Live as a coward or die as a hero?
-
- Posts: 597
- Joined: September 5th, 2007, 4:25 am
- Contact:
There are statues to Churchill.
Ergo, there are statues to cowards.
Now take that stick out of your **** and stop mythologising people. They sun didn't shine out of their arses, they weren't 'heroes' to anyone who properly knew them. They worried, they lied, they shat and sweated and cocked up and flinched and fudged. Just like everyone else.
It's what makes people beautiful. Variety, contradiction, contrast. Where the ape meets the angel. It's great.
You, though. You'd rather turn them into plastic fairytale princesses and stone-etched manly paragons of virtue. How dull. How un-human. How fake. How fantasist.
- Juice
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: May 8th, 2009, 10:24 pm
It appears that celebrating the accomplishments of others and expecting a standard of honor in a world which is as diverse as it is and providing inspiration by means of exemplifying the human condition at its best is what makes people beautiful, and fosters variety, contradiction and contrast not the mundane processes of life you seem to extol as virtue.
Is it your contention one should aspire to mediocrity by enshrining those functions normal to every individual or are you one of those that believes man is driven to equality and equilibrium?
As mundane a life as Ann Frank desired to lead while her circumstance tragic her thoughts and beliefs inspire the beauty of a heroic and brave life and is celebrated, remembered and memorialized as such today.
Is the angel of the apes Dianne Fossey of the same character as those whom she virtuously and heroically fought against while still performing the same mundane life functions you expose not worthy of a monument to excellence of sacrifice and commitment?
Men and women strive towards excellence for self, community, society and humanity. For this they are immortalized by the reminder in memory and like character in art, history and life.
What is confusing is your willingness to debase anyone who has inspired no matter the degree. So in order to allow at least that little inspiration you crave I will tell you that anyone who is cowardly is a waste of a human respiratory system when they don't even have the humanity or sense of purpose by their own hubris to recognize that there are those who are better at some things than others. And those that are better deserve whatever monuments and distinction accorded no matter what is stuck up their "****". Especially when one considers it his sole obligation to put it there.
An explanation of cause is not a justification by reason.
C. S. Lewis
Fight the illusion!
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: March 13th, 2010, 9:40 am
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: February 3rd, 2011, 5:30 am
Re: Live as a coward or die as a hero?
It's a noble thought, and I'd like to think I would do that too, but how do we know what we'll do until the time comes? I don't think we do.Scott wrote:For example, if I saw an innocent 3-year-old girl playing in the street about to be hit by a car, and for the sake of simplicity let's say I know that either I have to let her die or kill myself to save her, of course I would choose to save her. Who wouldn't?
Who wouldn't? Many, I suspect. If one accepts the premise that there are things worth dying for, then I suppose there are lesser things one could die for than to save the life of an innocent, but I suspect not everyone accepts that premise.
I think it's okay to ask ourselves these kinds of questions, but I don't think real life very often presents itself in the manner of the hypothetical scenarios we conjure up.
- PaulNZ
- Posts: 595
- Joined: January 27th, 2011, 3:56 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Marcus Aurelius
Is a suicide bomber a hero for his cause or a coward for his acts?"
I would say that the perception of the suicide bomber would be that he will be a hero in his own mind (or martyr) should he succeed in his goal. His motive would have to be such that he could overcome the fear of death and his instinct to survive, and religious martyrdom might be a sufficient motive to do that for the "suicide bomber".
It goes without saying that those on the receiving end would hold a vastly different perception of the same event and of the bomber!
Some variants might influence perception however, such as was it a military target or a soft civilian target? Commonly held religious views, the perception of joint suffering, a common understanding of a perceived necessary sacrifice for a bigger goal etc.
- Mark
- Posts: 781
- Joined: September 21st, 2010, 10:56 am
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 830
- Joined: October 28th, 2007, 1:45 pm
- Location: California
Existence wrote:I have a question.
Is a suicide bomber a hero for his cause or a coward for his acts?
One of the many definitions of "hero" is someone who performs a noble act despite his fear. Therefore, I suggest we substitute another term for "coward". The term "villain" might be a better antonym. Thus, the question bcomes "Is a suicide bomber a hero for his cause or a villain for his acts?"
The question gets us into the moral morass of consequentialism -- whether the ends justify the means. The trouble with those kinds of questions is not that they don't have an answer. I think they do. The trouble is there's no one around who knows enough and is objective enough to judge the matter and determine the best course.
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: January 27th, 2011, 1:01 am
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 830
- Joined: October 28th, 2007, 1:45 pm
- Location: California
Existence wrote:Perception is subjective making the words "Hero and Coward" meaningless in regard to a universal understanding, but rather left to be defined by a persons cultural norms.
I don't think individuals have cultural norms. Groups do. In this case the group appears to have two conflicting norms. Isn't that just an illusion? I read about the Fundamental Attribution Error. It's the tendency to view the behavior of others as a trait rather than as a factor influencd by situational variables. Cultural norms usually help a group to live together. I don't see any relief in that direction for this problem..
I not all that sure I'm right about this matter. Criticism is welcome.
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: January 27th, 2011, 1:01 am
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: September 9th, 2011, 7:08 pm
Re: Live as a coward or die as a hero?
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: August 18th, 2010, 12:58 pm
Re: Live as a coward or die as a hero?
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: September 13th, 2010, 11:35 am
Re: Live as a coward or die as a hero?
When people do a heroic action then they see that they choosed to sacrifice themselves.Before they didn't know it and they weren't aware of their sacrifice.This is why some see their heroic actions or see their cowardiness without have known before that they would act like this.Life lets you know.And this is why I think that people are not brave or coward when things refer to death but only when things matter life (being brave or coward in you daily actions towards anything and eveyone in life).But that's different.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023