If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it,

Discuss any topics related to metaphysics (the philosophical study of the principles of reality) or epistemology (the philosophical study of knowledge) in this forum.
Post Reply

If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

yes
129
66%
no
67
34%
 
Total votes: 196

TurtleSpeaks
Posts: 11
Joined: October 18th, 2010, 6:27 am

If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it,

Post by TurtleSpeaks »

This one just pisses me off.

Of course it does.

That's not even counting the possibility of going there afterward and detecting changes in the environment.

Opinions?
User avatar
Tylerium
Posts: 142
Joined: August 23rd, 2010, 10:44 am

Post by Tylerium »

No. Sound is the brain's perception of air molecules vibrating across a distance and for a duration. Yes, the tree still moves all those air molecules when it falls, but it makes no sound because there is nobody around to translate those vibrating molecules into sound.
Never stop learning new things.
TurtleSpeaks
Posts: 11
Joined: October 18th, 2010, 6:27 am

Post by TurtleSpeaks »

The definition of sound should be reworded here...because that's not really the point of the question.

Actually, a better question would be:

If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to observe it in any way, does it still fall?
User avatar
Mark
Posts: 781
Joined: September 21st, 2010, 10:56 am

Post by Mark »

A forest is usually filled with animals/bugs though. They tend to hear sounds.

But my interpretation of this quote is more like this: "is a fact a fact only when someone (human) can prove it/detect it, or can a fact exist anyway?" To me, the sound part is only a metaphor.

Therefore I believe it is YES, because a fact (action/sound/whatever) is still there (or has been there), even if it cannot be "proved". The fact in itself doesn't need to be proved, to exist.
Kapra
Posts: 195
Joined: October 6th, 2010, 7:22 am

Post by Kapra »

The answer can be yes or no.
The science = Sound waves travel when a tree falls.
The philosophy of language would ask you to = define a tree? define falling? define what sound means? In other words you could be defining tree as a bird, and falling as flying? Like a morse code. EG spys would ask this question but the answer isn`t anything like the play on words they use.

I need you to define what you mean by no one ]is around [/color] are humans none existant in this hypothesis? The word IS in that sentence implies no one "IS" ie the extinction of humanity
Is this a question about trees falling before man existed?
Could it be heard falling if no one was around no of course not because no one was around (here on earth) to hear it. By no one you are implying humans I presume?
Stev7467
Posts: 2
Joined: October 18th, 2010, 12:02 pm

Post by Stev7467 »

Of course it does. Lets not make this any harder than it is. Just because no one is around to experience it dosnt mean that the physics change.
User avatar
美国g
Posts: 73
Joined: October 1st, 2010, 11:30 pm
Location: China PR

Post by 美国g »

It's fun to think about "did the tree fall?".. I like that as the best explanation...

I'm having troubles relating it to a situation of relevance though. If an old man who no one alive has ever heard of dies, has he died? To the world, his existence is non existent, so his death has no effect- in a way of speaking. Does a non existent life hold meaning? I think this is the best question!

Okay, so here is my translation of the question. If a human being dies, and no one has ever heard of him, his deeds, or anything relating to him. Did his life have meaning? I mean... disregarding any things he could have done to leave a trace of his existence, I'd say that his life in itself was meaningless. Dust...

I think this can apply to almost all of man kind. If we don't do something that leaves our mark on the world, than millenniums from now, we never existed.
Please don't tell me I can't do it... It gets old -.-
Kapra
Posts: 195
Joined: October 6th, 2010, 7:22 am

Post by Kapra »

The only point I am making is that the sentence isn`t one that can be answered simply. I would need to read the entire reason for the questioner asking it. Who is the questioner? If this was a question of the tree falling in a forest in a sci fi novel, the tree and forest could be in outer space, which means they fall and float, without sound. If this question was asked by an international spy it could be a code and not literally mean what is being asking. If no one IS around then no one would hear it make a sound.

I think that if this is to be only a science question its not a philosophy question if it only means what science means by it.
It's fun to think about "did the tree fall?".. I like that as the best explanation...
Haha good analogy. It isn`t saying the tree did fall, its asking IF
User avatar
美国g
Posts: 73
Joined: October 1st, 2010, 11:30 pm
Location: China PR

Post by 美国g »

Kapra wrote:The only point I am making is that the sentence isn`t one that can be answered simply. I would need to read the entire reason for the questioner asking it. Who is the questioner? If this was a question of the tree falling in a forest in a sci fi novel, the tree and forest could be in outer space, which means they fall and float, without sound. If this question was asked by an international spy it could be a code and not literally mean what is being asking. If no one IS around then no one would hear it make a sound.

I think that if this is to be only a science question its not a philosophy question if it only means what science means by it.
It's fun to think about "did the tree fall?".. I like that as the best explanation...
Haha good analogy. It isn`t saying the tree did fall, its asking IF
Haha, this is going to sound a bit rude, and I'm sorry to say it, but it's funny! Please don't be upset :P

I think this is a philosophy forum, so I think we can generally assume that the question is being asked as a philosophical question, and is not mean to be taken with regard to the questioner seeing as the questioner is, himself, a philosopher.

