The Philosophy Forums at OnlinePhilosophyClub.com aim to be an oasis of intelligent in-depth civil debate and discussion. Topics discussed extend far beyond philosophy and philosophers. What makes us a philosophy forum is more about our approach to the discussions than what subject is being debated. Common topics include but are absolutely not limited to neuroscience, psychology, sociology, cosmology, religion, political theory, ethics, and so much more.
This is a humans-only philosophy club. We strictly prohibit bots and AIs from joining.
As a reply to this question, I believe that morality is often subjective to one's own set of views, as an example, would you risk a hundred lives to save one individual? An intelligent individual may see the issue with this, however on basis of morality you could claim there was the possibility none of them would die if you sent them, and that that person could've been saved, but you opted not to take the risk, which is immoral in some people's own personal view. In short, without running the risk of boring you, I'll conclude with, intelligent individuals I believe understand at times in life you must be immoral at times, they just know when those times are, better than most, however this is not to say they don't attempt to be moral, also as a side note, let us also remember everyone can be immoral, cruel etc. if they so choose regardless of if you are intelligent, or not.