Is a priori knowledge possible?
- SimpleGuy
- Posts: 338
- Joined: September 11th, 2017, 12:28 pm
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
- SimpleGuy
- Posts: 338
- Joined: September 11th, 2017, 12:28 pm
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
- SimpleGuy
- Posts: 338
- Joined: September 11th, 2017, 12:28 pm
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
- SimpleGuy
- Posts: 338
- Joined: September 11th, 2017, 12:28 pm
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
http://funkkolleg-philosophie.de/zusatz ... -folge-09/
I cite in german according to this webpage:
Die Frage nach Sein und Zeit (Bayerischer Rundfunk)
Im Radiobeitrag des Bayerischen Rundfunks wird Martin Heideggers bekanntes und komplexes Werk Sein und Zeit auf verständliche Weise vorgestellt. In diesem Werk widmet Heidegger sich im zweiten Kapitel den Grenzen des Daseins und damit einhergehend dem „Sein zum Tode“.
I am claiming , that this suicide was the consequence of mobbing and discrimination in an intruiguing way.
- SimpleGuy
- Posts: 338
- Joined: September 11th, 2017, 12:28 pm
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
In the preface they talk how it is, to be for oneself as a question for modern moral philosophical ethics which is represented through the persons and their actions. For the author of the preface it's not important if the metaphysical question what a person is really for but the real world phenomenological question , how it's like to be at all a person (or personality).
This and even more should give you a hint.
- SimpleGuy
- Posts: 338
- Joined: September 11th, 2017, 12:28 pm
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
- SimpleGuy
- Posts: 338
- Joined: September 11th, 2017, 12:28 pm
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/philo/uploa ... 54-60x.pdf
It's about beeing a moral personality, in the sense of discrimination or mobbing for the society.
- SimpleGuy
- Posts: 338
- Joined: September 11th, 2017, 12:28 pm
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
I will have to revisit Being and Time to present this clearer. But then, I do take Husserl's and kant's side here.
- SimpleGuy
- Posts: 338
- Joined: September 11th, 2017, 12:28 pm
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
-
- Posts: 499
- Joined: November 15th, 2017, 1:59 am
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
Aristotle finally got something right; Knowledge = experience!Scott wrote: ↑June 29th, 2009, 10:46 pm In this thread I want us to debate whether a priori knowledge is possible. Some philosophers argue that some knowledge is a priori (fully independent from experience). In contrast, radical empiricists argue that all knowledge is a posteriori (derived from experience).
No 'cause/effect', no division at all.
There is only experience/Knowledge each moment of existence!
- SimpleGuy
- Posts: 338
- Joined: September 11th, 2017, 12:28 pm
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
- SimpleGuy
- Posts: 338
- Joined: September 11th, 2017, 12:28 pm
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
-
- Posts: 1780
- Joined: January 27th, 2012, 9:32 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Hermese Trismegistus
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
Not so !I only want to make clear that you are working with the assumption that there are no absolutes,
singularity having no relative, numerical value, having a numerical value of Zero-0 is transfigured, converted, is reborn, a Singularity of One-1, as it becomes relative by becoming the first in a series, the beginning of a process such as the Evolutionary Process, becomes the beginning of a continuum such as Space-Time, becomes the direct cause of a series of events known to be the direct cause of the system of Chaos which made manifest Reality, the Heavens and the Earth, the Universe, (as in the Butterfly Effect) being the direct cause of the Reality of Everything that exists in the material sense of the word, of even a rock.
The metaphysical transfiguration, the conversion, of a random Singularity of Zero-0, into a Singularity of One-1, becoming an Affect, “The Reality of “ First” Cause.
An Affect, a random Singularity having no relative numerical, having a numerical value of Zero-0 has the potential of becoming, without effort, of becoming the indirect cause of a series of Events, of system of Chaos, by becoming Relative, attaining a numerical value of One-1, a Singularity having a dual quality 0/1 being transcendental.
Hermes trismegistus keep of the Holy Grail, Lord of the Ring.
Ye, Amen-Ra------>0
-
- Posts: 1780
- Joined: January 27th, 2012, 9:32 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Hermese Trismegistus
Re: Is a priori knowledge possible?
The motion of a Singularity having no relative numerical value, having a numerical value of Zero-0, simply because it has no angular momentum, no velocity of speed and direction is not measurable as to location and momentum, is meaningless, does not exist.
However a Singularity of Zero-0 is transcendental, has the potentiality of being a duality, being converted into the Reality of First Cause.
0/1.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023