God is an Impossibility.

Discuss philosophical questions regarding theism (and atheism), and discuss religion as it relates to philosophy. This includes any philosophical discussions that happen to be about god, gods, or a 'higher power' or the belief of them. This also generally includes philosophical topics about organized or ritualistic mysticism or about organized, common or ritualistic beliefs in the existence of supernatural phenomenon.
Post Reply
Fanman
Posts: 3258
Joined: December 14th, 2011, 9:42 am

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Fanman »

Spectrum:
I have argued with logical and reason, God is an impossibility, i.e. it is a non-starter. As such there is no room for any one to even think there is any possibility God can exists.
In your case, you are resorting and banging on the sub-reality of the psychological to console yourself there is a possibility [no matter how slight] a has-to-be absolute perfect god may exists.
Statements like this make it difficult to argue with you. I have not argued that an absolutely perfect God exists. Neither have I said anything about a "sub-reality" whatever that means. I've argued against this:
  • a God by default must be absolutely perfect and
    that absolute perfection is an impossibility [to be real],
    God is an impossibility to be real.
Which you believes proves that God cannot exist. I'm going to bow out of the argument here.
Theists believe, agnostics ponder and atheists analyse. A little bit of each should get us the right answer.
Spectrum
Posts: 5161
Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Spectrum »

Dark Matter wrote: :lol: So, you choose to go the way of the infantile straw man. You have no argument apart from your arrogance and conceit.
??
You can't define perfection or God for theists and then base your argument on that without appealing to a straw man.
As usual, you are flinging statements everywhere without any basis nor argument.
I have presented my argument and supported the major and minor premises with details.
To define something is to set boundaries, but the power of being itself is without boundaries.
Yours is a straw man.

Note the meaning of 'define';
  • 1. to state or set forth the meaning of (a word, phrase, etc.): They disagreed on how to define “liberal.”.
    2. to explain or identify the nature or essential qualities of; describe:
    to define judicial functions.
    3. to fix or lay down clearly and definitely; specify distinctly:
    to define one's responsibilities.
    Synonyms: state, name, describe, detail, enumerate.
    4. to determine or fix the boundaries or extent of:
    to define property with stakes.
    5. to make clear the outline or form of:
    The roof was boldly defined against the sky.
    http://www.dictionary.com/browse/define
You deceptively choose 4 and ignored the others.
What I have done is using 1 & 2 to support my argument.
That's why "Traditional arguments for the existence of God actually deny the reality of God because the concept of existence is confining and because the process of arguing the reality of God demeans the grandeur of God. If God could be defined by the conclusion of an argument, then God would be reduced to the same categorical level as the other elements of the argument. Still, arguments for the existence of God function in a positive way because they show the seriousness of human concern about knowing God." (Tillich, by Donald Musser and Joseph Price)
This is another strawman.
I have not "defined" God by the conclusion of an argument.
My conclusion is derived deductively from the major premises, followed to the minor and thus the conclusion.
Read my syllogism, I did not state 'absolute perfection is an impossibility' and immediately jumped to the conclusion 'God is an impossibility'. The argument is 'God imperative MUST be absolutely perfect' as I have demonstrated why, thus it follows deductively, God is an impossibility.

The argument for the existence of God [God is an impossibility] especially at present is very relevant especially when the consequences of theism is the terrible malignant evils and violence committed by SOME theists who are inspired by the words of an illusory God.

There are non-theistics approaches [without evil laden elements] that are available to deal with the inherent existential crisis that theism covering for. My proposals is theism should be weaned off gradually and voluntarily based on philosophical, critical and rational thinking as humanity progress into the future.

Those who are into theism are indirectly complicit to the above evils committed by SOME evil prone theists.
"By love he may be gotten and holden; by thought, never." There is a reason the unknown author wrote that, and there is a reason why theists everywhere agree.
All humans has the potential for theism, and that theistic-potential is active in the majority of people. Majority consensus do not equal truth of reality unless support by rationally justified empirical evidences.

