Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Discuss morality and ethics in this message board.
Featured Article: Philosophical Analysis of Abortion, The Right to Life, and Murder
XavierAlex
Posts: 307
Joined: June 4th, 2012, 10:56 am

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by XavierAlex »

The OP, I daresay, is oversimplifying terms, such as morality and amorality, and many historical and cultural events and occurrences. While I totally agree in the attempt in clarity of thought, action, and deed, over sweepingly condemning something as good or evil, good or bad, or right or wrong. I won't tread into any argument that tries to prove in a universal moral code.

However simply wiping away morality as some by-product of religion, or as some semantic miscommunication, grossly neglects great traditions that eventually must make a judgment call. Perhaps this "article" is just for people who don't at all think about values and morality and claim that their judgments are right all the time. If one were to depend solely on valueless statements and descriptors to communicate codes of conduct, that would be the opposite of clarity altogether. The reason I think this is unclear on all levels is because secularism and moral relativism by nature do not clarify judgments made by others. Essentially it's like having an onion in the court room, and as the trial commences and questions asked, the onion unpeels to an empty center.

If this is purely a semantic issue and clarity, which is clearer in this example?

1. An umpire calls "Out!" The replay shows three strikes.

2. Or: the umpire stands before the microphone and says: "Well, the first pitch was slightly low. The first swing missed. The second pitch, the ball had a slight curve, along with the wind, and the speed seemed swift, therefore the ball is a strike, and that means, in the score so far the ball has passed over the plate twice. This means two strikes. In the game of baseball, upon three times the ball passes the home plate, without having been hit as a foul, it is what is known as 'Out'. Finally the ball has passed three times and therefore the batter missed, is out, and must go back to his bench and wait."

While I understand the article's point that in many cases people are unthinking of their words in general and use vague statements such as: "Morality comes from religion".

Those ancient societies truly were misinformed and simpletons, unlike today's world where we know so much more about things like amorality. They just saw a sun and said--Gawd. There's a tree--that must be a Gawd.

This "Clarity of Amorality" is negligent of major and minor cultural exchanges and assumes that any time the words, good, bad, evil, right, wrong, have no definition whatsoever and that a more secular or legal way of saying things is somehow better, which is biased and misleading. The only clear thing I think about it is that the title is an oxymoron.
User avatar
Trollinginger
Posts: 9
Joined: March 19th, 2014, 3:21 pm

Prescriptive vs. Descriptive

Post by Trollinginger »

The first article suggest that descriptive arguments that are aside from morality should be the only route. I disagree, because I think prescriptive moral definitions are coherent and useful. Descriptive theories are designed to point out a morality that already exists inherently within humanity, whereas prescriptive definitions do not suggest and inherent morality, but rather a defining method by which people can determine what should and should not be done based upon an established good.

I absolutely agree that there is ambiguity in descriptive theories, there is plenty of opportunity for clarity within prescriptive definitions, as that is what they are: definitions. A way to determine what is right and wrong based upon a given universal good.

I recently submitted my possible prescriptive definition of morality, and this post came shortly after. I can't help but wonder if my submission was rejected along the lines of the article's premise?
Rombomb
Posts: 1294
Joined: February 24th, 2013, 12:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Rombomb »

Scott,

I'm kinda confused by your point. So either you're confused, or I'm wrong (, or we're both wrong).

Are you against the idea of people making moral judgements about other people's ideas/actions? (that's what I think your point is, so correct me if I'm wrong.)

If I'm right, then you are making a moral judgment that people who make moral judgements about other people are doing something they shouldn't be doing.

If I've misunderstood you, could you clarify what you are suggesting to people?
We are all fallible -- anyone of us can be wrong about any one of our ideas. So shielding any one of my ideas from criticism means irrationally believing that I have the truth.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Steve3007 »

I don't think Scott has to be regarded as contradicting himself by making a moral judgement here. He could argue that he is simply making a recommendation, on the grounds of utility, that people should substitute recommendations (on the grounds of utility) in place of moral statements.

But, I think statements using the language of morality are still useful, simply as a shorthand for what could otherwise be a long-winded discussion of the subtle interplay of cause and effect and complex interwoven reasons, both short and long term, as to why a given course of action is judged to be more beneficial than another. In fact, I would say that is possibly a more accurate explanation of the origin of moral statements in the first place. They are (at their best) the culmination of years of collected wisdom and experience.

This is particularly apparent to me when discussing with my children what courses of action they should and should not take.
Rombomb
Posts: 1294
Joined: February 24th, 2013, 12:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Rombomb »

Steve3007 wrote:I don't think Scott has to be regarded as contradicting himself by making a moral judgement here. He could argue that he is simply making a recommendation,
How is a recommendation (to do something) not a moral judgement?

As far as I can tell, a recommendation looks like this: Moral idea B is better than moral idea A (for specific context P) for reasons X, Y, and Z. Do you agree?
We are all fallible -- anyone of us can be wrong about any one of our ideas. So shielding any one of my ideas from criticism means irrationally believing that I have the truth.
Wayne92587
Posts: 1780
Joined: January 27th, 2012, 9:32 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Hermese Trismegistus

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Wayne92587 »

Moral Law does not exist as suggestion, a recommendation;

Moral Law is do it this way or else, you have no Choice.

-- Updated April 3rd, 2014, 9:43 am to add the following --

Moral Law is," do it the way the Pharaoh tells you to do it or the Pharaoh will kick your ****".

