Does Ethics have something to say about automatic responses

Discuss morality and ethics in this message board.
Featured Article: Philosophical Analysis of Abortion, The Right to Life, and Murder
Post Reply
User avatar
Jan Pahl
Posts: 20
Joined: September 6th, 2017, 3:22 pm

Does Ethics have something to say about automatic responses

Post by Jan Pahl »

I really don´t have any problem with Ethics and the genetic, epigenetic, physiological, neuro-plasticity (for example learning), cognitive and cultural issues. Like Konrad Lorenz (one of the fathers of ethology) once said (not verbatim), If we assume that besides our will we also have to understand other concurrent or concomitants influences that make us behave, think and have motivations, emotions and tropisms, them accepting our biological status has human beings with a phylogenetic and ontogenetic history, we can accepting it, sublime our own psyche, in other words the study of Ethics is possible and even very much desirable for our culture specially if the product of ethic systems don´t deny our biological concomitants.


The real problem with ethics not arise with our will being shaped also by things different of pure reasoning and things that had to be leaned like aristotelian Habitus, cognitive vaccines of Stoicism, learned homeostasis of the hedonic in Epicureanism, the “homunculus” of Nietzsche ubermensch, Marxist “new man” or rawls empathy homunculus thought experiment and a large Etc. If the later examples have “problems”, they are problems of feasibility. Them the real problem arise not with feasibility since feasibility problems can be solved (at least theoretically) with a re examination of the ethical system, what keeps problematic is the issue of automatic responses not even possible to by shaped by practice or habitus.


How ethics can apply (if can) to real life common situations like reacting in a car to an unexpected person crossing the street, the quick “fitting-froze-escaping” of an unexpected fist ready to hit to the face or a important job decision that have to be maid immediately with few if any data, time or lapse for reasoning but only a cuasi automatic emotional response?. Obviously examples can be customize sæcula sæculorum, them the issue at hand it´s for me a real problem inside ethics


Can ethics deal of have something to say to that large set of every day situations, many of them of real importance?

Thanks a lot
Name: Jan
Surname: Pahl
From Caracas, Venezuela
User avatar
Atreyu
Posts: 1737
Joined: June 17th, 2014, 3:11 am
Favorite Philosopher: P.D. Ouspensky
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Does Ethics have something to say about automatic respon

Post by Atreyu »

No. Ethics will in no way explain our instinctive functions, nor can it help us to overcome them.

That lies in the realm of psychology (science), not ethics (moral philosophy).
User avatar
Burning ghost
Posts: 3065
Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am

Re: Does Ethics have something to say about automatic respon

Post by Burning ghost »

In the sense of instilling moral responsibility, it has a function. I would steer away from the idea of "ethics" in the sense of "social law" though and remain very much in the individualist approach.

By this I mean think about given situations and moral dilemmas where you struggle to find a "right" choice. Then from there once a real life situation comes along you'll be, at least in some small way, more inclined to act as you'd like to act rather than react in ways you'd regret. This is, I hope, quite obviously an ongoing process in which we're continually balancing between feeling of guilt, responsibility, will, and hopelessness.

I have been talking about this on the thread Reason and Morality. I guess you've seen that?
AKA badgerjelly
Spectrum
Posts: 5161
Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various

Re: Does Ethics have something to say about automatic respon

Post by Spectrum »

The Framework and System of Morality and Ethics in perspective is as follows;
  • 1. Absolute Moral Laws (non-theistic)
    -Moral Gap
    2. Ethical Maxims - Applied ethics
    -Ethical Gaps
    3. Actual actions
    4. Instincts
Instincts e.g. related to hunger will drive a person to actual actions.
These actions will be compared to existing ethical maxims and the deviation is the ethical gaps.
For example a person may steal a loaf of bread due to hunger.
The ethical maxim is Thou Shalt NOT Steal.
In this case it is ethically wrong to steal a loaf of bread and the thief may come up with all sorts of excuses to justify his/actions. There must be strategies for the thief to take correction actions to ensure s/he complied with the ethical Law on theft in future.

Note the legislature and judiciary will play a role on the issue of theft [related to instincts of otherwise] with reference to law and penalties. Philosophically the judiciary is not directly morality and ethics but rather belongs to politics.

In addition to the ethical gap, there is the Moral Gap.
The Moral Gap measures the deviation from the actual act, the ethical maxim and the absolute moral standard.
This Moral Gap must be continually revised and improved so that the ethical maxims can be improved towards the absolute moral law [ideal].

The above model linking Morality [Pure] to Ethics [Applied] then to Actions and Instincts is applicable to all instincts and their consequential actions.
Not-a-theist. Religion is a critical necessity for humanity now, but not the FUTURE.
User avatar
Jan Pahl
Posts: 20
Joined: September 6th, 2017, 3:22 pm

Re: Does Ethics have something to say about automatic respon

Post by Jan Pahl »

Atreyu wrote:No. Ethics will in no way explain our instinctive functions, nor can it help us to overcome them.

That lies in the realm of psychology (science), not ethics (moral philosophy).
But had to exist ethical valuations, the scope and limits of ethics is also a valid epistemological problem for ethics, not only for science.

Science can´t do ethics even if they can give a lot of data that can be used by philosophers, but scientific methods don´t deal with ethics even if the people behind science take ethics very seriously
User avatar
Burning ghost
Posts: 3065
Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am

Re: Does Ethics have something to say about automatic respon

Post by Burning ghost »

I think it is reasonably well accepted that if someone is "out of there mind" they are not responsible for their actions. The question then becomes are they "out of their minds" due to lack of responsibility or through choice. If they chose to take that road they must be held responsible for their actions to at least some extent.

This is essentially a question of "willful" control rather than bad habits right? The law struggles with this kind of thing with pleas of insanity and such. Damage to the brain may make someone aggressive and murderous, in these situations once the person has recovered then we can hardly blame them for what happened. If they are born in such a way (meaning congenitally aggressive/murderous) and have always been so, then the blame is with the person. We can hardly start blaming X or Y gene for the crime above the person themselves, yet we can blame a condition/injury that has come into effect on the persons "normal" state.

What Spectrum was talking about elsewhere, which is a very interesting topic humanity will have to face, is what happens when we can see that certain brains are congenitally "murderous"/"aggressive"? We already know that certain genes that are present in all psychopaths are also present in non-psychopaths. Here we see that nurture, certain environment triggers, most likely play a big part. The most congenitally passive human baby could no doubt be conditioned toward violence and murder, it is simply that they'd resist that path more than others of differing genetic disposition.
AKA badgerjelly
Post Reply

Return to “Ethics and Morality”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021