An objection to the Golden Rule
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 28th, 2018, 4:37 pm
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: November 6th, 2016, 10:33 am
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
And I, for my part, am not going to exchange insults with you. That is no way to do philosophy, or indeed conduct oneself as a human being.
Have a nice day.
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: November 6th, 2016, 10:33 am
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
In case anyone is seriously worried, I was, of course, merely roleplaying in order to make a point. I have never been a nurse; before I retired, I was an office worker. My example was probably suggested to me because of my experience in looking after my wife, who has had cancer twice and also has a small brain tumour (thankfully inactive). I've noticed that one or two people in this forum can get very worried by philosophical ideas (quite unnecessarily, in my opinion - philosophy really isn't that kind of game, it's all too speculative to be taken that seriously). But apologies if anyone was really disturbed by what I wrote.Namelesss wrote: ↑May 7th, 2018, 6:31 amI hope that you claiming to be a nurse was hyperbole...CIN wrote: ↑May 7th, 2018, 5:35 am
I used to be a nurse working in a cancer hospital. Since I don't have cancer myself, I don't want to be injected with strong chemotherapy drugs. Following your new golden rule ("Do NOT do to others what you don't want done to you!"), I refused to inject any of the patients with these drugs, on the grounds that I don't want to be injected with them myself.
I have lost my job, and my prosecution for gross medical negligence comes up in court next week.
Over to you.
-
- Posts: 948
- Joined: February 16th, 2018, 11:28 am
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
No, you can always take into account the differences between you and others. You don't want things given to you that would harm you. Oysters harm you, but this does not mean you get to give peanuts to one of your friends since you are not allergic to peanuts, just oysters. You understand,even more than others, via your own allergy, what that would be like for you. It is not about the exact specifics of the actions, but the consequences.
Just as with the positive version of the golden rule.
Yes, if I am wakling down the street I do not want someone to tackles me and roll me around on the ground. At least, nearly always. However if I see a man on fire, I am, in Golden Rule terms, allowed to do this, to put the fire out.
-
- Posts: 948
- Joined: February 16th, 2018, 11:28 am
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
are not
action plans. They are not to save you thinking about the specific acts you must and must not perform.
You still need to figure out the specifics IN CONTEXT.
We are not all the same.
Contexts are not all the same.
You still have to think and intuit.
It's the attitude you base your choices on, not a short cut to deciding the specifics of the attitudes.
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: November 6th, 2016, 10:33 am
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
I entirely agree. But what that suggests to me is that the usual formulation of the Golden Rule is so inexact as to be positively misleading. 'Do as you would be done by' is expressed in terms of actions, not attitudes, and this is the main way in which it seems to me to be deficient. We would be better served by a formulation such as 'Give other people's best interests the same importance you would give your own'.Karpel Tunnel wrote: ↑May 8th, 2018, 2:22 am The Golden Rule and also Nameless' negative version
are not
action plans. They are not to save you thinking about the specific acts you must and must not perform.
You still need to figure out the specifics IN CONTEXT.
We are not all the same.
Contexts are not all the same.
You still have to think and intuit.
It's the attitude you base your choices on, not a short cut to deciding the specifics of the attitudes.
Even then, it can only be a rule of thumb. What about people who have committed serious crimes? Are we to treat their best interests as being as important as everyone else's? You could argue that it is in their best interests to be imprisoned or whatever, but this ignores most people's intuition that criminals don't deserve the same degree of consideration as those who have not committed crimes.
Perhaps the best we can do is something like 'Other things being equal, give other people's best interests at least the same consideration you would give your own'. Not very concise, I'm afraid.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
Medical ethics are established in laws, and grey areas are subject to legal process. This apart, a professional medical ethicist looking to new and ethically problematic medical situations will bring reason and compassion to the table.I used to be a nurse working in a cancer hospital. Since I don't have cancer myself, I don't want to be injected with strong chemotherapy drugs. Following your new golden rule ("Do NOT do to others what you don't want done to you!"), I refused to inject any of the patients with these drugs, on the grounds that I don't want to be injected with them myself.
