So you're an atheist? Not so fast.

Discuss philosophical questions regarding theism (and atheism), and discuss religion as it relates to philosophy. This includes any philosophical discussions that happen to be about god, gods, or a 'higher power' or the belief of them. This also generally includes philosophical topics about organized or ritualistic mysticism or about organized, common or ritualistic beliefs in the existence of supernatural phenomenon.
Post Reply
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: So you're an atheist? Not so fast.

Post by Steve3007 »

Personally I've never regarded it as a problem, regardless of whether I personally believe in the existence of God. If a God is postulated to exist then I'm perfectly happy with the explanations I've heard as to why destructive things happen in the world. Already discussed elsewhere.
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: So you're an atheist? Not so fast.

Post by Belindi »

Steve3007 wrote:Belindi:
Evil is a lot easier to define than good. Why is this?
Is it? If evil is defined as destructive couldn't good be defined as constructive?
I refer to the arguments for and against fracking. One side says evil for the purity of the water supply. The other side says evil to ignore the profit potential and evil to ignore the useful energy source. The good of pure water, and the good of profits, and of carbon energy are hard to pin down because the goods of those require arbitrary criteria.

Impure water, poverty, and hypothermia are self evident evils needing no arbitrary criteria. Not as far as common sense is concerned anyway.In order to support, for instance, pure water and the means whereby it's obtained we have to state the evils of impure water. Similarly for the ethics of any constructive scheme.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: So you're an atheist? Not so fast.

Post by Steve3007 »

Belindi:
I refer to the arguments for and against fracking. One side says evil for the purity of the water supply. The other side says evil to ignore the profit potential and evil to ignore the useful energy source. The good of pure water, and the good of profits, and of carbon energy are hard to pin down because the goods of those require arbitrary criteria.

Impure water, poverty, and hypothermia are self evident evils needing no arbitrary criteria. Not as far as common sense is concerned anyway.
Yes, interesting example. But by the same token, the "evils" of those two things are also hard to quantify and compare. The damage to the water supply is hard to quantitatively compare with the damage caused by not having the energy source and profit.

I think this kind of example also might illustrate something else that has occurred to me before: People often think that they disagree about values when, on much closer examination, they actually disagree about empirical facts. The fight over fracking seems, on the face of it, to be a clash of values between environmentalists and free-marketeers. But maybe the difference is more about the facts of what actions cause what results. Maybe they both want people to be happy and successful but disagree about how to go about that - a factual question.

It's only when all factual questions have been resolved that we discover if we disagree about values and therefore have to fight!
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: So you're an atheist? Not so fast.

Post by Belindi »

Steve wrote:
It's only when all factual questions have been resolved that we discover if we disagree about values and therefore have to fight!
I very much agree. It's hard to know the facts when one is not an expert. What is the best way to identify a good secondary source for contemporary engineering problems that have social corollaries?

I trust The Guardian, but maybe I should be more sceptical
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: So you're an atheist? Not so fast.

Post by Steve3007 »

I guess this is now the question of how we decide how to assess sources of information for accuracy. I suppose in theory we should be able to just read a single source, like the Guardian or whatever, because one of the basic skills that professional journalists should have, and exercise, is the ability to assimilate information from several different sources. So they should be doing the job of checking sources, and not just relying on one, for you.

But we all know that it doesn't entirely work like that and we have to do some of that cross-checking from multiple sources ourselves. I suppose the extent to which we have to (or can) do that now is what is sometimes called the rise of "citizen journalism".
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: So you're an atheist? Not so fast.

Post by Belindi »

Thanks Steve. Citizen journalism is a new idea for me. I don't even know where to start.

-- Updated October 17th, 2017, 5:38 am to add the following --

Morality is a consensus about right behaviour. Every society needs such a consensus.

The metaphysical God idea is unnecessary for legitimating moral consensus, because an idea which is accepted as idea suffices. True, people will objectify the moral consensus in ways other than the metaphysical God. They will objectify the nation, or the geography (e.g. "Shore to shining shore"), or some hero myth such as Hitler , or the Queen. True, some people find it difficult to be loyal to an idea and need an object of loyalty, some object which is enshrined in a grand meme such as e.g. "Almighty God", or "the old country".

If individuals , especially plebs, are not to be coerced by the powerful then individuals need education which will arm them against seductive memes.

The metaphysical God is a seductive meme, which has been taken for granted for centuries and has been subjected to ridiculous so-called "proofs".

.
User avatar
Albert Tatlock
Posts: 183
Joined: October 15th, 2017, 3:23 pm

Re: So you're an atheist? Not so fast.

Post by Albert Tatlock »

Hereandnow wrote:Anti-objectivists here deny that ethical values need for their theoretical underpinning something absolute,
It's quite possible for our moral principles to feel as though they are objective even though we know perfectly well they are not. Seeing as it is in our own interest, as well as that of society as a whole, to have a culture of morality, it seems quite rational to behave as if morality were objective regardless of whether we believe that or not.
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Religion, Theism and Mythology”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021