The drive towards a blissful afterlife
- soucelyzac
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: April 27th, 2018, 10:34 am
The drive towards a blissful afterlife
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7991
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
Basically you are trying to equate gratification and delayed gratification. They’re commonly felt to be opposite ends of the same spectrum.soucelyzac wrote: ↑April 27th, 2018, 10:37 am Evaluative hedonism is the perpetual "quest" for pleasure. It is the belief that our "core" sources of motivation are seeking pleasure and avoiding pain. With that in mind, is it sound philosophically to say that people seeking eteral bliss and avoiding eternal torment could be consired meta-hedonists?
- soucelyzac
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: April 27th, 2018, 10:34 am
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
Even if it isn't instant gratification, it shouldn't matter, since I specified evaluative/ethical hedonism. Evaluative hedonism differ from "classical" hedonism by this exact criteria: maximum overall pleasure.LuckyR wrote: ↑April 28th, 2018, 2:34 amBasically you are trying to equate gratification and delayed gratification. They’re commonly felt to be opposite ends of the same spectrum.soucelyzac wrote: ↑April 27th, 2018, 10:37 am Evaluative hedonism is the perpetual "quest" for pleasure. It is the belief that our "core" sources of motivation are seeking pleasure and avoiding pain. With that in mind, is it sound philosophically to say that people seeking eteral bliss and avoiding eternal torment could be consired meta-hedonists?
Therefore, in this context, it is logical to postulate that an individual maximizing pleasure by "going" to heaven and avoiding hell is in fact an evaluative hedonism.
Evaluative hedonism:"At its simplest, ethical hedonism is the claim that all and only pleasure has positive importance and all and only pain or displeasure has negative importance. This importance is to be understood non-instrumentally, that is, independently of the importance of anything that pleasure or displeasure might cause or prevent. From ethical hedonism, it follows that if our relationships, achievements, knowledge, character states, and so on, have any non-instrumental importance, this is just a matter of any pleasure or displeasure that is in their natures. Otherwise, they have only instrumental importance through the pleasure they cause or displeasure they diminish. At least from the simple forms of ethical hedonism, it also follows that pleasure is good whenever it is had, even in matters that are themselves worthless or worse." (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hedonism/)
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7991
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
No, it totally matters.soucelyzac wrote: ↑May 4th, 2018, 4:34 pmEven if it isn't instant gratification, it shouldn't matter, since I specified evaluative/ethical hedonism. Evaluative hedonism differ from "classical" hedonism by this exact criteria: maximum overall pleasure.
Therefore, in this context, it is logical to postulate that an individual maximizing pleasure by "going" to heaven and avoiding hell is in fact an evaluative hedonism.
Evaluative hedonism:"At its simplest, ethical hedonism is the claim that all and only pleasure has positive importance and all and only pain or displeasure has negative importance. This importance is to be understood non-instrumentally, that is, independently of the importance of anything that pleasure or displeasure might cause or prevent. From ethical hedonism, it follows that if our relationships, achievements, knowledge, character states, and so on, have any non-instrumental importance, this is just a matter of any pleasure or displeasure that is in their natures. Otherwise, they have only instrumental importance through the pleasure they cause or displeasure they diminish. At least from the simple forms of ethical hedonism, it also follows that pleasure is good whenever it is had, even in matters that are themselves worthless or worse." (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hedonism/)
For example, if A seeks whichever choice gives him instant pleasure, he will have a lot of cheap thrills. Of course he will pay the price down the line when painful bad things happen to him, but in the bubble he lives in, he could conclude that these "consequences" of his actions happened TO him (from the Universe) they aren't his "choice", yet any outside observer would note that they are, in fact the result of his shortsighted choices and thus his pleasurable choices were also choices for longer range pain (thus breaking his Hedonistic goal). Therefore since every choice has pros and cons, pleasure and pain, the classic Hedonist definition is illogical.
While B plans for delayed gratification, let's say eternal pleasure in Heaven. So he makes painful choices here on earth. By your equating A and B's styles, he could be a Hedonist too. But by that logic everyone is a Hedonist, since as mentioned every choice has good and bad, ie there is no risk-free path. The whole system of categorization breaks down.
- soucelyzac
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: April 27th, 2018, 10:34 am
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
I literally included a definition of what I meant by evaluative hedonism, but you do not seem to be adressing my argument.
If an individual acts according to the prescriptions of his faith solely for the reward, is he an evaluative hedonist?
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7991
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
A typical hedonist is the definition of instant gratification. A pious churchgoer who is banking on eternal bliss in the afterlife is the textbook example of delayed gratification.soucelyzac wrote: ↑June 14th, 2018, 12:41 pm I think you misunderstood my point, I stated that it didn't matter since, in the OP, it is specified that I'm talking about evaluative hedonism. I don't understand why you think I'm conflating instant and delayed gratification. Nothing in my original post implies this...
I literally included a definition of what I meant by evaluative hedonism, but you do not seem to be adressing my argument.