That "he" i.e. God is an impossibility and God is compelled to be possible only for psychological reasons to deal with an existential crisis.
Not-a-theist. Religion is a critical necessity for humanity now, but not the FUTURE.
Dark Matter
Posts: 1366
Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Dark Matter »

Wow! :roll: Are you part of "Antifa" by any chance?
Spectrum
Posts: 5161
Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Spectrum »

Dark Matter wrote:Wow! :roll: Are you part of "Antifa" by any chance?
The evil primal acts of "Antifa" are driven by the same primal forces like that of the evil prone theists. Note my extensive critique of Islam, 'Antifa' would surely shout "Islamophobia"
Not-a-theist. Religion is a critical necessity for humanity now, but not the FUTURE.
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Sy Borg »

Fanman wrote:I've argued against this:
  • a God by default must be absolutely perfect and
    that absolute perfection is an impossibility [to be real],
    God is an impossibility to be real.
Which you believe proves that God cannot exist. I'm going to bow out of the argument here.
Well, for the record, I agree with you. Logically disproving the existence of a seemingly impossible deity doesn't mean much, and probably wouldn't convince fundies anyway.

There is no reason whatsoever why a deity, if existent, need be perfect, omnipresent or omnipotent. If deities exist, or if a deity exists, they/it might just seem all-powerful to us (like the Sun) but still be small compared with the total universe. For all we know, deities may emerge in the universe, and evolve and grow like life.

We certainly should not make any assumptions based on Abrahamic texts, whose ideas and claims seem far more base and superstitious than those of mystics in far East.
Spectrum
Posts: 5161
Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Spectrum »

Fanman wrote:I've argued against this:
  • a God by default must be absolutely perfect and
    that absolute perfection is an impossibility [to be real],
    God is an impossibility to be real.
Which you believe proves that God cannot exist. I'm going to bow out of the argument here.
Greta wrote:Well, for the record, I agree with you. Logically disproving the existence of a seemingly impossible deity doesn't mean much, and probably wouldn't convince fundies anyway.
...
We certainly should not make any assumptions based on Abrahamic texts, whose ideas and claims seem far more base and superstitious than those of mystics in far East.
I am arguing God in general is an impossibility and that include the deistic, pantheist and panentheistic God where its qualities are pointing toward an absolutely perfect God.

My real concern is to defang the Abrahamic believers who are contributing almost all of the theistic-based evils as inspired by verses in their holy texts.
The fundies will definitely resist, but where the argument is sound and convincing to the critical mass and accepted by them, the resistance of the fundies will crumbled.
At present it is not the case, the majority of Abrahamic believers take it their God exists as real in listening and answering their prayers and had promised them a passage to Paradise (with virgins as a bonus from Allah) and more assuredly if they kill non-believers [e.g. in Islam].
So far there is no convincing arguments to checkmate theists in their belief, but I believe my argument is a complete one to checkmate all the theistic moves.
There is no reason whatsoever why a deity, if existent, need be perfect, omnipresent or omnipotent. If deities exist, or if a deity exists, they/it might just seem all-powerful to us (like the Sun) but still be small compared with the total universe. For all we know, deities may emerge in the universe, and evolve and grow like life.
As I had stated, if a theist claimed their God has anthropomorphic qualities and understand its limitation as an inferior God to another claim, I have no issue with that. There are many theists who claim and believe in a Monkey-liked God [Hanuman] and others claim all sorts of empirical-based gods exist. Empirical based gods are empirically possible but the probability of them existing as real is very slim which might as well be zero. The ultimate point to prove such a god is really real, one will have to produce empirical evidence, which is not likely in practice.
Thus I am not overly concern with claims of empirical gods which may possibly exist empirically. Just bring the empirical evidence then only we can start to talk about it.

What we are more concern with are the 5.4 billion theists out of 7+ billion people who believe in a monotheistic God which in principle must lead to an absolutely perfect God, i.e. an ontological God which must be omnipotent and omni-whatever.

Proving "God is an Impossibility" is a benefit for the progress of humanity in the future, i.e. defang and eliminate all possibilities of theistic-based evils inspired by a God.
Not-a-theist. Religion is a critical necessity for humanity now, but not the FUTURE.
User avatar
Aurelio
New Trial Member
Posts: 1
Joined: September 12th, 2017, 5:05 am

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Aurelio »

God is neither an impossibility nor is God non existent
God is a necessity to those who believe, and a non entity to those who don't.
Social problems arise when it's a question as to which God or whose God.
The reality is that even if one had empirical truth as to the non existence of God, in any form, that one could present to the masses you would only attempt to do so if you were protected by a force field, and then the question would be asked,.......'to what end'
To deny the existence of God to the masses would be akin to denying them hope, because that is what God represents to them...a focal point of possibility
God an impracticality...yes...but then define God.
In the minds of the masses God exists, because of their need for a God.
Fanaticism is another thing entirely
Dark Matter
Posts: 1366
Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Dark Matter »

