Cases against Teleological Arguments

Discuss philosophical questions regarding theism (and atheism), and discuss religion as it relates to philosophy. This includes any philosophical discussions that happen to be about god, gods, or a 'higher power' or the belief of them. This also generally includes philosophical topics about organized or ritualistic mysticism or about organized, common or ritualistic beliefs in the existence of supernatural phenomenon.
Post Reply
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Felix »

Well that pun went over like a Led Zeppelin.... :|
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
Alias
Posts: 3119
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Alias »

Felix wrote: June 9th, 2018, 3:40 am [-if Nature can be conscious without an agent having made it so
-then life can become conscious without an agent [Nature] having made it so. ]

You are reading me too literally, I never said that Nature made life conscious, I did say that intelligence is integral to Nature and this is reflected in Life. It's not a matter of one producing the other but of one being instrumental to the other, just as the acorn is the means for generating the oak tree - or vice versa, depending upon how you look at it.
So - life also produces Nature? And they're both intelligent? And they make each other conscious? So we don't need complexity to arise from simplicity, because Nature and Life complicate each other with a purpose. ?

It's hopeless. I'm lost.
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Felix »

"It's hopeless. I'm lost."
Hey, don't blame me for your confusion. It's not that complicated: consciousness or intelligent order is fundamental to the Universe, Nature, Life, etc.
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
User avatar
Thinking critical
Posts: 1793
Joined: November 7th, 2011, 7:29 pm
Favorite Philosopher: A.C Grayling
Location: Perth, Australia (originally New Zealand)

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Thinking critical »

Felix wrote: June 9th, 2018, 12:56 pm
"It's hopeless. I'm lost."
Hey, don't blame me for your confusion. It's not that complicated: consciousness or intelligent order is fundamental to the Universe, Nature, Life, etc.
Except for 99% of the Universe where there is no complexity or consciousness. Intelligence is fundamental to beings who wish to make sense of the Universe, the Universe itself is guided by the laws of physics - gravity, electro magnetism, strong and weak nuclear force.
This cocky little cognitive contortionist will straighten you right out
Alias
Posts: 3119
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Alias »

Felix wrote: June 9th, 2018, 12:56 pm Hey, don't blame me for your confusion. It's not that complicated: consciousness or intelligent order is fundamental to the Universe, Nature, Life, etc.
The Universe, Life and Nature are all conscious and intelligent, and purposeful. None of them had this them became conscious, intelligent and purposeful first, to cause the other(s).
I'm not smart enough to understand how this works.

Can I at least ask what their purpose is?
Alias
Posts: 3119
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Alias »

Alias wrote: June 9th, 2018, 4:03 pm
Felix wrote: June 9th, 2018, 12:56 pm Hey, don't blame me for your confusion. It's not that complicated: consciousness or intelligent order is fundamental to the Universe, Nature, Life, etc.
The Universe, Life and Nature are all conscious and intelligent, and purposeful. None of became conscious, intelligent and purposeful first, to cause the other(s).
I'm not smart enough to understand how this works.
(See? I can't even construct a sentence.)

Can I at least ask what their purpose is?
User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 1122
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by ThomasHobbes »

Alias wrote: June 8th, 2018, 7:39 pm
ThomasHobbes wrote: June 8th, 2018, 6:25 pm It is a vestige of a more complex organ.
Yes - possibly a secondary stomach for storing and perhaps fermenting fibrous plant material. However, the caecum is so far down the digestive tract that no nutrient could be retrieved from its product, so it's more likely to be retaining mineral salts, perhaps water, and to prepare indigestible matter for painless excretion.
However, all primates and several other species also have an appendix, which would be a highly coincidental vestige for unrelated animals with different diets to have in common; so
It has evolved to a point of being completely unnecessary.
according to that cited article, it does have a use - presumably from quite a long way back in evolution - of storing needed bacteria, in case of gastrointestinal extinction events. That's what made it worth keeping. ..
I mean, that's why the individuals that had retained this vestigial organ survived severe dehydration and gut-purging epidemics.
People without appendixes survive dehydration and wTF "gut-purging epidemics'.

We can all have them removed with NO adverse effects, therefore they are completely unnecessary. It's not even relevant if they do something.
They are about as useful as nipple on men.
User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 1122
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by ThomasHobbes »

Alias wrote: June 9th, 2018, 4:03 pm
Felix wrote: June 9th, 2018, 12:56 pm Hey, don't blame me for your confusion. It's not that complicated: consciousness or intelligent order is fundamental to the Universe, Nature, Life, etc.
The Universe, Life and Nature are all conscious and intelligent, and purposeful. None of them had this them became conscious, intelligent and purposeful first, to cause the other(s).
I'm not smart enough to understand how this works.

