In this analogy (lecture?), is this arrogant mistake-prone driver me, or YOU? If it is me, then I am sure you can easily point out my mistake(s); the flaws in my reasoning, ...true? ...or can you???Eduk wrote:When I am driving I often see a driver make a small driving mistake. It is often the case that such small mistakes are followed by other small mistakes. It's not a one hundred percent rule of course but if I do see a small mistake I drive in a way which allows for follow up mistakes.
I suspect the driver who makes many small mistakes almost certainly doesn't realise. They probably think they are above average.
And you too my friend.Eduk wrote:I am very hopeful you will realise that you can't really do logic and will adjust your behaviour to reflect this. Perhaps, to take my driving analogy, drive a little slower?
Saying I "can't do logic" and proving it are two different matters. I really look forward to you pointing out the logical flaws in my argument. Hopefully you will realize that you are just full of hot air and will adjust your behavior and stop making baseless accusations that you can't possibly back up.
Maybe you should heed your own condescending advice?
To put it simply, instead of logically disputing my claim/explanation, you arrogantly deny (without reason!) my explanation in favor of 'ignorance'; of "unknown" explanations.Eduk wrote:I invite you to investigate your claim that I am commiting the appeal to ignorance logical fallacy. Perhaps you can explain what this means and provide some clear examples then show how this applies to my claim.
Again, if my logic is flawed, then please point it out. Otherwise save the condescending lectures for yourself.