Greta wrote: We certainly should not make any assumptions based on Abrahamic texts, whose ideas and claims seem far more base and superstitious than those of mystics in far East.
Really? Why are you so biased?
Fanman
Posts: 3258
Joined: December 14th, 2011, 9:42 am

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Fanman »

Greta:
Well, for the record, I agree with you. Logically disproving the existence of a seemingly impossible deity doesn't mean much, and probably wouldn't convince fundies anyway.
I agree.
There is no reason whatsoever why a deity, if existent, need be perfect, omnipresent or omnipotent. If deities exist, or if a deity exists, they/it might just seem all-powerful to us (like the Sun) but still be small compared with the total universe. For all we know, deities may emerge in the universe, and evolve and grow like life.
Exactly. I don't think that perfection is a necessity for a deity or deities if it/they exist. What would perfection (a relative term) even mean when applied to a deity or deities? "Absolute perfection", I don't really understand what that term strictly means that term so I'll say "perfection", does not define whether something can or cannot exist - it doesn't logically follow as perfection is not a requisite of existence.
We certainly should not make any assumptions based on Abrahamic texts, whose ideas and claims seem far more base and superstitious than those of mystics in far East.
I agree. Some theists, through their faith, go as far as to draw absolute conclusions about the nature of all reality based upon those texts. Reality could be much more than we currently understand, we only inhabit a tiny part of the universe. So making conclusions about all of reality based upon ancient texts when knowledge was very local doesn't seem right.

-- Updated November 12th, 2017, 7:31 am to add the following --

My second paragraph should read: Exactly. I don't think that perfection is a necessity for a deity or deities if it/they exist. What would perfection (a relative term) even mean when applied to a deity or deities? "Absolute perfection", I don't really understand what that term strictly means so I'll say "perfection", does not define whether something can or cannot exist - it doesn't logically follow as perfection is not a requisite of existence.
Theists believe, agnostics ponder and atheists analyse. A little bit of each should get us the right answer.
Spectrum
Posts: 5161
Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Spectrum »

Aurelio wrote:God is neither an impossibility nor is God non existent
God is a necessity to those who believe, and a non entity to those who don't.
Social problems arise when it's a question as to which God or whose God.
The reality is that even if one had empirical truth as to the non existence of God, in any form, that one could present to the masses you would only attempt to do so if you were protected by a force field, and then the question would be asked,.......'to what end'
Long ago, people had recognized the problem of Infinite Regression. The 'end' is an ontological God, i.e. "a Being than which no greater can arise in any way." I had demonstrated such an ontological God is impossible to be real within reality except in thoughts only.
To deny the existence of God to the masses would be akin to denying them hope, because that is what God represents to them...a focal point of possibility
God an impracticality...yes...but then define God.
In the minds of the masses God exists, because of their need for a God.
Fanaticism is another thing entirely.
You have not provided any basis why fanaticism is independent from the belief in God.
I have done extensively research on the causal relation between theism and theistic-based evils and violence, especially from the Abrahamic religions, notably Islam.

Note my signature below. I recognized religions & theism is a critical necessity for the majority in the past and the present, but the cons of theism are outweighing its pros as humanity is progressing exponentially into the future. The very possibility of extreme is, religious extremists as inspired by their God, could exterminate the human species.

Why the idea of God [illusory] arose and continue to arise in the cognition of the majority is due to psychological factors to deal with an existential crisis that manifest hope [as you say] for some greater good, especially salvation for the Abrahamic believers.
When it is merely for psychological factors, theism is not worth it when compared to the real and potential evils, violence and threats to the progress of humanity.

Thus is it more rational and wiser to deal with such psychological existential issue without a God and thus avoid ALL theistic-based evils and violence.
Many Eastern 'spiritualities' had adopted the non-theistic approach to deal with the same existential problems without any corruption of evils and violence in its doctrines. So it is possible for theistic approaches to be replaced [voluntarily] with the non-theistic approaches.
Not-a-theist. Religion is a critical necessity for humanity now, but not the FUTURE.
Dark Matter
Posts: 1366
Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Dark Matter »

You sure have some funny ideas about what constitutes proof, wisdom, perfection, research and what’s rational, Spectrum. Reading your posts brings to mind Bizarro World comics.
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Sy Borg »

Dark Matter wrote:
Greta wrote: We certainly should not make any assumptions based on Abrahamic texts, whose ideas and claims seem far more base and superstitious than those of mystics in far East.
Really? Why are you so biased?
I just think the Buddhists have less problems with literalism and misinterpretation of the metaphors of their own religious tomes than do the Abrahamics.

