Eating Animals

Discuss morality and ethics in this message board.
Featured Article: Philosophical Analysis of Abortion, The Right to Life, and Murder
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Eating Animals

Post by LuckyR »

Greta wrote:
LuckyR wrote: (Nested quote removed.)


If ranchers had to pay for the damage that their livestock created then beef and lamb would be a lot more expensive. Which would be a good thing. That would drive down (but not eliminate) consumption. Sort of like the idea that while a Prius may be better for the environment, Ferraris should not be illegal. They don't need to be. They are prohibitively expensive so their impact on the environment is negligible.
Pricing that truly reflects the cost of things, without hidden costs transferred to the broader community would be the kind of practical answer Spiral asked about. Powerful vested interests, however, may not be enthusiastic about the concept.
Of course not. No one protests more about public assistance for others than those who are adept at dodging their own responsibilities.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Eating Animals

Post by Sy Borg »

LuckyR wrote:
Greta wrote: (Nested quote removed.)

Pricing that truly reflects the cost of things, without hidden costs transferred to the broader community would be the kind of practical answer Spiral asked about. Powerful vested interests, however, may not be enthusiastic about the concept.
Of course not. No one protests more about public assistance for others than those who are adept at dodging their own responsibilities.
Which brings us back to the observation of Spiral (et al) that might is right. Justice appears ever more to just be a happy fluke rather than an imperative.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Eating Animals

Post by LuckyR »

Greta wrote:
LuckyR wrote: (Nested quote removed.)


Of course not. No one protests more about public assistance for others than those who are adept at dodging their own responsibilities.
Which brings us back to the observation of Spiral (et al) that might is right. Justice appears ever more to just be a happy fluke rather than an imperative.
Justice implies impartiality. Impartiality requires the ability to judge against one's own interest, if required. This is an uncommon trait, though not an impossible one. Perhaps more frequent than pure chance (since it used to be held in high regard and children were taught to try to emulate it) but getting less common all of the time. I blame the Internet.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Eating Animals

Post by Sy Borg »

LuckyR wrote:
Greta wrote: (Nested quote removed.)

Which brings us back to the observation of Spiral (et al) that might is right. Justice appears ever more to just be a happy fluke rather than an imperative.
Justice implies impartiality. Impartiality requires the ability to judge against one's own interest, if required. This is an uncommon trait, though not an impossible one. Perhaps more frequent than pure chance (since it used to be held in high regard and children were taught to try to emulate it) but getting less common all of the time. I blame the Internet.
:lol: I'll blame population.

Pertinent point about working against one's own interests. It does appear that today's populace is far from uniformly interested in sacrificing their lifestyles today for the sake of our children and grandchildren.
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Eating Animals

Post by Spiral Out »

Let's say we eliminate the mass-production meat industry and nobody eats meat anymore. What is the proposed new food source that will meet the nutritional needs of the entire planet?
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Eating Animals

Post by Sy Borg »

Spiral Out wrote:Let's say we eliminate the mass-production meat industry and nobody eats meat anymore. What is the proposed new food source that will meet the nutritional needs of the entire planet?
No need to go that far. How about people tend more towards eating a healthy quantity of meat? If meat prices truly reflected the costs to the entire community of the meat industry, then perhaps that would happen.
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Eating Animals

Post by Spiral Out »

Greta wrote:
Spiral Out wrote:Let's say we eliminate the mass-production meat industry and nobody eats meat anymore. What is the proposed new food source that will meet the nutritional needs of the entire planet?
No need to go that far. How about people tend more towards eating a healthy quantity of meat? If meat prices truly reflected the costs to the entire community of the meat industry, then perhaps that would happen.
Well now we're getting into very subjective judgements indeed. How much is a "healthy quantity of meat", and for whom is it healthy? How do you imagine the meat industry to change with people eating a "healthy quantity of meat"?
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Eating Animals

Post by Felix »

Greta just addressed that question, Spiral Out. She said: "How about people tend more towards eating a healthy quantity of meat? If meat prices truly reflected the costs to the entire community of the meat industry, then perhaps that would happen."

As I said on my post #718: " Eliminate the billions of dollars of government subsidies given to the meat industry (fruit and vegetable crops are not subsidized) and see how economically feasible they are then. See: https://goo.gl/pSgTMs "
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Eating Animals

Post by Sy Borg »

Spiral Out wrote:How much is a "healthy quantity of meat" ...?
Generally, an amount and type that won't significantly increase the risk of bowel cancer.
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Eating Animals

Post by Spiral Out »

Greta wrote:
Spiral Out wrote:How much is a "healthy quantity of meat" ...?
Generally, an amount and type that won't significantly increase the risk of bowel cancer.
That's not an answer, that's a dodge, and it proves my point quite well. You'll have to leave the judgement of what the "proper" amount (and type) of meat is up to the individual as it is yet just another subjective determination. That is, there is no scientific basis behind your suggestion. Therefore, it would have to be an all-or-nothing deal. So I'll ask again, what will the replacement food source be that will meet the nutritional needs of the entire planet?

I'm presuming the new meatless diet would necessarily have to be strictly plant-based, but then you'd run into the critical problems I'd outlined previously.
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Eating Animals

Post by LuckyR »

Moving from a greater to a lesser dependence of a less efficient calorie source (in production) will not require fancy technology to produce more calories for the planet, it will happen automatically.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
ThamiorTheThinker
Posts: 281
Joined: October 21st, 2015, 9:07 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Yoda

Re: Eating Animals

Post by ThamiorTheThinker »

My point, SpiralOut, was that large, powerful groups (like the Nazis) propagated and enforced intolerable acts like enslavement, genocide and eugenics. By your reasoning, since they were large, powerful groups, they needed no justification for their actions.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Eating Animals

Post by LuckyR »

ThamiorTheThinker wrote:My point, SpiralOut, was that large, powerful groups (like the Nazis) propagated and enforced intolerable acts like enslavement, genocide and eugenics. By your reasoning, since they were large, powerful groups, they needed no justification for their actions.
That depends on your use of the word "need". From a practical (and thus moral) standpoint large powerful groups can use that power as a de facto mandate to do whatever they please. From an ethical standpoint (what you are insinuating), you are correct, power does not apply.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
ThamiorTheThinker
Posts: 281
Joined: October 21st, 2015, 9:07 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Yoda

Re: Eating Animals

Post by ThamiorTheThinker »

And I was indeed talking about the ethical standpoint, LuckyR.

-- Updated January 14th, 2017, 9:12 pm to add the following --

What is able to be done is not what should be done, ethically speaking. SpiralOut was appealing to the idea that we are able to overpower, outsmart other organisms and the fact that we have a desire to in order to reach their conclusion that it's ethically PERMISSIBLE to kill and eat animals.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Eating Animals

Post by LuckyR »

ThamiorTheThinker wrote:And I was indeed talking about the ethical standpoint, LuckyR.

-- Updated January 14th, 2017, 9:12 pm to add the following --

What is able to be done is not what should be done, ethically speaking. SpiralOut was appealing to the idea that we are able to overpower, outsmart other organisms and the fact that we have a desire to in order to reach their conclusion that it's ethically PERMISSIBLE to kill and eat animals.
Spiral's logic is sound, though limited. It is ethically permissible to kill and eat animals. Having said that there are many nuances within the topic that will limit and/or supercede that general comment.
"As usual... it depends."
Post Reply

Return to “Ethics and Morality”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021