There would be no need for food animals. Draft animals, maybe, once the fossil fuel runs out.
Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7932
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
Uummm... no. The pet food industry consumes more farmed meat than any country except the US, China, Russia and Brazil.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14992
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
False, because by that time (approximately the 12th of never) lab-grown meats will be perfected, clean, healthy, cheap and consumers will know exactly what's in it, eg. no risk of mad cow disease or poisons. Hell, looking at people's attitudes towards veganism, by the time time all people are keen to stop eating meat they will probably be digitised super-beings living in a quasi-virtual reality utilising alternative dimensions, and who no longer need to eat but instead absorb energy directly from spacetime ...
I take your point about protein, though, barring tech advances :)
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
Did neither of you look at the links I supplied? This isn't remote, some-day technology - it's already here enough to attract big investment. Israel is grappling with its kosherness; the beef association is bullying its tame legislators into drafting laws to copyright the word 'meat'. Like autonomous cars and the printing press, the next thing is unavoidable.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14992
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7932
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
The good news in this area (as in most areas) is that there is steady progress on many fronts. Less meat consumption in the west, growing support of better ranching practices, decreasing call for dairy products. Really it is the growing demand from the newly prosperous asian countries that are driving growth in the cheap, factory farming sector.Greta wrote: ↑May 15th, 2018, 12:14 amFalse, because by that time (approximately the 12th of never) lab-grown meats will be perfected, clean, healthy, cheap and consumers will know exactly what's in it, eg. no risk of mad cow disease or poisons. Hell, looking at people's attitudes towards veganism, by the time time all people are keen to stop eating meat they will probably be digitised super-beings living in a quasi-virtual reality utilising alternative dimensions, and who no longer need to eat but instead absorb energy directly from spacetime ...
I take your point about protein, though, barring tech advances
I forsee the culture industry cutting the legs out of the bottom of the market, the cheap, factory farmers. Whereas there will always be a market for high end, sustainable meat production. But just as not everyone can drive a Ferrari, the demand for it will be modest and the quantity and average suffering of farm animals will decline over time. Yay.
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
If you are a vegetarian or a vegan because of ethical considerations, be they environmental or cruelty concerns (or both). Is being a vegetarian going to make any difference to any of your concerns?
Now I'm not saying that if it won't make a difference you shouldn't bother (that's a whole different conversation) I just wonder if being a vegetarian/vegan is actually addressing your goals?
As an example. In the UK it was popular to wear a badge with something like 'no wars' written on it. To me that felt worse than pointless because it should be a given and, to my knowledge, no badge has ever stopped a war.
- ThomasHobbes
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
Being a vegetarian neither makes any difference to any of their concerns, but worst still it does not even address those problems.Eduk wrote: ↑May 15th, 2018, 4:06 am Just as an aside.
If you are a vegetarian or a vegan because of ethical considerations, be they environmental or cruelty concerns (or both). Is being a vegetarian going to make any difference to any of your concerns?
Now I'm not saying that if it won't make a difference you shouldn't bother (that's a whole different conversation) I just wonder if being a vegetarian/vegan is actually addressing your goals?
As an example. In the UK it was popular to wear a badge with something like 'no wars' written on it. To me that felt worse than pointless because it should be a given and, to my knowledge, no badge has ever stopped a war.
In my own direct environment, the idea that we would not have sheep on the land would mean the further destruction of the land by modern ploughing methods that have destroyed the soil and made any productivity wholly dependant on the chemical industry.
By contrast sheep farming provides soil enrichment, wool and great protein and essential fats without the chemicals.
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
Some of the most dynamic progress is being made by Israel and Japan, along with the US. China's very large population has been getting by for millennia on less protein and calcium than it really needs, and is beginning to address the problem https://futurism.com/china-signed-a-300 ... th-israel/ and its government has the capability to address it effectively on a national scale. Africans are not exactly overfed, either. Most of South Americ's beef is exported, so the local people can't afford it. I very much doubt any of those people will turn their noses up at a cheap, nutritious, accessible alternative. India's very large population has existed and multiplied, for millennia, on little or no meat. I have no idea how idea how modern Hindus regard, or will regard, the artificial version.
10-15 years. In spite of backlash from the meat industry. Sooner, if there is an outbreak of BSE or trichinosis rash of shipment of spoiled canned tuna. This fledgling industry has a lot of money invested already https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/23/bill-ga ... artup.htmlHow long do you think it will take for cultured meat to fully penetrate the markets of our own countries
The halls of power notoriously shift with public opinion and private sponsorship.
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
My concern or the situation? They're two different things.
My personal moral requirement is certainly addressed - if not wholly satisfied - by the choices I make.
The situation is addressed to a much smaller extent.
Does you vote make any difference to an election result? Of course not! And yet the concept of democracy is based on the cumulative effect of those inconsequential votes. And the food economy is affected by the choices of that minority - at least to the extent of wide availability of almond and soy products, and specified options on restaurant menus. We may not be many, but are here and the market takes notice.
Beyond that, of course, there are charities, educational outlets and political activities in which one may participate to have more influence.
That depends on your goal. For some people, a change to vegan diet is aimed at preventing, or mitigating heart disease. For some it's a conscientious objection. No, it won't stop the war, but at least I won't kill anyone. No I can't stop my government attacking Viet Nam, but I can let it know that I'm not supporting its decision to do so. The buttons don't stop wars; all they do is communicate my position to other citizens - and if the buttons grow enough voices and feet, they just might intimidate a government into ending that war.I just wonder if being a vegetarian/vegan is actually addressing your goals?
