Is faith synonymous with self-delusion?

Discuss any topics related to metaphysics (the philosophical study of the principles of reality) or epistemology (the philosophical study of knowledge) in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Prismatic
Posts: 514
Joined: April 22nd, 2012, 4:30 pm
Favorite Philosopher: John Stuart Mill

Re: Is faith synonymous with self-delusion?

Post by Prismatic »

Scott wrote: Again, I would say that the inductive evidence is very weak evidence that "something is wrong" so to speak. However, I think that is also a moot point. It seems to me like in the absence of any evidence that 'something is not wrong' it would be delusional to believe something is not wrong regardless of whether I had that little bit of evidence that something is wrong. (In reality, I think I would also have evidence even if equally weak that something is not wrong because I could induce from the fact that most days nothing goes wrong; her habits are regular but so is things not going wrong which seems to be two weak inductions that cancel each other out.) I just don't see why that tiny bit of evidence against the evidence-less belief turns it into delusion, particularly if the evidence-less belief is held confidently. Does someone who reasonably suspects something therefore believe it? If not, then the utter lack of evidence is so far removed from the probable cause that would warrant belief that the little extra evidence against isn't needed to make the person delusional because the person doesn't even have enough evidence to reasonably suspect the thing let alone have probable cause.
Again, I suspect that the entire question turns on whether or not you consider inductive experience to constitute evidence and if so, what interpretation you place upon it.
Everywhere I have sought peace and never found it except in a corner with a book. —Thomas à Kempis
User avatar
Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
The admin formerly known as Scott
Posts: 5765
Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
Contact:

Re: Is faith synonymous with self-delusion?

Post by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes »

I don't understand why.

First, for the sake of argument, let's temporarily assume that inductive experience does constitute evidence. (Let's also ignore any evidence that nothing is wrong with my wife in the hypothetical example such as an induction based on the previous experience that all other nights nothing has gone wrong, so that to match with the topic there is no evidence that nothing is wrong.) Is my hypothetical belief that nothing is wrong delusional? You agree with me in the case and we both say, yes, because as long as there is a little evidence to the contrary and no evidence to support the belief then we both say it is delusional.

Now, let's assume that that little bit of induction from experience doesn't count as evidence. (Again we also have to ignore any evidence that nothing is wrong with my wife in the hypothetical example such as an induction based on the previous experience that all other nights nothing has gone wrong, so that to match with the topic there is no evidence that nothing is wrong.) Now we have no evidence either way. Is it delusional to believe nothing is wrong with my wife even though I have no evidence at all for it? I would say yes, it is still delusional under these pretenses. (However, I happen to think it does count as evidence, but just very slight evidence. But that is moot here since I think it is delusional regardless.)

I don't see what this example is supposed to show. I think the presence of a little bit of evidence to the contrary or not doesn't change whether or not it is delusion so what does it matter to my argument if the inductive evidence counts or not?

I don't understand why you think it is delusional to believe something when there is no evidence for it but ever so slightly some evidence against it, yet you don't think it is delusional to believe that thing when there is no evidence for it and no evidence against it. What difference does that little bit of evidence make when we are so far off from probable cause in either direction?
My entire political philosophy summed up in one tweet.

"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."

I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
User avatar
James195101
Posts: 141
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 6:48 am

Re: Is faith synonymous with self-delusion?

Post by James195101 »

The conscious brain needs faith to join the roller coaster provided by the sub-conscious brain. The sub-conscious is directing its organism (us) to proceed through the human life phases, which we (the conscious brain) experience via emotions, feelings, desires, and perhaps even 'still small voices'. The sub-conscious brain feels like god to the conscious brain - the sub-conscious does have own own best interests at heart even if we do not fully understand them. People know this faith is essential and so fiercely defend whatever mechanism they need to prop up the faith, even if it is illogical (miracles etc).
User avatar
Prismatic
Posts: 514
Joined: April 22nd, 2012, 4:30 pm
Favorite Philosopher: John Stuart Mill

Re: Is faith synonymous with self-delusion?

Post by Prismatic »

Scott wrote: I don't understand why you think it is delusional to believe something when there is no evidence for it but ever so slightly some evidence against it, yet you don't think it is delusional to believe that thing when there is no evidence for it and no evidence against it. What difference does that little bit of evidence make when we are so far off from probable cause in either direction?
In practice it makes little difference, but in maintaining clarity of thought it seems to me to make a respectable difference. It is deluding yourself to ignore evidence you have no matter whether large or small, while in the absence of any evidence whatever you are free to hypothesize and take something, at least for the time being, on faith. You are still likely often to be in the wrong and you may legitimately be called irrational, but not, I think delusional. As soon as valid evidence appears, you are obliged to withdraw from speculation and look for more evidence.

The important point is as Clifford put it,
To sum up: it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.
Everywhere I have sought peace and never found it except in a corner with a book. —Thomas à Kempis
User avatar
Ser10Rec1pr0
Posts: 90
Joined: May 3rd, 2012, 9:38 am
Favorite Philosopher: Harold Garfinkel

Re: Is faith synonymous with self-delusion?

Post by Ser10Rec1pr0 »

Just because people claim faith is no reason to accept that it is faith. The 20th century sociologist William I. Thomas wrote something to the effect (as cited by Erving Goffman) that we do not live statistically and scientifically but by inference: we invite friends over and we infer from past experience that they will not steal our good silverware.

We might say that we have faith, but faith with its religious implications seems too strong a word for the examples here. If the wife maintains this “faith” (infers her husband is not cheating), then the evidence, however strong it may seem to us, is apparently not so strong. If there is a pattern of such occasions (more panties, lipstick on a shirt collar; and these days the usually benign “other people you may know” on Facebook), that so-called faith can dwindle. Gregory Bateson wrote that mammals (including human beings) arrange their lives on patterns of experience or episodes; not single events.

By these examples, we are not told of any previous experience on the part of the wife or mother that should be cause to shake the faith, although unlike the wife and the suspicious underwear, mom there is operating solely on what her son told her. “Underqualified” is an appellation in the narrative: we are not told that the prospective employer thought he was underqualified or whether mom somehow knows he’s underqualified; we’re told that others were much more qualified.

These seem more examples of what Sartre called bad faith: deliberate ignorance; “I don’t wanna know” (whether he’s cheating, whether someone else got the job). This bad faith, taken to extreme, may result in delusion.
User avatar
Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
The admin formerly known as Scott
Posts: 5765
Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
Contact:

Re: Is faith synonymous with self-delusion?

Post by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes »

When people say that they have 'belief not based on material evidence or logical proof' in the context of the examples in the OP, I think they are admitting that their belief simply doesn't match up with evidence. This is why I call it self-delusion rather than just delusion. The person not only seems delusional, but they seem to diagnosis themselves and actively will themselves to continue to be delusional.

Ser10Rec1pr0, you say that deliberate ignorance is indeed delusion in the extreme. But why only the extreme?

***

Prismatic, you have given me something to think about. Thank you!
My entire political philosophy summed up in one tweet.

"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."

I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
Post Reply

Return to “Epistemology and Metaphysics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021