to interpret the good but is a facile decorator like Jack Vetriano, or those pretty watercolourists four of whose paintings I inherited from my mother, then he is not the sort of 'artist' we are talking about, is he?

Vetriano , and late Victorian watercolourists aren't going to lead anybody into sexual trouble, but porn can and does.
Socialist
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7914
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by LuckyR »

Supine brings up a very important point on this topic, namely that sexuality and thus pornography's role, is all in the head, not the genitals. Porn's purpose is to take someone to a particular state of mind. Thus why there are so many different categories, corresponding with different folks' different turn ons. Much has been made of the intent of the producer and the plight of the actors, but lets face it, a drawing can be porn, actors are not required. I am sure that a computer program could be written that can produce adequate porn, with no intent whatsoever. Ultimately it isn't about the product or the production, it is about the consumer. This is proven by the fact that the changing role of porn over the years has not been because of a difference in the intent of the producers but in the attitude change in the consumers (and observers, ie society at large).
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Hereandnow »

LuckyR: This is proven by the fact that the changing role of porn over the years has not been because of a difference in the intent of the producers but in the attitude change in the consumers (and observers, ie society at large).
And what, i wonder, will happen when in the future all or most of our sense of taboo is removed from our collective sexual mentality. I wonder, if it is, as you say, in the mind of the, errrrr, consumer, can liberation from sexual fear, secrecy and illicitness, which seems to be the direction of our emerging society lead to a "normalized" regard for sex? is such a settled state even possible? Desirable? (What about all those lovely fetishes?)

-- Updated December 3rd, 2015, 8:49 pm to add the following --
Belinda: I did not know that literary critics said "the proof is in the pudding, not in the artist's intentions." I prefer to think that man is on a quest for the good, and art is one way to pursue that quest. The quest for the good is not to be interpreted as aligning the good with some religious belief about god. The good and the quest for it are the same. However the artist has a special skill in interpreting matters on behalf of other people. If some alleged artist lacks the will to interpret the good but is a facile decorator like Jack Vetriano, or those pretty watercolourists four of whose paintings I inherited from my mother, then he is not the sort of 'artist' we are talking about, is he?

Vetriano , and late Victorian watercolourists aren't going to lead anybody into sexual trouble, but porn can and does.
i think the question is, what do you do if you have a text lends itself to divergent interpretations? Was Gatsby defensible in his illegal affairs, driven as he was by something beautiful, even profound (Fitzgerald does use the biblical Jacob's Latter and Plato's forms to make his point)? Does Fitzgerald's taking sides on this really matter much once we've pored through the text and produced a reasonable, evidence-based thesis? Author's intention can count, but it is not a necessary condition for a legitimate interpretation.

Porn can lead to trouble. Interesting: Does this make it more or less for art?

I am surprised to hear you say you think art is a pursuit of the good. "The Good" is not a far cry from God.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7914
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by LuckyR »

Hereandnow wrote:
LuckyR: This is proven by the fact that the changing role of porn over the years has not been because of a difference in the intent of the producers but in the attitude change in the consumers (and observers, ie society at large).
And what, i wonder, will happen when in the future all or most of our sense of taboo is removed from our collective sexual mentality. I wonder, if it is, as you say, in the mind of the, errrrr, consumer, can liberation from sexual fear, secrecy and illicitness, which seems to be the direction of our emerging society lead to a "normalized" regard for sex? is such a settled state even possible? Desirable? (What about all those lovely fetishes?)
Yes it will be a mixed bad, though it would not suprise me if we never get there (especially in the US, where tradition is king) fully. Opportunities for banishing negatives and opening up some positives (though those are actually avoidance of negatives) though you are right to not underestimate the value of the forbiddenness of forbidden fruit.
"As usual... it depends."
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13784
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Belinda »

Here and Now wrote:
I am surprised to hear you say you think art is a pursuit of the good. "The Good" is not a far cry from God.
I know it is. I am using 'art' as a mark of respect. I think it's a useful activity to distinguish between what is good and what is bad, in any human quest including science, politics, morals, religions, doing the laundry, washing the dog, anything.

I know that good intentions are not always fulfilled . For instance with their best of intentions whatever anybody does to try to stop Daesh and the civil war in Syria nobody can predict what is the best means to accomplish the good result. The good intention is paramount, as without it knowledge lacks the application of judgement. I am against religions insofar as they lack the humility to say "nobody knows".
Socialist
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Hereandnow »

Belinda: I am against religions insofar as they lack the humility to say "nobody knows".
I like the end of Camus' Stranger on that.

As for me, I don't like religions because they're stark raving mad. On the other hand, I am by no means a nihilist.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13784
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Belinda »

Hereandnow wrote:
Belinda: I am against religions insofar as they lack the humility to say "nobody knows".
I like the end of Camus' Stranger on that.

As for me, I don't like religions because they're stark raving mad. On the other hand, I am by no means a nihilist.

I don't know Camus' Stranger. Would you tell me please?
Socialist
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Hereandnow »

Belinda:
I don't know Camus' Stranger. Would you tell me please?
As i recall (I used to teach this novel) Meursault is in jail waiting to be guillotined and the priest walks in trying to encourage acceptance of Jesus, god's grace, remission of sins and so forth. The affair turns nasty and Meursault is outraged by the priest's confidence in something he knows absolutely nothing about. For me, this is one of the truly galling things about dogmatic belief: The ridiculous, infuriating confidence in something that should be a struggle. People should be in awe. Facile medieval dogma belies the human condition.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13784
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Belinda »

Gosh! Mersault was some authentic existentialist. I'd have recanted so not to be guillotined. I'd say mass or whatever in return for getting shelter for refugees.

I bet the Free French Maquis during the war pretended to obey the Nazi forces of occupation when it was expedient to do so.
Socialist
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Hereandnow »

Belinda:
Gosh! Mersault was some authentic existentialist. I'd have recanted so not to be guillotined. I'd say mass or whatever in return for getting shelter for refugees.

I bet the Free French Maquis during the war pretended to obey the Nazi forces of occupation when it was expedient to do so.
Alas, it had already been made clear that he had no feelings for anyone, especially is deceased mother. He was convicted of a lack of filial devotion.
Good thing he didn't care, which was pretty much Camus' point. Interesting point about doing what was expedient. Why didn't he? It was because he had no emotional investment in the world and therefore
no guilt or regret. A true absurd hero pushing the Sisyphean rock up the mountain, smiling.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13784
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Belinda »

Here and Now wrote about Camus' Mersault character:
Interesting point about doing what was expedient. Why didn't he? It was because he had no emotional investment in the world and therefore
no guilt or regret. A true absurd hero pushing the Sisyphean rock up the mountain, smiling.
"no emotional investment in the world".If one chooses life it follows that you push the rock in the perhaps absurd faith that you can build a cairn at the top, thus one has an investment in the world. Does Mersault consider that other people are fictions of his own imagination? This is what religious dictators do and thereby mentally imprisons the individuals over whom he rules, usually by means of terror police.
Socialist
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of the Arts and Philosophy in the Arts”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021