Can I at least ask what their purpose is?
This statement "It's not that complicated: consciousness or intelligent order is fundamental to the Universe,", is absurdly logically and empirically false.
All evidence points to consciousness coming very late to the universe, and likely to be somewhat temporary, given the age of the universe.
Alias
Posts: 3119
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Alias »

ThomasHobbes wrote: June 9th, 2018, 5:43 pm People without appendixes survive dehydration and wTF "gut-purging epidemics'.
Dysentery, Salmonella, Typhoid, E. coli, cholera, clostridium and like that.
Now in countries with advanced medicine readily available, people without an appendix survive to reproduce.
Not so much, a few million years ago, when evolution favoured the ones with.
I'm not particularly concerned about the appendix, one way or the other. Just attempting to clarify recent findings why its retention is not an evolutionary mistake, after all.
Belindi
Moderator
Posts: 6105
Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Belindi »

Thomas Hobbes wrote:
We can all have them removed with NO adverse effects, therefore they are completely unnecessary. It's not even relevant if they do something.
They are about as useful as nipple on men.
You believe that then.
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Felix »

Alias: Can I at least ask what their purpose is?
The purpose of what, the Universe/Nature/Life? Like everyone else I can only speculate, could be an endless number of them.
ThomasHobbes: All evidence points to consciousness coming very late to the universe, and likely to be somewhat temporary, given the age of the universe.
We don't know the age of the Universe. I presume you're referring to it's purported age based on the premise that it started with the "big bang." But there's no reason to believe the Universe began then, unless you believe that it suddenly burst into existence out of nowhere. In an eternal universe, temporal universes and temporal vehicles of consciousness will come and go, but the source of their existence is timeless.
Alias: Now in countries with advanced medicine readily available, people without an appendix survive to reproduce.
Not any more, modern medicine has been stymied by new strains of intestinal and other bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics, such as c. diff.
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
User avatar
Thinking critical
Posts: 1793
Joined: November 7th, 2011, 7:29 pm
Favorite Philosopher: A.C Grayling
Location: Perth, Australia (originally New Zealand)

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Thinking critical »

Felix wrote: June 10th, 2018, 3:54 am
We don't know the age of the Universe. I presume you're referring to it's purported age based on the premise that it started with the "big bang." But there's no reason to believe the Universe began then, unless you believe that it suddenly burst into existence out of nowhere. In an eternal universe, temporal universes and temporal vehicles of consciousness will come and go, but the source of their existence is timeless.
I'm not sure who you're referring to by "we" in regards to the age of the Universe, however the excepted consensus by pretty much all cosmologists, Astro physicists and theoretical physicists is that the a Universe has a beginning and it's age is approximately 13.8 billion years old.
The BBT makes no such claim that the Universe suddenly burst into existence out of nowhere, this is a common misconception by lay folk, in fact the BBT makes no claims what so ever to the origin of the Universe.
However an eternal Universe does not match any observations from expansion or data from the CMB and contradicts the first and second law of thermodynamics.
This cocky little cognitive contortionist will straighten you right out
Karpel Tunnel
Posts: 948
Joined: February 16th, 2018, 11:28 am

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Karpel Tunnel »

ThomasHobbes wrote: June 8th, 2018, 6:25 pm
Karpel Tunnel wrote: June 8th, 2018, 4:01 am
What did you mean when you brought up the appendix above?
It is a vestige of a more complex organ.
It has evolved to a point of being completely unnecessary.
So you disagree with the scientists.

Here's another link:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... been-lost/
Karpel Tunnel
Posts: 948
Joined: February 16th, 2018, 11:28 am

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Karpel Tunnel »

TH
And of course the original link I gave you countered your claim also. I wish you had read it and addressed it, instead of simply making explicit your incorrect claim that it counters and this latter link counters.
Alias
Posts: 3119
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett

Re: Cases against Teleological Arguments

Post by Alias »

Felix wrote: June 10th, 2018, 3:54 am The purpose of what, the Universe/Nature/Life? Like everyone else I can only speculate, could be an endless number of them.
If you don't know what the purpose is, how do you identify purposeful action?
How do you know progress is being made toward and aim, or that there is one?
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Religion, Theism and Mythology”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021