Of course, nobody counts. Everybody counts. It all depends on the count.
- NasloxiehRorsxez
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 11
- Joined: March 28th, 2018, 9:21 pm
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
Alias wrote: ↑May 11th, 2018, 6:38 pmRegardless of demand?NasloxiehRorsxez wrote: ↑May 11th, 2018, 5:19 pm Well, does abstaining from animal products actually save any animals in the process? Or is it just to clear one's conscience? If that's only the case, then it seems rather pointless. Since your moral actions change nothing, and the same amount of animals will be supplied regardless.
It doesn't sell, so you don't make any profit, so you keep breeding, raising, shipping, butchering, packing and refrigerating?
I don't think that's how the market operates.
I was speaking more individually, Is it possible for an individual to advocate veganism while consuming meat without being ethically inconsistent?
Your latest post addresses that I think.
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
Of course not. But that never stopped a hypocrite. Good Christians and the death penalty. Drain the swamp...NasloxiehRorsxez wrote: ↑May 15th, 2018, 2:34 pm I was speaking more individually, Is it possible for an individual to advocate veganism while consuming meat without being ethically inconsistent?
The trick is not to confuse what people do with what they say.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7932
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
Well, not really. This thread has uncovered many nuances and facets of this broad tppic. It is completely logical for an individual to change to eating free range chicken out of concern about factory farming, and support those who choose to be vegan.Alias wrote: ↑May 15th, 2018, 6:18 pmOf course not. But that never stopped a hypocrite. Good Christians and the death penalty. Drain the swamp...NasloxiehRorsxez wrote: ↑May 15th, 2018, 2:34 pm I was speaking more individually, Is it possible for an individual to advocate veganism while consuming meat without being ethically inconsistent?
The trick is not to confuse what people do with what they say.
-
- Posts: 284
- Joined: November 6th, 2016, 10:33 am
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
Fair enough. If what you say is true, then the value placed on a human life as food in Papua New Guinea is, or was, actually the same as its value to the person whose life it is (or was). In that situation the moral calculus supports cannibalism (or at least does not rule it out). However, if a cannibal family were to move in next door to me here in the UK, I would feel justified in using my argument against them if they started looking at me and licking their lips. I would suggest they go to Tesco instead, and buy a nice vegetarian meal.-1- wrote: ↑May 14th, 2018, 9:08 pmWhile I appreciate your devotion, the cannibal could not get another meal with protein. In Papua-New Guinea where cannibalism is rampant, or used to be, there were no domesticated animals, and there were no large hunted game. This is an island, a large island, mind you, but an island nevertheless. Larger mammals could not survive on it, because the herbavores would probably graze the land to a desert. So they probably did, they died out for lack of food, the vegetation regenerated, then humans came form the east, and bang, they only meat to eat inland were each other.CIN wrote: ↑May 14th, 2018, 7:00 pm If a cannibal wanted to eat me, rather than eating a vegetarian meal, I would suggest to him that the value he places on me as food could not possibly attain the value I place on my life for myself. He can get another meal; I can't get another life.
If animals could reason, they would presumably argue exactly as I have just done.
This is why I am vegetarian.
Dredging up memories from the vegan course I attended in the 1980s, I believe healthy humans can get the protein they need by combining plant foods from different groups (e.g. grains and pulses) at the same meal. It's all about combining different amino acids. But don't quote me, I'm very rusty about vegan nutrition. Anyone who wants to know that stuff should do their own research. (Though this is not easy. There are a lot of people on the internet who have big axes to grind in this area.)
- -1-
- Posts: 878
- Joined: December 1st, 2016, 2:23 am
Re: Animal Ethics - Is it wrong to eat animals?
What I said must be true, because I read it on the Internet.CIN wrote: ↑May 16th, 2018, 4:21 amFair enough. If what you say is true, then the value placed on a human life as food in Papua New Guinea is, or was, actually the same as its value to the person whose life it is (or was). In that situation the moral calculus supports cannibalism (or at least does not rule it out). However, if a cannibal family were to move in next door to me here in the UK, I would feel justified in using my argument against them if they started looking at me and licking their lips. I would suggest they go to Tesco instead, and buy a nice vegetarian meal.-1- wrote: ↑May 14th, 2018, 9:08 pm
While I appreciate your devotion, the cannibal could not get another meal with protein. In Papua-New Guinea where cannibalism is rampant, or used to be, there were no domesticated animals, and there were no large hunted game. This is an island, a large island, mind you, but an island nevertheless. Larger mammals could not survive on it, because the herbavores would probably graze the land to a desert. So they probably did, they died out for lack of food, the vegetation regenerated, then humans came form the east, and bang, they only meat to eat inland were each other.
I would buy your second argument, about the Kannibals moving in next door, if you said Texas, Germany, Australia, or Gruzia. But the UK???? That country is thiiiiis close to take on the practice of cannabis due to the same considerations as Papua-New Guinea.
One more tidbit of info: when we had the mad cow disease outbreaks, they, whoever they are, realized it's due to species eating protein matter of their own species. Like feeding leftover raw hamburger meat to Giraffes. (I'm talking about Giraffe hamburgers. Are there any other kind?) So a bunch of scientists or propagandists flew to Papua-New Guinea and asked the locals to stop eating human flesh, and gave them the reasons.
You know what happened... no, they did not eat the envoys. Instead, the Papuans said, "okay", and stopped the practice of Cannabis. Or cannibalis. You see, they are humans, too, with human intelligence, and understand reason.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023