Do we have more than one material sense?
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: January 11th, 2018, 6:34 pm
Do we have more than one material sense?
All of these can be logically said to really just be one sense, touch, being used by different parts of the body.
Taste could be defined as your tongues reaction to touch.
Smell could be defined as your brains response to certain types of air molecules touching your olfactory epithelium.
Hearing could be defined as air vibrating into, and touching, the ear drum.
Sight as different wavelengths within the electromagnetic spectrum touching the optical nerve.
Is there fundamentally only one physical way to obtain information, broken down and categorized to the manner in which our bodies just happen to manifest, or are each of our five senses unique and completely unrelated characteristics that are resulted from particular environmental requirements?
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: January 11th, 2018, 6:34 pm
Re: Do we have more than one material sense?
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Do we have more than one material sense?
- Frost
- Posts: 511
- Joined: January 20th, 2018, 2:44 pm
Re: Do we have more than one material sense?
I think you are altering the word "touch," since taste and smell is a chemical reaction with molecules binding with receptors rather than generating a mechanical stretch. Indeed, when an object touches your skin, what you are feeling is a combination of the electromagnetic force of the repelling electrons in the object and your skin rather than a binding of a molecule to a receptor site. In fact, smell may even be more than merely chemical, but may include detection of the quantum resonance of molecules, which is not a chemical property.StayCurious wrote: ↑March 3rd, 2018, 11:56 pm By material sense, I refer to our ability to consume information about the world, which many conclude to be the famous 5: touch, taste, smell, hearing, and sight.
All of these can be logically said to really just be one sense, touch, being used by different parts of the body.
Taste could be defined as your tongues reaction to touch.
Smell could be defined as your brains response to certain types of air molecules touching your olfactory epithelium.
Hearing could be defined as air vibrating into, and touching, the ear drum.
Sight as different wavelengths within the electromagnetic spectrum touching the optical nerve.
Is there fundamentally only one physical way to obtain information, broken down and categorized to the manner in which our bodies just happen to manifest, or are each of our five senses unique and completely unrelated characteristics that are resulted from particular environmental requirements?
At the cellular level, there are mechanisms that detect mechanical stretch, which is rather different than the absorption of photons that occurs in the retina, which itself is neither mechanical nor chemical.
There is also a tremendous amount of internal perception, some of which detects mechanical stimulation and a lot that detects the "internal chemical milieu" which is a felt sensation of the homeostatic state of the organism.
Additionally, parapsychology research published in mainstream peer-reviewed scientific journals indicates that there are even more radically different forms of perception, commonly referred to as psychic. Please see:
Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 407-425.
Radin, D., Michel, L., Galdamex, K., Wendland, P., Rickenbach, R., & Delorme, A. (2012). "Consciousness and the double-slit interference pattern: Six experiments." Physics Essays, 25(2), 157-171.
Radin, D., Michel, L., Johnston, J., & Delorme, A. (2013) "Psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern." Physic Essays, 26(4), 553-566.
Radin, D., Michel, L., & Delorme, A. (2016) "Psychophysical modulation of fringe visibility in a distant double-slit optical system." Physics Essays, 29(1), 14-22.
- Atreyu
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: June 17th, 2014, 3:11 am
- Favorite Philosopher: P.D. Ouspensky
- Location: Orlando, FL
Re: Do we have more than one material sense?
-
- Posts: 1780
- Joined: January 27th, 2012, 9:32 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Hermese Trismegistus
Re: Do we have more than one material sense?
- Windrammer
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 5
- Joined: April 14th, 2018, 11:31 pm
Re: Do we have more than one material sense?
If it's necessarily "material" then literally anything would have to be dismissed as "touch" because that's what follows from "material". A sensation is an interaction between the world and the senses, and a material interaction is one of stuff touching. The conclusion comes from the chosen definition rather than metaphysical principle. I'd pose the question to you of whether you could even imagine a hypothetical "material" sense that doesn't involve something that could be dismissed as touch.StayCurious wrote: ↑March 3rd, 2018, 11:56 pm By material sense, I refer to our ability to consume information about the world, which many conclude to be the famous 5: touch, taste, smell, hearing, and sight.
All of these can be logically said to really just be one sense, touch, being used by different parts of the body.
Taste could be defined as your tongues reaction to touch.
Smell could be defined as your brains response to certain types of air molecules touching your olfactory epithelium.
Hearing could be defined as air vibrating into, and touching, the ear drum.
Sight as different wavelengths within the electromagnetic spectrum touching the optical nerve.
Is there fundamentally only one physical way to obtain information, broken down and categorized to the manner in which our bodies just happen to manifest, or are each of our five senses unique and completely unrelated characteristics that are resulted from particular environmental requirements?
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023