-- Updated April 3rd, 2014, 9:51 am to add the following --

Historical Moral judgments are base upon the gleaning of Judgments born of Rationalizations, the Knowledge of Reality that has not been, can not be, will never be Experienced.
Rombomb
Posts: 1294
Joined: February 24th, 2013, 12:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Rombomb »

Wayne92587 wrote:Moral Law does not exist as suggestion, a recommendation;

Moral Law is do it this way or else, you have no Choice.

Moral Law is," do it the way the Pharaoh tells you to do it or the Pharaoh will kick your ****".
Was the OP about moral law or about morality?

If the moral thing for me to do, right now, is to reply to you -- in the sense that replying to you is better (for me) than compared to, say, watching tv instead -- who is going to make me do it? No one, except for me. I choose to act. No one else can choose for me.
We are all fallible -- anyone of us can be wrong about any one of our ideas. So shielding any one of my ideas from criticism means irrationally believing that I have the truth.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Steve3007 »

Rombomb:
How is a recommendation (to do something) not a moral judgement?
Because it's a statement of the form: "If you wish for this outcome then I predict the best course of action is this". Not a statement of what's wrong or right but of what, given a knowledge of cause and effect, would be most effective in achieving what I perceive to be your goals.
As far as I can tell, a recommendation looks like this: Moral idea B is better than moral idea A (for specific context P) for reasons X, Y, and Z. Do you agree?
I'd say it's more like: "Action A is likely to result in outcome X. Action B is likely to result in outcome Y. I believe, from past experience of you and other people, that you would prefer outcome X. Therefore I recommend action A, captain."

At least, that's how I think Scott was using the word. As I said, though, I don't agree with Scott's rejection of the use of moral language and the concepts of morality.
Rombomb
Posts: 1294
Joined: February 24th, 2013, 12:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Rombomb »

Steve3007 wrote:Rombomb:
How is a recommendation (to do something) not a moral judgement?
Because it's a statement of the form: "If you wish for this outcome then I predict the best course of action is this". Not a statement of what's wrong or right but of what, given a knowledge of cause and effect, would be most effective in achieving what I perceive to be your goals.
Let's examine that: "If you wish for this outcome [described as X, Y, and Z] then I predict the best course of action [as compared to action A] is this ".

So as far as I can tell, that's the same as what I said.
We are all fallible -- anyone of us can be wrong about any one of our ideas. So shielding any one of my ideas from criticism means irrationally believing that I have the truth.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Steve3007 »

But you introduced them as "moral ideas". i.e. ideas about what is morally right or wrong. My point was that they could be seen as simply the evaluation of amoral consequences.
Rombomb
Posts: 1294
Joined: February 24th, 2013, 12:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Rombomb »

Steve3007 wrote:But you introduced them as "moral ideas". i.e. ideas about what is morally right or wrong. My point was that they could be seen as simply the evaluation of amoral consequences.
What's an amoral consequence?

If you want to solve problem Y, and your idea for solving it is (moral) idea A, and if I show how your idea A fails to solve problem Y while idea B *does* solve it (and which you agreed), then you should act on idea B not A. Do you agree?

Ideas A and B are moral ideas. I don't know what you mean by amoral consequences.
We are all fallible -- anyone of us can be wrong about any one of our ideas. So shielding any one of my ideas from criticism means irrationally believing that I have the truth.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Steve3007 »

Mmm. I'm not sure what I meant by that either! I think I should have said "amoral evaluation of consequences" or something. Bad wording.

Do you not make a distinction between amoral advice as to the best course of action and moral advice?

Would you characterize the statement: "you shouldn't go outside without an umbrella if you don't want to get wet." as having any moral content? I think the OP was recommending that "moral" statements should be replaced with statements like this.
Rombomb
Posts: 1294
Joined: February 24th, 2013, 12:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Rombomb »

Steve3007 wrote:Mmm. I'm not sure what I meant by that either! I think I should have said "amoral evaluation of consequences" or something. Bad wording.

Do you not make a distinction between amoral advice as to the best course of action and moral advice?

Would you characterize the statement: "you shouldn't go outside without an umbrella if you don't want to get wet." as having any moral content? I think the OP was recommending that "moral" statements should be replaced with statements like this.
That is morality. One *should* do X (use umbrella) in order to solve problem Y (wanting to stay dry).

If he instead wanted to get wet, then he *should not* do X.

-- Updated April 3rd, 2014, 1:40 pm to add the following --

Note that there are immoral problems too.

An example of an immoral/evil problem is this: You want the whole world to obey Allahs laws instead of human laws (under threat of violence).
We are all fallible -- anyone of us can be wrong about any one of our ideas. So shielding any one of my ideas from criticism means irrationally believing that I have the truth.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Steve3007 »

That is morality. One *should* do X (use umbrella) in order to solve problem Y (wanting to stay dry).

If he instead wanted to get wet, then he *should not* do X.
So you'd see that as a moral question just because it's possible to use the word "should" in its wording? That seems odd to me. It suggests that pretty much every problem could be seen as a moral one.
Rombomb
Posts: 1294
Joined: February 24th, 2013, 12:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Article: The Clarity Of Amorality

Post by Rombomb »

Steve3007 wrote:
That is morality. One *should* do X (use umbrella) in order to solve problem Y (wanting to stay dry).

If he instead wanted to get wet, then he *should not* do X.
So you'd see that as a moral question just because it's possible to use the word "should" in its wording? That seems odd to me. It suggests that pretty much every problem could be seen as a moral one.
No. It's moral because there is a *human action* involved.
We are all fallible -- anyone of us can be wrong about any one of our ideas. So shielding any one of my ideas from criticism means irrationally believing that I have the truth.
Post Reply

Return to “Ethics and Morality”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021