Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Discuss any topics related to metaphysics (the philosophical study of the principles of reality) or epistemology (the philosophical study of knowledge) in this forum.
Post Reply
Tamminen
Posts: 1347
Joined: April 19th, 2016, 2:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Tamminen »

Steve3007 wrote: September 23rd, 2018, 6:28 am "Matter is one of the concepts that is useful to me for achieving my goals. Others are available."
Of course matter is a useful concept, and essential for thinking of any being whatsoever, including the being of consciousness.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Steve3007 »

Tamminen wrote:It always comes to this, I am not as stupid as you think I am.
I don't think you're stupid. You referred to "many conversations" but were not more specific. This topic alone is 64 pages long. I looked back a bit at your conversation with Fooloso4 and others and tried as best I could to see if I could work out your position in a nutshell. Clearly I failed.

If you could summarize that position here, or point to a small number of your previous posts that summarize it, that would be useful.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Steve3007 »

Of course matter is a useful concept, and essential for thinking of any being whatsoever, including the being of consciousness.
Do you agree with all of the post from which this quote was taken or just that part?
Tamminen
Posts: 1347
Joined: April 19th, 2016, 2:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Tamminen »

Steve3007 wrote: September 23rd, 2018, 7:54 am If you could summarize that position here, or point to a small number of your previous posts that summarize it, that would be useful.
How about the post on the previous page starting with "The problem with materialism..."?
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Steve3007 »

Tamminen wrote:How about the post on the previous page starting with "The problem with materialism..."?
OK. I'll tackle that one. I looked at it previously but didn't think it represented the core of what you were saying. I didn't think what you were originally talking about was Materialism. That post looked like the end point of a conversation. I wanted to find the start.
The problem with materialism is that it makes unjustified assumptions and commitments. We cannot eliminate the being of the subject from the knowing of the world, but because we see matter everywhere, we draw the false conclusion that matter is everything there is, or at least everything can be reduced to matter, and that the being of matter does not depend on the being of the subject. This is an epistemic leap that has no rational justification.
I don't think I agree that that is problem with Materialism. I think it's this:

viewtopic.php?p=320192#p320192
Tamminen
Posts: 1347
Joined: April 19th, 2016, 2:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Tamminen »

Steve3007 wrote: September 23rd, 2018, 7:56 am
Of course matter is a useful concept, and essential for thinking of any being whatsoever, including the being of consciousness.
Do you agree with all of the post from which this quote was taken or just that part?
There are surely many definitions of materialism, but the main point of our discussion is whether the being of the world is independent of the being of the subjective perspective to the world. If consciousness is an emergent property of matter or if the mind is identical with the brain does not change this basic ontological question.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Steve3007 »

I personally think that if there are indeed many different definitions of Materialism then we need to define which of those definitions we're using before trying to decide whether or not we agree with it.
Tamminen
Posts: 1347
Joined: April 19th, 2016, 2:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Tamminen »

Steve3007 wrote: September 23rd, 2018, 8:22 am I personally think that if there are indeed many different definitions of Materialism then we need to define which of those definitions we're using before trying to decide whether or not we agree with it.
Yes, I agree, but in this case I think all the versions of materialism I know of make the unjustified assumption that there is matter in itself, independent of the being of subjectivity, which to me is pure transcendence without immanence, and I cannot consistently conceive of something like that. It has been the question of the universe without subjects in many of our discussions, the dividing line between materialism and the sort of idealism or subjectivism that I represent.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Steve3007 »

Tamminen wrote:The problem with materialism is that it makes unjustified assumptions and commitments. We cannot eliminate the being of the subject from the knowing of the world, but because we see matter everywhere, we draw the false conclusion that matter is everything there is, or at least everything can be reduced to matter, and that the being of matter does not depend on the being of the subject. This is an epistemic leap that has no rational justification.
I think the reason that the proposition "there is nothing but matter" cannot be justified is that the concept of matter is just one of the available concepts that we might find useful for describing and predicting our observations. Others are available. And we have no idea what others may become available in the future.
What materialism tries to say is that our own being can be explained by of the being of our objects, in the sense of noumena, which are independent of our knowledge of them, in the Kantian sense.
I think the proposition that objects exist independent of our direct observations of them can be useful if the proposed existence of those objects describes/predicts indirect observations.
Here we have two intuitions in conflict: the intuition of materialism that matter is everything, and the intuition that the being of the subject cannot be eliminated.
I try not to set too much store by intuition.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Steve3007 »

