Yes, it does indeed give us that question. It's a question that's been discussed to unbelievably great lengths (seriously at some points) elsewhere on this website. A pleasantly futile exercise. I think it was discussed in the guise of the pleasantly pointless question: "Can God create a stone that is so heavy that he/she cannot lift it?" If he/she can change the rules of logic then, yes. But, since the only way that we can even discuss the God concept is by using language, which itself relies on basic rules of logic, then ... I can't remember how that argument ends. But you get the idea.Fair point, but that just gives us the question "does the Deity have the power to control logic?" As in, is logic something within or without the Deity? I, for one, agree with you on that, that logic is something which a Deity must adhere to, but in an objective sense it's hard to discount that matter. One might claim that an absolutely omnipotent Deity can, and has, decided what "logic" even is. So, my theodicy still addresses the concept of an absolutely omnipotent Deity, or one with control over the laws of logic and biology.
Personally, I'm not religious so I can just treat all these sorts of discussions as interesting, but ultimately pointless, diversions. But if I were religious then I think I might agree with Dark Matter when he/she says:
As I understand it, part of the point of faith is that it has nothing to do with reasoned argument. If you have to make an evidence and logic based argument for your position then, by definition, it isn't faith. Of course if you don't have to do that, but want to do it anyway, just for fun, then fine. Plenty of religious people do. C S Lewis and the like.In short, theodicy is for the faithless. Reason is the servant of man, not the master.