Good feelings embedded in the contingencies of the world is shot through with outrageous fortune. No wonder Buddhists sequester themselves.Eduk:
My nail example was supposed to be an attempt to explain the difference. For example if we feel good but for the wrong reasons and then find out those reasons were wrong we instantly lose this good feeling. In this sense our good feeling, which seemed real to us, is hollow and easily destroyed.
Nirvana
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Nirvana
I believe children grow up and learn. The bliss they may feel as children may be very different than the bliss they feel as adults. This is basically the happy pig V unhappy man conundrum.But I am not sure where the idea that we must earn bliss comes from? Have children earned the bliss they feel? Are they cheating somehow?
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Nirvana
Absolutely. But there is also reasonableness to take into account. If you did your absolute best to arrive to the most reasonable conclusion and it turns out to be wrong at least you have this knowledge in your methodological soundness. It is not always about consequentialism. But it's hard (impossible) to be impervious to such things.Good feelings embedded in the contingencies of the world is shot through with outrageous fortune
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
- Felix
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am
Re: Nirvana
You are confusing bliss or nirvana with some sort of chemically induced high - whether that chemical be endogenous or not. It is about transcending the pleasure/pain polarity rather than being trapped in it.Eduk: I would argue that concentrating on being blissful until the point where you are blissful is mostly unearned and therefore of no true value.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15148
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Nirvana
I actually agree with you, but was elucidating the usual rationale for not valuing drug-induced unearned bliss.Hereandnow wrote: ↑September 6th, 2018, 9:21 amAs to Greta's comment, I read Dewey and he is good on this, he is in her corner: work, good work with a beginning and a consummation, is what joy is all about. I disagree. I think the joy of completing work is a satisfying, but nowhere within parsecs of nirvana or love.
Actually, I see nothing admirable whatsoever in the avoidance of drugs - be it coffee, tea, booze or the illegals. Lifelong abstinence is just a decision to eschew certain risks based on what the media and others have told you. It's just a choice, and one that is meaningless in terms of morality or value, despite the usual assumptions of the public.
If an esoteric experience provides practical growth and/or learning then it's worthwhile. How such an experience is attained IMO is only important insofar as it affects health, and whether it can be controlled.
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Nirvana
The phenomenon spoken of here is likely part of the developmental stage of humans. You tend to find people have these “heightened” experiences in their 30’s. It is most certainly not equivalent to “fulfillment” or anything to do with being “happy”.
I have spoken to people who’ve taken heroin and they talk about feeling nothing emotionally, it may well be the opposite of what is being discussed here - that being something that opens up like a raw nerve. To understand and actually experience happiness as infantile and trivial is not really something that is easily articulated. “Bliss” is one attempt and “awe” is another.
As far as I can tell nirvana, heaven and all the other mythos basically reside within this unusual experience. I imagine you can get something akin to it in some respects with drugs - ayuhausca (DMT) is the most relevant example I’ve heard and is not “recreational” by any means.
- DragonflyRider
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 8
- Joined: September 4th, 2018, 11:33 pm
Re: Nirvana
True enough. It belongs in the same category with omnipotence, omniscience, perfection and other examples of the infinite which do not exist in reality.
Indeed! But then what, do we throw all of this out? Is something only useful or relevant if it is not factual and tangible, absolute and unrefutable? Could these concepts not act as catalyzers for the development and expansion of our individual experience?
So, even if we were to consider that the only Nirvana worth talking about needs to be the 100% utopic and idealized version of itself, we could still definitely derive benefit from it, even if it were false (unless, of course, the only reason to expand our intellect were to check off the magical list of life which things are real and which ones are not, turning our backs to anything that cannot bite us, be eaten, or copulated with).
Having made that point, our conceptions of what is factual or not is extremely limited to our own experience, so if you haven't ever experienced something that surprised you and drastically altered your perspective and self, then it makes sense that anything you haven't digested yet would seem absolutely indigestible, and anyone who consumes that thing would seem crazy.
- DragonflyRider
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 8
- Joined: September 4th, 2018, 11:33 pm
Re: Nirvana
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
Nirvana should be thought of as a myth, I don't think. It is an alien term outside of the mainstream conversations we in the west are familiar with, but it is a subject fact, like feeling in love. Stories like Arthurian legends, are largely mythological, but that doesn't make romance a myth.BG
nirvana, heaven and all the other mythos
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
Some "illegals" are off the charts amazing. Makes Aldous Huxley's Doors of Perception seem....errr, more than merely interesting. Ponderous.Greta:
Actually, I see nothing admirable whatsoever in the avoidance of drugs - be it coffee, tea, booze or the illegals. Lifelong abstinence is just a decision to eschew certain risks based on what the media and others have told you. It's just a choice, and one that is meaningless in terms of morality or value, despite the usual assumptions of the public.
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
I don't proof read just to spite myself. Serves me right not to be understood.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15148
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Nirvana
Yes, philosophers, scientists and others long experimented with different mental states. Today's taboos against such things is a fad that's naively presumed to be universal because society's focus is on productivity. There is no interest in individuals' happiness or health, only productivity. Rational individuals do not share such utilitarian goals for themselves.Hereandnow wrote: ↑September 9th, 2018, 9:25 pmSome "illegals" are off the charts amazing. Makes Aldous Huxley's Doors of Perception seem....errr, more than merely interesting. Ponderous.Greta:
Actually, I see nothing admirable whatsoever in the avoidance of drugs - be it coffee, tea, booze or the illegals. Lifelong abstinence is just a decision to eschew certain risks based on what the media and others have told you. It's just a choice, and one that is meaningless in terms of morality or value, despite the usual assumptions of the public.
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
Guy Debord wrote very bitterly about a society's dignity and worth being reduced to commodity fetishism. That was the sixties when ideas seemed to matter. Hope it doesn't take a crisis to bring respect for persons, as the multiculturalists used to put it, back.Greta
There is no interest in individuals' happiness or health, only productivity.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023