Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
- TY91
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 8
- Joined: March 25th, 2017, 7:18 pm
Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
So I wondered if there is anyone who is a theist who does not believe in evil or, who is an atheist who does believe in evil.
As far as what is meant by the word "evil" in this case I will go with the general dictionary definition of "profoundly immoral and wicked".
-
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
If you associate 'evil' with Satan, then your definition is limited to whatever that is related to Satan only.
In practice, the term 'evil' is widely used by all of humanity, in philosophy, psychology, social, religion, spirituality, etc. As such I do not agree the term 'evil' should be confined to Satan or merely religious elements.
Because of the terrible deeds of humans in the present are getting worse and worse and stretching the limits, there is now a need to use the term 'evil' so that we can cover a wider extremes of abominable acts such a serial killing, mass rapes, genocides, suicide bombing, indiscriminate killing by Islamists, etc.
I define 'evil' as any human moral act [deliberate or otherwise] that is a net-negative on the well being of individual and therefrom the collective. Evil is opposite of what is 'good'.
To facilitate standardization, what is 'evil' is also defined in terms of degrees from Low [1/100] to High [99/100]. A petty crime would be say 5/100 while mass rapes and genocides would be 95/100. As such we need to prepare some sort of "taxonomy" to classify the various types of evils.
So, yes, a belief in evil do extend beyond theism into the wider secular community and necessary so.
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
Perhaps this is because of a fear that explaining why somebody has committed an evil act will somehow be seen as excusing it. It's an understandable fear. For example, anybody who tries to place terrorist acts, such as those of the IRA, into a wider context will be accused by some of being an apologist for terrorism.
-
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
- Felix
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
There are some religious sects such as Christian Scientists who believe that evil is a delusion of the "carnal mind," so in a sense it could be said they do not even believe in the existence (reality) of relative evil. And there are Hindu and Buddhist sects that have a similar perspective.
-
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
I wouldn't bet on it.Felix wrote:I don't think you'll find any theists whom will say that evil does not exist, period....
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
What I'm not sure of is "believe in".
I know some facts, believe some propositions through observation and testing; I believe many statements implicitly, based on my acquaintance with their sources; believe many others provisionally, and am willing to posit the truth of some, until I have time to process and examine them, simply because nothing to contradict them has occurred to me - as yet - or because I don't care enough to study them.
I do not believe in magic, gods, ghosts, healing through prayer, UFO's, Karma, inalienable rights, pixies, the soul, prophesy, witchcraft, an ultimate purpose of evolution, divination by blood-spatter, trickle-down economics, love that was meant to be, divine guidance, or the greatness of America....
To "believe in" something generally means attributing some supernatural aspect to it, and requires a degree of faith.
Alternatively, it can be used in a more mundane sense of having confidence or trust in something: the loyalty of a friend, the ability of an athlete, the integrity of a leader, the solidity of a structure, the social value of a philosophy.
Often, people use it to ascertain the bare existence of something - which seems to be the case here - but I'm never sure what they mean by "exist".
I do not believe in Evil.
I do not believe that concept has any independent existence - not as an entity, not as a spirit, not as a miasmis vapour, not as a free-floating curse.
Words are conceived in order to describe an observed phenomenon, designate an object or convey an idea that at least two individuals can understand in a similar way.
I do know that human beings often behave in ways that are destructive. It is the extreme forms of such behaviour that elicited the invention of the words "evil".
I believe people are are not about to stop behaving badly enough to earn that label -
if they ever do, the word will fall into disuse, as all obsolete words do.
- Felix
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
-
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
—Lily Tomlin
-
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
Point is in the above you have defined 'evil' within the ontological and religious framework which assume 'evil' to have an independent existence.Alias wrote:To "believe in" something generally means attributing some supernatural aspect to it, and requires a degree of faith.
Alternatively, it can be used in a more mundane sense of having confidence or trust in something: the loyalty of a friend, the ability of an athlete, the integrity of a leader, the solidity of a structure, the social value of a philosophy.
Often, people use it to ascertain the bare existence of something - which seems to be the case here - but I'm never sure what they mean by "exist".
I do not believe in Evil.
I do not believe that concept has any independent existence - not as an entity, not as a spirit, not as a miasmis vapour, not as a free-floating curse.
