Religion is Darwinian
- Mlw
- Posts: 256
- Joined: July 23rd, 2010, 5:03 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Augustine of Hippo
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Religion is Darwinian
Without religion, neither the modern mind nor civilization could have emerged, because people would not have been socializable, unable to see the bigger picture. Religion is the bigger picture. Not everything is about one's personal life. Personality must take in the fresh air outside the narrow confines of the ego and its worldly obsessions with money, career, etc. Point is, if we don't have religion, then we will develop an unhealthy state of mind. This, in turn, will have detrimental effects on our worldly endeavour. So religion has increased the survival value among our species. Why we have religion can be explained from a Darwinian perspective, too.
Mats Winther | http://two-paths.com
- Mlw
- Posts: 256
- Joined: July 23rd, 2010, 5:03 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Augustine of Hippo
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Religion is Darwinian
A wealth of evidence suggests that religions forge solidarity and cooperation [...] Ritual performances emerge among even the most egalitarian foragers, and they appear to build solidarity and both broaden and tighten social ties [...] Recent research suggests that “overimitation” (i.e., the copying of causally opaque behaviors) may have been a crucial adaptation in the evolution both of language and of social norms (on the role of imitation for normative learning [...] Notably, where ritual actions are synchronized in groups, via collective dancing, singing, and marching, overimitation appears to stabilize norms, there being no better way of copying than the “proper” way modeled [...] [R]esearchers have looked to synchronous group behaviors as a basic ingredient of ritual-induced cooperation, conjecturing that synchrony “coevolved biologically and culturally to serve as a technology of social bonding” [...]
Durkheim surmises that it is both a physical and mental alignment during ritual performances that leads to a confounding of self and group; “swelling out” in McNeill’s terms. According to Durkheim, such cooperative motivations are more strongly expressed when partners share conceptions of the “sacred,” or “things set apart and forbidden” (Durkheim 1915/1965:44). On Durkheim’s model, then, it is a combination of shared body movements and sacred values that intensifies solidarity during religious ritual performances [...] Recent evidence suggests that rituals coordinate empathetic arousal among audiences and performers, at unfamiliar social scales, extending cooperative benefits beyond the circle of those who perform rituals [...] Dysphoric (painful or frightening) rituals have been observed to bolster solidarity among initiates [...]
In smaller-scale societies, groups are able to build local solidarity without appealing to moralizing heavenly agents (Gervais et al. 2011). In larger polities, however, moralizing gods appear to be effective in fostering cohesion across multitribal subunits [...] If larger societies (by hypothesis) benefit from larger gods, the kind of intergroup competition that leads to large-scale civilizations should, all things equal, select for “moralizing gods” [...]
Put simply, do moral judgments require beliefs in metaphysical “stuff” to make them true? Charles Taylor has long argued that moral judgments are inextricably linked to metaphysical claims, and that even supposedly secular Enlightenment values can be seen as grounded in such “self-evident” objects of faith (human rights, human dignity, freedom) [...]
In the domain of popular culture, the evolution of religion has been a hot topic, as evidenced by the recent spate of bestselling books and wide media coverage on the topic. A good deal of this recent literature has tended to view religion as a dispensable cognitive spandrel (Dennett 2006) or, worse, as a dangerous delusion (Dawkins 2006). Yet much research suggests that religion is not an aberrant disease or childish illusion, but rather that it may be one of the cornerstones of the evolution of large-scale complex human societies (Atran and Henrich 2010). ('The Cultural Evolution of Religion', https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... f_Religion)
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Religion is Darwinian
Dogs manage pack solidarity just by sniffing one another. It's so much more efficient than building cathedrals and pyramids!
Maybe we could just keep the drums and fire, but discard the expensive parts of religion?
-
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various
Re: Religion is Darwinian
There are other non-religious strategies humans has resorted to cope with that unavoidable existential crisis. This is obvious as there are many successful people who are non-religious and in addition the religion strategy is on the declining trend.
While there are pros from religions, there are also the cons of religions which is at present overweighing the pros of religions.
The evil threat of religions [especially Islam] is potentially so great that it can exterminate the human species.
Since the potentially threat of religion [especially Islam] likely to be catastrophic it would be wiser for humanity to find strategies to wean off religions and replace them with fool proof strategies to deal with than inherent unavoidable existential crisis.
- Mlw
- Posts: 256
- Joined: July 23rd, 2010, 5:03 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Augustine of Hippo
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Religion is Darwinian
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Religion is Darwinian
You know Muhammad invented that religion in self-defence against militant Christianity, right? The desert tribes were doing all right in their separate autonomies, until the Roman - lately turned Holy Roman - empire started mowing them down. They had to unite or die.
Beats the hell out of being conquered.They have conquered Lebensraum for themselves.
