Welcome to the Philosophy Forums! If you are not a member, please join the forums now. It's completely free! If you are a member, please log in.

The Superior and Inferior

Discuss morality and ethics in this message board.
Featured Article: Philosophical Analysis of Abortion, The Right to Life, and Murder
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

MatthewBissonnette

  • Posts: 1
    ( View: All / In topic )

  • Joined: May 12th, 2012, 9:35 am

The Superior and Inferior

Post Number:#1  PostMay 12th, 2012, 9:36 am

The Inferior and Superior a philosophical thesis by Matthew Bissonnette








Since the beginning of recorded human history has been a tendency for societies to divide its own populace by certain divisional lines; these can be either religious, economic or racial. The one constant of all these systems of division is the belief in the inherent superiority of one class and the inherent inferiority of another. Most religions are based upon the concept that those who fervently devote themselves to that faith or moral and thus any actions they commit themselves too are justified to matter how ethically unsound any such actions are; while those who may oppose or not conform to such a supposedly spiritual institution are thus vilified a believe to be inherently evil and thus their destruction becomes an acceptable thing. Many societies divided themselves by economic lines and an example would be the Roman Republic, a nation state where a small wealthy elite held on to all political power and luxury of the commoners labor and where 95 percent of the population lived beneath the poverty line; though the Republic was democratic most historians readily agree that elections where always rigged in favor of the wealthy. Some societies have chosen to divide themselves by racial class systems where one ethnicity proclaims itself as a superior and other is relegated to an inferior status and are deprived of dignity. But the creation of these sometimes oppositional class systems is that it creates instability within societies which can sometimes lead to oppression and in the worse case outright genocide. So why are these systems of division still employed by many nations today? Experiments in human psychology have shown that if a group of individuals is made to believe that half of them are superior and the other half are inferior it will quickly change the disposition of such people; those who are self assured in their superiority will quickly become arrogant, condescending and cruel. Such studies have shown that those who are made to believe they are by nature inferior grapple with feelings of depression, anger, and powerlessness. It is a well understood principle of human nature that at a young age the human mind forms; thus experiences encountered by individuals at those ages go a long way to informing the person they will be for the rest of their life. In other words, if in youth you come to believe in your own superiority they you will believe it for the rest of your life; while those who are made to believe in their own inferiority will feel worthless for the rest of their lives. So such divisions of superiority and inferiority amongst societies must be engrained in such societies citizens at a young age in most cases for it to become a reality. If it is true that both currently and historically, those who have held onto power in entire societies have chosen to divide its own people; then for what reasons? Though using such a tragic and morbid episode of man's inhumanity to his fellow man may be in poor taste, let us take a look at Nazi Germany. Though the reason's for the National Socialist Parties eventual seizure of absolute power in 1930's Germany are far to numerous to be covered here; a key ideological underpinning of Nazism was the belief in a superior and inferior class or the so called superman and subhuman. Propaganda created by the Third Reich which became pervasive in Germany leading up to World War 2 created the belief that Nordic people where of a genetically superior race or the so called superhuman. Other propaganda created the belief that groups such as the mentally ill, gypsies, people of the Jewish faith and Slavs where born inferior and by the Third Reich's own words where thus unworthy of life. The creation of this narcissistic system of division may have made it possible for men and women to take part in the own right genocide of countless men, women and children when such actions would not have even been considered by them before such beliefs where enforced. This system of division historically has influenced people who might have once been ethical into doing things which are highly destructive. That this recurring tendency of human societies to created such divisional class systems is that it will tend to ignite conflict; and where those who proclaim themselves as superior are in a position of strength are prone to engage in the worst manifestations of human barbarism since they fear no possible or significant retaliation. Could these class systems be created so that those who are indoctrinated into the superior class system are bound for life to those responsible for their perceived sense of superiority; and to oppose such practices will only have you relegated to the class of the inferior? But I argue that these divisional lines are philosophical constructs with no truth in abject reality. It is a form of psychological manipulation to create the ability to make individuals who will fervently serve even the most tyrannical systems of control just so they may cling to their artificially created sense of superiority. It creates a simplistic view of societies where social groups are not individuals molded by numerous and complex factors; but become generic and stereotypical where all members of these groups are bereft of any kind of distinct character. It creates a rigid system where the superior is usually above suspicion no matter how unethical and corrupt they may be while the inferior is by nature inherently suspect even though if a member of this class is a ethical law abiding person. Perhaps an individual should be discriminated against for their actions as an individual; they should not be vilified for characteristics about themselves that they no control over. But such systems of division are a necessity for a majority of tyrannical societies, oppressive practices and human exploitation. I will finish with that such practices while not only destructive are a threat to the survival to of our entire species since the technology of mass destruction becomes more readily available as more nations industrialize. This tendency to create antagonistic divisional systems of superiority and inferiority is a powder keg which if it goes of will render practically all life on Earth extinct. The only reason this system of division still exists is those those who create and maintain it are themselves driven by the belief in their own superiority over others. Such beliefs must be abandoned for it will surely result in the demise of humanity. Think about it.