Words are conceived in order to describe an observed phenomenon, designate an object or convey an idea that at least two individuals can understand in a similar way.
As I had stated, the use of the term 'evil' depend on the framework it is defined.
From an empirical-philosophical framework, the human response to data is as follows;
1. An opinion - lack subjectivity and lack objectivity
2. A belief - sufficient subjectivity and lack objectivity
3. Knowledge - sufficient subjectivity and sufficient objectivity
Evil as defined within the above framework can be classed as 'knowledge' i.e. justified true beliefs when we establish the framework properly.
Within the above empirical framework 'evil' can be objectify within certain specified criteria and a 'taxonomy' of evil. There is no precision for such a framework and system at present but we can work toward refining a practical and useful system.
One example of the objectification of evil is from this;
Forensic psychiatrist Michael Stone of Columbia University has tabulated a hierarchy of evil from low to the most evils of human acts.
http://bigthink.com/the-voice-of-big-th ... le-of-evil
Obviously there will be various views on such an idea, but such objectification can be refined to be reasonably reliable and useful as a guide for human behavior.
From,
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concept-evil/
During the past thirty years, moral, political, and legal philosophers have become increasingly interested in the concept of evil. This interest has been partly motivated by ascriptions of ‘evil’ by laymen, social scientists, journalists, and politicians as they try to understand and respond to various atrocities and horrors of the past eighty years, e.g., the Holocaust, the Rwandan genocide, the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and killing sprees by serial killers such as Jeffery Dahmer. It seems that we cannot capture the moral significance of these actions and their perpetrators by calling them ‘wrong’ or ‘bad’ or even ‘very very wrong’ or ‘very very bad.’ We need the concept of evil.
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
How do you interpret thisSpectrum wrote: Point is in the above you have defined 'evil' within the ontological and religious framework which assume 'evil' to have an independent existence.
[A -- I do not believe that concept has any independent existence ]
to mean its exact opposite?
-
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
As I had stated you have defined 'evil' within the ontological and religious framework which assume 'evil' to have an independent existence, then you disagree with it.Alias wrote:How do you interpret thisSpectrum wrote: Point is in the above you have defined 'evil' within the ontological and religious framework which assume 'evil' to have an independent existence.
[A -- I do not believe that concept has any independent existence ]
to mean its exact opposite?
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: April 5th, 2017, 11:56 am
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
Natural evils are not man-caused, like an earthquake or plague.
Moral evils are willful acts by a human being, like rape and murder.
As you can see neither require a religious or supernatural belief.
Once you bring up the question of "satan", then you're applying a supernatural force to evil, which the atheist, whether they accept the existence of evil or not, will not apply.
I think many have the wrong impression of satan, according to Christian understanding, in that satan cannot "cause" anything. The entity does not have that kind of power. "satan" cannot cause plagues or force anyone to do anything against their own will.
When philosophers discuss the "problem of evil" it is within the context of evils relationship and existence with the existence of an omnipotent, benevolent, loving "god". "How can such a "god" allow evil to exist"? There are several responses to that question, including the free will defence.
-
From my perspective, the atheist who engages in argumentation over the existence of evil must admit that evil exists. If evil exists then what is evil is a matter of opinion for the atheist. While for the theist, specifically Christian, evil exists as a matter of cause.
I do not believe there is any theistic belief which does not accept the existence of evil in some manifestation. Whether as an inherent human property, and outside force, or both.
-
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
You stated that, yes. And now you have repeated that erroneous statement.Spectrum wrote:As I had stated you have defined 'evil' within the ontological and religious framework which assume 'evil' to have an independent existence, then you disagree with it.Alias wrote: (Nested quote removed.)
How do you interpret this
[A -- I do not believe that concept has any independent existence ]
to mean its exact opposite?
I defined evil as the description of extreme destructive human activity, and questioned the application of "believe in".
I still don't get what your problem is.
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Does belief in evil extend beyond thiesm?
Do you truly not understand what an atheist might mean when they call something or someone evil? Let me put it this way, can you think of more than one definition of evil, and can you think of a definition which would make sense when applied to an atheist? If you really can't, then I think you only have two reasonable options.Every atheist who poses the so-called problem of evil implicitly believes in evil.
1. Ask and then listen.
2. Go to a non philosophical site, maybe troll YouTube or something.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023