I have lost my job, and my prosecution for gross medical negligence comes up in court next week.
The Golden Rule is imprecise but it is reasonable as far as it goes and it is compassionate in intention.
-
- Posts: 224
- Joined: April 30th, 2018, 4:51 pm
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
The Golden Rule is close to the truth, but not quite there, and attempts to tinker with its wording soon destroy its simplicity. A better approach (possibly the best one) to morality is to imagine that you are all the participants in a scenario (meaning that you'll have to live all their lives in turn) and to work out how they should behave so that you'll have the best overall time. Where a small amount of happiness for one person depends on causing a greater amount of unhappiness for another person, that would be a bad decision from which you would automatically lose out. This method appears to be compatible with utilitarianism. I think it's the subconscious way that most of us judge morality, and also that it inspired the Golden Rule which was an attempt to express the idea concisely.
-
- Posts: 499
- Joined: November 15th, 2017, 1:59 am
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
I see (nor intended) no insult.
I posted a valid, rational observation!
Any perceived criticism sends you running?
That seems far from anything considered philosophical discourse, to me.
(Have a 'nice day' to you, too! But if you want a 'nice day', philosophers are no one to hang with; "Philosophers are mind sharks!")
-
- Posts: 499
- Joined: November 15th, 2017, 1:59 am
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
Don't blame me, I merely offered the correct, rational, translation. *__-
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
That good method is compatible with utilitarianism because utilitarianism is the political manifestation of the subconscious urge to fairness.David Cooper wrote: ↑May 8th, 2018, 5:55 pm The Golden Rule can be adapted into many forms which attempt to debug it. "Never do to anyone anything they don't want done to them" gets around the problem of different likes and dislikes for different people, but even then there's a problem with people not always knowing what's best for them, and you don't want to be banned from punishing criminals either.
The Golden Rule is close to the truth, but not quite there, and attempts to tinker with its wording soon destroy its simplicity. A better approach (possibly the best one) to morality is to imagine that you are all the participants in a scenario (meaning that you'll have to live all their lives in turn) and to work out how they should behave so that you'll have the best overall time. Where a small amount of happiness for one person depends on causing a greater amount of unhappiness for another person, that would be a bad decision from which you would automatically lose out. This method appears to be compatible with utilitarianism. I think it's the subconscious way that most of us judge morality, and also that it inspired the Golden Rule which was an attempt to express the idea concisely.
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: November 6th, 2016, 10:33 am
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
Isn't the reason why you have falsely denied launching an ad hominem attack against me precisely so that you can have a nice day?Namelesss wrote: ↑May 8th, 2018, 9:43 pmI see (nor intended) no insult.
I posted a valid, rational observation!
Any perceived criticism sends you running?
That seems far from anything considered philosophical discourse, to me.
(Have a 'nice day' to you, too! But if you want a 'nice day', philosophers are no one to hang with; "Philosophers are mind sharks!")
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7984
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 28th, 2018, 4:37 pm
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
-
- Posts: 499
- Joined: November 15th, 2017, 1:59 am
Re: An objection to the Golden Rule
This is precisely the 'games', the emo games, that I refuse to waste my time playing with you. If you can have a real focused discussion, on the topic (rather than getting your panties all a'twist), then have at it.CIN wrote: ↑May 9th, 2018, 3:54 amIsn't the reason why you have falsely denied launching an ad hominem attack against me precisely so that you can have a nice day?Namelesss wrote: ↑May 8th, 2018, 9:43 pm
I see (nor intended) no insult.
I posted a valid, rational observation!
Any perceived criticism sends you running?
That seems far from anything considered philosophical discourse, to me.
(Have a 'nice day' to you, too! But if you want a 'nice day', philosophers are no one to hang with; "Philosophers are mind sharks!")
If you feel capable of pointing out, exactly, what you consider an ad-hom fallacy that I offered, then do it!!
If you can stay on topic, then do that, too.
(This is a philosophy site, not a juvenile therapy session for delicate egos.)
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023