-- Updated 12 Nov 2017, 23:24 to add the following --
Fanman wrote:I don't think that perfection is a necessity for a deity or deities if it/they exist. What would perfection (a relative term) even mean when applied to a deity or deities? "Absolute perfection", I don't really understand what that term strictly means so I'll say "perfection", does not define whether something can or cannot exist - it doesn't logically follow as perfection is not a requisite of existence.
Yes. Perfection is unchanging, thus dead, and also logically non-existent in reality. Perfection does not even exist as a meme, only an abstraction, because no one can imagine any kind of perfection, although they might think they do at times.
Spectrum
Posts: 5161
Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Spectrum »

Greta wrote:Yes. Perfection is unchanging, thus dead, and also logically non-existent in reality. Perfection does not even exist as a meme, only an abstraction, because no one can imagine any kind of perfection, although they might think they do at times.
That is my point,

the idea of perfection is "logically non-existent in reality" i.e. in empirical reality.
But some thinking theists insist their God is 'absolutely perfect" [St. Anselm, Descartes, and all their followers] in empirical reality.
However I further argued, whatever God theists present [ignorantly], ultimately it has to be an absolutely perfect God.
What is real is SOME of these theists [especially the Abrahamic] rely on such an absolutely perfect God to commit terrible and the full range of evils and violence on non-believers and even their own kind.

What is going on is the acceptance of the idea of an absolute perfect God as real [in reality it is not] provide moral support implicitly to those evil prone theists to commit terrible evils as divine duty inspired by the God.

I believe you [living in a majority non-Muslim country] are not aware and mindful of the full impact and potential of the terrible evils, terror and violence committed by evil prone theists of all kinds [especially from Islam] as inspired by their God's words.

Christians are demanding the teaching of creationism, abandoning evolution and other scientific theories. Jihadists are killing non-Muslims because they believe Allah sanctions it. Now, where we can prove God is an impossibility, these evil prone theists will be defanged and have no grounds to rely on a God [illusory] to kill non-believers to satisfy their desperate lust for an imagined paradise with virgins.
It is obvious, Muslims are demanding for Sharia Laws, killing of apostates, 100 lashes for adultery, wear the hijab without respect for rules, and all sorts of impingments on the basic rights of non-Muslims, all because they believe Allah the absolutely perfect God is very real.

To resolve the whole load of evils [full range] of theistic based evil, the most effective solution to convince [by argument] their God is an impossibility and there upon provide them alternative solutions [this is critical] to deal with that inherent existential crisis. I am confident of this because the truth will always prevails.

Note 'absolute perfection' cannot be imagined [restricted to the empirical only] nor can it be conceived [due to lack of empirical element for conceptual reasoning]. The idea of an absolutely perfect God only arise from pure primal reason driven by psychological factors.

Note this from Kant re thing-in-itself and manifesting as God;
[b]Kant[/b] in CPR wrote:There will therefore be Syllogisms which contain no Empirical premisses, and by means of which we conclude from something which we know to something else of which we have no Concept, and to which, owing to an inevitable Illusion, we yet ascribe Objective Reality.

These conclusions [of an absolutely perfect God] are, then, rather to be called pseudo-Rational 2 than Rational, although in view of their Origin they may well lay claim to the latter title, since they are not fictitious and have not arisen fortuitously, but have sprung from the very Nature of Reason.

They are sophistications not of men but of Pure Reason itself. Even the wisest of men cannot free himself from them. After long effort he perhaps succeeds in guarding himself against actual error; but he will never be able to free himself from the Illusion, which unceasingly mocks and torments him. B397
Not-a-theist. Religion is a critical necessity for humanity now, but not the FUTURE.
Dark Matter
Posts: 1366
Joined: August 18th, 2016, 11:29 am
Favorite Philosopher: Paul Tillich

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Dark Matter »

Greta wrote: Yes. Perfection is unchanging, thus dead, and also logically non-existent in reality. Perfection does not even exist as a meme, only an abstraction, because no one can imagine any kind of perfection, although they might think they do at times.
Perfection implies immutability, but it does not imply immobility. To deny the possibility of its volitional self-limitation amounts to a denial of the very concept of its volitional absoluteness, and hence its perfection.
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14997
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: God is an Impossibility.

Post by Sy Borg »

Ie. so you mean the perfection is not absolute but there is an appropriate state of perfection for each moment?
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Religion, Theism and Mythology”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021