I highly doubt that this is a question meant to be taken literally.
Please don't tell me I can't do it... It gets old -.-
Kapra
Posts: 195
Joined: October 6th, 2010, 7:22 am

Post by Kapra »

I highly doubt that this is a question meant to be taken literally.
I was commenting to the OP Turtle who thinks it is a literal matter of fact and science. I found my comment is in context to the replies pertaining to the science as evidence. You were not being rude, you were misinterpreting my observation without asking who I was speaking to though. I highly doubt I have said it should be taken literally! In fact I know I didn`t say that, you did, out of context to what I was saying. IF the question is only one to be answered by science then it isn`t a philosophical question being placed by the OP.
Flikissimekado
Posts: 3
Joined: October 20th, 2010, 7:06 pm

Sorry it's so long!

Post by Flikissimekado »

Mark wrote:a fact (action/sound/whatever) is still there (or has been there), even if it cannot be "proved". The fact in itself doesn't need to be proved, to exist.
If Schrödinger disagreed, but nobody was around to hear him, did he still have a point?

Or, to put it a little less facetiously, the work left in his wake is to the fact of his refutation as sylvan debris are to the fact of a tree's toppling in a forest. Forgive me for singling you out when in fact I respect what you're saying perfectly well; my tendency to philosophical ambivalence is easily overwhelmed by my enthusiasm for casual Elenchus. To whit, of all the rebuttals I might have chosen, indeed of all the positions I might have chosen to critique, these were simply the two most pleasingly paradoxical in their symbiosis.

In any case, what I intended to add has already been posited in its essentials; namely that I've always taken this to be a reminder of the semantic nature of much of what we take for granted as 'true' or real. We talk of sound as if it is a real world phenomenon(*) when in fact as a word it defines uniquely the sensation of such a phenomenon. I have always assumed, quite possibly incorrectly - I like some of the interpretations here - that the assertion that 'nobody is around to hear it' is an appropriately colloquial rendering of "there is no thing x such that x is capable of registering vibrations as 'sounds'". In effect I have tended to assume the question is something along the lines of 'is there any more to a sound (as distinct from vibration) than the fact of its being heard', to which I'm inclined to say 'no', but am always open to persuasion :)


(*)Here I lay aside questions of whether any such thing 'exists' given the neural nature of experience and mean simply to distinguish external/physical stimuli (eg an empty stomach) from internal/psychic perception (eg the sensation of hunger)
Tfindlay
Posts: 237
Joined: August 31st, 2010, 9:33 pm

Post by Tfindlay »

Of course it does.
A sound is, by definition, something that is heard. Vibrating air that is not heard is simply vibrating air. So if there is no one there to hear the vibrations in the air made by the tree falling it does not make a sound, it only causes the air to vibrate.
If a human being dies, and no one has ever heard of him, his deeds, or anything relating to him. Did his life have meaning?
Meaning is that which makes a difference. In the case of this or anyone else the meaning of a life is the difference the life has made. Every life makes some difference in terms of things like the food one consumes, the air one breathes, or the acts that one performs that affect other things (like picking a flower or stepping on a stick and breaking it). It is a question of the degree of difference one makes within a given context. In the context of my immediate family my life is quite meaningful but in the context of the world's population it is quite meaningless.
User avatar
Mark
Posts: 781
Joined: September 21st, 2010, 10:56 am

Re: Sorry it's so long!

Post by Mark »

Flikissimekado wrote: If Schrödinger disagreed, but nobody was around to hear him, did he still have a point?
Can you, with this quote, prove that he didn't have a point?
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13821
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Post by Belinda »

George Berkeley pronounces that if the tree falls in the forest and nobody not even a sparrow is there to hear or see it, God still hears and sees it. GB was a tremendous sceptic and nevertheless a bishop so he would have had to say that God sees and hears even although no mortal (including bugs and sparrows) sees or hears. I think that GB was a bishop who really believed in God.

I like GB's scepticism very much but I dont believe in GB's God so I think that the tree does not fall in the forest if there is nobody(bug, sparrow or human) to whom this would have any meaning.

The corollary of what I think about this is that without consciousnesses that make meanings, nothing happens. There is no cosmos without consciousnesses.Without consciousnesses there may be some Tao thingy of which we conscious mortals cannot possibly have any notion.
TFindlay wrote
A sound is, by definition, something that is heard. Vibrating air that is not heard is simply vibrating air. So if there is no one there to hear the vibrations in the air made by the tree falling it does not make a sound, it only causes the air to vibrate.
so I think that TFindlay would have to agree with me to some extent. I'd go further though and say that vibrating air is a meaning and therefore presupposes consciousness.
Socialist
User avatar
reflected_light
Posts: 347
Joined: October 4th, 2009, 3:15 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Post by reflected_light »

Belinda, would you go as far to say that when you turn around, that which you were just looking at ceases to exist? (if no other stimuli is coming from that direction)
Post Reply

Return to “Epistemology and Metaphysics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021