Did you know?

  • Once you join the forums and log in you will get to enjoy an ad-reduced experience. It's easy and completely free!

Offline

Gamnot

  • Posts: 88
    ( View: All / In topic )

  • Joined: March 15th, 2012, 2:10 am

Re: The Superior and Inferior

Post Number:#2  PostMay 12th, 2012, 11:19 am

Martin Luther King, Jr. stated the proposition that: "A person should not be judged by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character." I would qualify that statement with: "A person should be judged by his character and competence rather than for the color of his or her skin, the person's gender, the person's national origin, the person's nationality, etc. A person with character, but without competence; the ability to understand his or her circumstances and the ability and the will to make productive contributions to his or her society is impotent. The person with competence understood to be the ability to use manipulative and exploitative power to gain his or her own ends is destructive. I believe that we in the United States are living in a dangerous time because of the various factors such as the erosion of the middle class, the culture of narcissism, the national debt, the savings deficient, the trade deficient, etc. that is causing the creation of two classes: the rich and the rest of us.

The Philosopher-Psychologist H.A. Overstreet whose primary focus was the "Maturity Concept" said: "Human progress is measured by the reduction of the over-under kind of relatedness" which is what you were talking about, but the means of obtaining that objective is seemingly impossible since human being differ so much in abilities.

-- Updated May 12th, 2012, 11:49 am to add the following --

An example of what I am taking about: There are many "Working poor" in the United States who make productive contributions to society, but cannot get out of their debt slavery condition, while on the other hand there are people who use sex in an exploitative way to become wealthy; The pornographers who in a sense satisfy basic human needs, but they also create other needs and these activities are both a cause and effect of interpersonal and social estrangement. At best they are doing nothing productive and at worst they are destructive. The pornographers are able to rise to wealth as well as social power and influence.
Offline
User avatar

Scott

Site Admin

  • Posts: 3254
    ( View: All / In topic )

  • Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
  • Favorite Philosopher: Diogenes the Cynic

Re: The Superior and Inferior

Post Number:#3  PostMay 12th, 2012, 4:54 pm

Interesting posts!

Do these arbitrary illusions of superiority and inferiority cause the classism which broadly can include specific economic or state-supported arbitrary discrimination resulting in inequality such as racism and sexism or does the classism cause the illusionary feelings of superiority and inferiority namely as a way for the upper class to rationalize their guilt and other ambivalence regarding being upper class?
Online Philosophy Club - Please tell me how to improve this website!

Check it out: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?
Offline

Gamnot

  • Posts: 88
    ( View: All / In topic )

  • Joined: March 15th, 2012, 2:10 am

Re: The Superior and Inferior

Post Number:#4  PostMay 12th, 2012, 7:22 pm

In our time, we are living in the "culture of narcissism" that was predicted by Max Weber before his death about 1920. The characteristics of the narcissistic personality are: A sense of entitlement and bad boundaries among other factors. Having a sense of entitlement based on such things as gender and ideology is a cause of bad boundaries. and vice versa, having bad boundaries would create the need for narcissistic individuals to maintain their sense of entitlement for defensive purposes. Another characteristic of the narcissistic personality is magical thinking which is used to rationalize their behavior.

I tend to think that there is always a certain amount of what could be called: "The will to hubris" lurking in any society waiting for the opportunity to rise up in self-aggrandizement. The ordeal of change that we have been experiencing in our time opens up those opportunities for those types of narcissistic individuals.

-- Updated May 12th, 2012, 9:13 pm to add the following --

The phenomena can be looked at through the psychologist Raymond Cattell's Q2 personality factor as well. We all are somewhere on the group-adherence and self-sufficiency continuum line. Things go well when we have healthy group adherence, but at some point group-adherence becomes cultic and a lot of cults have been forming in our time. There are different reasons why people become overly attracted to a person-idea complex, the primary one is probably estrangement. There is usually a strong touch-stone proposition that attracts people together and creates a kind of bonding that they have a need for and cannot obtain from elsewhere. I am reminded of Dostoevsky's novel: "The Devils" and how the individuals bonded together through using violence against others.

I am sure that "guilt and expiation" is also a factor. The projecting of quilt on an out-group and the scapegoating of that out-group.

Return to Ethics and Morality

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Philosophy Book of the Month Updates

The January book of the month is Two Cheers for Anarchism by James C. Scott. Discuss it here or buy it here.

The November book of the month is On the Internet by Hubert L. Dreyfus. Pick it up, read it and discuss it with us as a group!