Tamminen wrote:Yes, I agree, but in this case I think all the versions of materialism I know of make the unjustified assumption that there is matter in itself, independent of the being of subjectivity, which to me is pure transcendence without immanence, and I cannot consistently conceive of something like that. It has been the question of the universe without subjects in many of our discussions, the dividing line between materialism and the sort of idealism or subjectivism that I represent.
I personally think that the only really meaningful question is whether this worldview of yours actually makes you behave any differently from a person who subscribes to a version of Materialism. What difference does it make?
Tamminen
Posts: 1347
Joined: April 19th, 2016, 2:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Tamminen »

Steve3007 wrote: September 23rd, 2018, 8:37 am I think the reason that the proposition "there is nothing but matter" cannot be justified is that the concept of matter is just one of the available concepts that we might find useful for describing and predicting our observations. Others are available. And we have no idea what others may become available in the future.
Yes, this is another reason.
I think the proposition that objects exist independent of our direct observations of them can be useful if the proposed existence of those objects describes/predicts indirect observations.
Yes, that is true. And I have not said anywhere that objects do no exist independent of our direct observations of them. I have said that their being is not independent of the being of subjects. These are totally different things.
I try not to set too much store by intuition.
I think there are many implicit assumptions we are not aware of which are based on intuitions, and some of those intuitions may be too superficial, as though they were left half-way. One of those superficial intuitions is the possibility of the universe without subjects.
I personally think that the only really meaningful question is whether this worldview of yours actually makes you behave any differently from a person who subscribes to a version of Materialism. What difference does it make?
Not much in my everyday life, but as human beings we have those existential questions of being and non-being, finitude and eternity and so on. And as human beings we are amazingly curious about what this all is about. So am I. And philosophy, as I see it, tries to clarify these questions, and tries to find a language that can express something about them. Do you never meditate on these things?
User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 1122
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by ThomasHobbes »

Steve3007 wrote: September 23rd, 2018, 6:12 am
ThomasHobbes wrote:The Philosophical lexicon comprises of very precise terms.
It's just "comprises" not "comprises of".
You are WRONG.

I'm a Cambridge boy and an advanced thinker.. Is English a second language to you?

"The Oxford English Dictionary regards the construction "comprised of" as incorrect,[1] while Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary and Collins English Dictionary do not regard it as such, mentioning "comprised of" among the examples.[2][3]"

WIKI
User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 1122
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by ThomasHobbes »

Tamminen wrote: September 22nd, 2018, 4:39 pm
ThomasHobbes wrote: September 22nd, 2018, 3:49 pm

On what grounds?
I do not know if you have read my conversation with Fooloso4 above, but I suggest you read it so that we don't have to repeat the same arguments here again. If you draw the same conclusions as Fooloso4, that is fine with me, and if you have fruitful ideas on the matter, that is better still.
You are basically saying the same thing.
as '"The reality of experiential states is a fact that precedes any physical evolution of mental properties.""
Tamminen
Posts: 1347
Joined: April 19th, 2016, 2:53 pm

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Tamminen »

ThomasHobbes wrote: September 23rd, 2018, 1:51 pm You are basically saying the same thing.
as '"The reality of experiential states is a fact that precedes any physical evolution of mental properties.""
This sentence is a bit ambiguous and I am not sure what BigBango means by it. I would say that because the being of experiential states needs a material basis, the physical evolution precedes those experiential states in physical time, but what really happens is the evolution of consciousness, not matter in itself which would produce consciousness as a kind of side effect or accident.
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Whatever Consciousness is, it's Not Physical (or reducible to physical).

Post by Consul »

ThomasHobbes wrote: September 23rd, 2018, 1:50 pm
Steve3007 wrote: September 23rd, 2018, 6:12 am It's just "comprises" not "comprises of".

You are WRONG.
I'm a Cambridge boy and an advanced thinker.. Is English a second language to you?
"The Oxford English Dictionary regards the construction "comprised of" as incorrect,[1] while Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary and Collins English Dictionary do not regard it as such, mentioning "comprised of" among the examples.[2][3]"
That "compriseD of" is correct doesn't mean that "compriseS of" is correct too.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
Post Reply

Return to “Epistemology and Metaphysics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021