What, like oil, and the old and new kingdoms of Israel?How can you say that it's not a success story? How can you believe that they will listen to the argument that they shall give up their faith which has given them such great advantages, such as robbing peoples of their riches
Which ones? Where?and keeping European women in sexual slavery?
and as a footnote of some interest:
Was sexual predation and the subjugation of women unknown in Europe before the rise of Islam?
Does no other religious group have similar practices?
Is it religiously motivated?
Does it provide the perpetrator a genetic advantage over men who marry free women?
- Mlw
- Posts: 256
- Joined: July 23rd, 2010, 5:03 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Augustine of Hippo
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Religion is Darwinian
According to sharia and the Quran a man may have four wives and an untold number of sex slaves. Sexual slavery has always been part of Islam. Only between the 16th and 19th centuries, between 1 million and 1.25 million Europeans were captured. In medieval times, slave traders made expeditions as far as Iceland to capture white women. However, the majority of sex slaves were black women. A rough estimate by scholars of the number of black slaves held over twelve centuries in Muslim lands are between 11.5 million and 14 million (cf. Wikipedia).
It is remarkable that one can be so uninformed as you, when Wikipedia and other encyclopedias are only a click away. Laziness and nonchalance seem to be defining characteristics of human nature.
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Religion is Darwinian
All tribes warred among themselves, but that never stopped the Assyrians, Greeks, Egyptians, Romans and later Turks, French, English and Americans from expanding their empires across the Orient. Jesus is a prophet precisely because Muhammad patterned his uniting religion on the Judeo-Christian tradition, so that they would be "people of the Book": He hoped to be make peace with Christians and Jews.
The ownership of daughters and wives was just as much a part of the Judeo-Christian tradition.According to sharia and the Quran a man may have four wives and an untold number of sex slaves. Sexual slavery has always been part of Islam.
And during that same period, how many Africans, Indians, Asians, and American natives were captured by Europeans?Only between the 16th and 19th centuries, between 1 million and 1.25 million Europeans were captured.
Wiki that, too.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7990
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Religion is Darwinian
Religion in antiquity served the purpose of saving the ruling class (few) from being overrun by the rabble (many) who received very few resources here on earth by promising wealth in the afterlife.Mlw wrote: ↑July 17th, 2018, 1:28 pm The function of religion is to compensate for our worldly obsession and egocentric ambitions. It should serve to remove the believers from the narrow confines of the ego and introduce them to the divine perspective, which transcends the worldly. It is wholesome to get another perspective. Otherwise, the only thing that exists is Ego, like in Fichte's philosophy--a highly unsound state of mind that has detrimental consequences.
Without religion, neither the modern mind nor civilization could have emerged, because people would not have been socializable, unable to see the bigger picture. Religion is the bigger picture. Not everything is about one's personal life. Personality must take in the fresh air outside the narrow confines of the ego and its worldly obsessions with money, career, etc. Point is, if we don't have religion, then we will develop an unhealthy state of mind. This, in turn, will have detrimental effects on our worldly endeavour. So religion has increased the survival value among our species. Why we have religion can be explained from a Darwinian perspective, too.
Mats Winther | http://two-paths.com
In the Modern era, the lower classes receive a higher portion of wealth, so the purpose of religion has changed mostly to cultural habit and the answer for the desire for tradition.
- Mlw
- Posts: 256
- Joined: July 23rd, 2010, 5:03 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Augustine of Hippo
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Religion is Darwinian
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Religion is Darwinian
Such an explanation easier to line up with scientific investigation and empirical measures. Useful yes, but it is also ONE lens - the most useful? Again that would depend upon what “use” you wish for from such an endeavor.
I don’t think religion is Darwinism any more than I think anything else can be explained purely through that singular and very particular lens.
- Mlw
- Posts: 256
- Joined: July 23rd, 2010, 5:03 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Augustine of Hippo
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Religion is Darwinian
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Religion is Darwinian
He doesn’t deny the uses nor does he consider it all “plain silly,” although he has bolstered that view of himself in the public eye during debates with more myopic views on the otherside of the proverbial fence.
It makes perfect sense when I biologist refers to things in a biological frame. Darwins ideas were not completely confided and used within the scientific sphere and many other fields of study have taken up the principle.
- -1-
- Posts: 878
- Joined: December 1st, 2016, 2:23 am
Re: Religion is Darwinian
Evolutionary advantage includes silliness when it's an advantage. That's precisely what religionism is/does.Mlw wrote: ↑July 20th, 2018, 7:09 am Of course, it is merely one angle on religion. However, my point is that it doesn't make much sense when a Darwinist like Richard Dawkins entirely forgets about the Darwinian perspective. He just says that religion is plain silly! What a blunder! According to Darwinism anything goes, as long as it promotes the survival value.
Dawkins is not contradicting himself. He does not deny the evolutionary advantage of religion. He just calls it silly.
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Religion is Darwinian
Since people like believing silly things, any idjit can be pope, CEO or president and make serious profit.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023