If an individual acts according to the prescriptions of his faith solely for the reward, is he an evaluative hedonist?
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
Perhaps you should define "evaluative hedonism". The problem is, all three have some merit, and you can't just use one as an example of the basic drives of living organisms and set that one against the Christian notion of heaven.soucelyzac wrote: ↑April 27th, 2018, 10:37 am Evaluative hedonism is the perpetual "quest" for pleasure. It is the belief that our "core" sources of motivation are seeking pleasure and avoiding pain. With that in mind, is it sound philosophically to say that people seeking eteral bliss and avoiding eternal torment could be consired meta-hedonists?
So, you would have to differentiate personal happiness (which can be very much more complex than mere pleasure) and attainable goals or the common good (which are even more complicated), from simple physical sensation. Then, for a reasonable comparison with the quest for eternal life, you would have to be clear on what kind of heaven and hell is being considered and what the qualifications - and costs - are for attaining them.The three basic types of philosophical hedonism are psychological hedonism, which holds that the tendency to seek pleasure and avoid pain is an essential attribute of human nature; evaluative or ethical hedonism, which sets up certain ethical or moral ends as desirable because attaining them will result in happiness; and reflective, or normative hedonism, which seeks to define value in terms of pleasure.http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Hedonism
But, of course, such a comparison is moot anyway, since all hedonism is predicated on a materialist interpretation of the world: the assumption that there is no afterlife to which one can defer gratification, so there can be no meta-hedonism.
The idea of heaven was nothing more than a booby-prize for letting kings and bishops walk all over you.
- ThomasHobbes
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm
-
- Posts: 948
- Joined: February 16th, 2018, 11:28 am
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
If they frame their beliefs in that way, meaning they tend to divide reality that way, then perhaps. I don't think most theists frame in only or mainly in these terms.soucelyzac wrote: ↑April 27th, 2018, 10:37 am Evaluative hedonism is the perpetual "quest" for pleasure. It is the belief that our "core" sources of motivation are seeking pleasure and avoiding pain. With that in mind, is it sound philosophically to say that people seeking eteral bliss and avoiding eternal torment could be consired meta-hedonists?
And hey, if any of us thought those were the options, even if we were not hedonists, we'd probably seek and avoid the same way.
-
- Posts: 948
- Joined: February 16th, 2018, 11:28 am
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
We could lump this all under hedonism, but people who are guided by the serotonin system do not end up in addiction problems, tend to act according to aesthetic, social and ethical priorities and have no really to have health problems related to their goals, at least not per se.
I see heaven often described in something much closer to the serotonin model than the dopamine.
If you are promising 40 virgins and the like, it's a different story.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7991
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
Or to use my wording: delayed to the point of the infinite.
- -1-
- Posts: 878
- Joined: December 1st, 2016, 2:23 am
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
Serotonin and Dopamine systems may differ only in the aspect that you can state a dopamine high at will, but you can't state a serotonin high at will. Not in a short-term basis, anyway.Karpel Tunnel wrote: ↑June 19th, 2018, 6:04 pm In the brain we have a couple of quite different systems that create goals. There is the dopamine, pleasure system - which gets wrapped up in addictions and direct pleasures and the serotonin contentment system which is not addictive and not the kinds of rush pleasure generally associated with hedonism. Peace, deep connection, closeness, intimacy, relaxation, meaningfulness and so on. Also a sense of doing what one is meant to do, to be in flow.
We could lump this all under hedonism, but people who are guided by the serotonin system do not end up in addiction problems, tend to act according to aesthetic, social and ethical priorities and have no really to have health problems related to their goals, at least not per se.
I see heaven often described in something much closer to the serotonin model than the dopamine.
If you are promising 40 virgins and the like, it's a different story.
You get addicted to dopamine highs because you have an ability to make it happen by many ways: natural and artificial ways. You can't do the same with serotonin highs.
This is a difference in the mechanism of creation and application of the two drugs in and by the human system; there may be other mechanisms as well.
- -1-
- Posts: 878
- Joined: December 1st, 2016, 2:23 am
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
most, if not all, self-destructive pleasures are that only because we have the means to enjoy them to excesses.
In historical terms (not necessarily in classical terms) hedonistic pleasures were very much life-sustaining and species-sustaining pleasures.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15154
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: The drive towards a blissful afterlife
I would be inclined to call it regular hedonism as conceived by ancients like Epicurus. In brief, hedonism is basically "playing the long game", eschewing short term gains for better overall gains. I don't know of anything in Epicurean hedonism that limits one's endeavours to one lifespan in preferring longer term gains to the sating of short-term urges. It's just very long term strategising :)soucelyzac wrote: ↑April 27th, 2018, 10:37 am Evaluative hedonism is the perpetual "quest" for pleasure. It is the belief that our "core" sources of motivation are seeking pleasure and avoiding pain. With that in mind, is it sound philosophically to say that people seeking eternal bliss and avoiding eternal torment could be considered meta-hedonists?
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023