Discrimination against young people
- Ncole1
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: May 26th, 2017, 6:52 pm
Discrimination against young people
Just about all the studies of decision-making in young people as well as response to social influences seem to either be inconclusive or they show that about 25% of the adult population is actually less mature than the average 13-year-old. Such age-limits as 16 or 18 thus are discriminatory, because we do not declare such a large percent of non-demented adults to be mentally incompetent.
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: May 26th, 2017, 1:39 pm
Re: Discrimination against young people
- Ncole1
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: May 26th, 2017, 6:52 pm
Re: Discrimination against young people
It is definitely true that there is a shift in the overall balance of gray matter and white matter in most people's brains that doesn't really slow down until the mid-20s, in particular, gray matter cortical thickness peaks around age 12 while white matter volume doesn't peak until age ~30, IIRC. However, the peak cortical thickness of gray matter is actually later in the temporal and parietal lobes than it is in the frontal areas, and the white matter volumes even in frontal areas vary so much from person to person that even though the average does not peak until around age 30, we would find that a significant percentage of adults have a lower volume than the median adolescent. Hence if we used white matter volumes (representing myelinated axons) as a criterion for maturity, then your logic would imply a significant percentage of adults, based on brain scans, should be declared incompetent. Modern neuroscience does not allow us to predict behavior very reliably from brain maps or anatomical data available from MRI, fMRI, or PET scans.Fan of Science wrote:The neurobiology studies I have seen all state that a teenager has an undeveloped prefrontal cortex (PFC), and is also deluged with hormones, which is why violence often occurs during this age, at least among boys. I don't think the PFC fully develops until somewhere in the neighborhood of the mid-20s.
Peaks in violent behavior as a function of age do exist in empirical data, but brain development is not the only plausible explanation. In fact, some studies suggest that if properly adjusted for socio-economic status within each age group, the adolescent violent crime rates, and the rates for murder in particular, are very much the same, or even slightly lower, than those in adult men. (Google "Mike Males" and "adolescent violence" together to find more). Of course one could counter that minimum legal ages for firearm purchase result in a suppression of adolescent rates and that the "natural" rate would be higher, but if this were the explanation, there should be a pronounced spike in the rate as a function of age which is later in states with a 21 minimum age vs. an 18 minimum.) I'm not aware of any such effect, and even if there is one, it shouldn't apply to other violent crimes besides murder.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7996
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Discrimination against young people
You are only describing half of the picture. The half that youth like to think (and whine) about, namely adult Rights that they do not have access to. OTOH I never hear youth clamor for more adult Responsibilities. They are too happy to not have to provide for themselves and have stuff handed to them. Funny, isn't it?Ncole1 wrote:Why might it be permissible to have laws in place which severely curtail the freedoms of persons younger than 16 or 18, if as a matter of fact it could be shown that adult like decision making capacities develop at an earlier age? Would this not then amount to severe and oppressive age-discrimination?
Just about all the studies of decision-making in young people as well as response to social influences seem to either be inconclusive or they show that about 25% of the adult population is actually less mature than the average 13-year-old. Such age-limits as 16 or 18 thus are discriminatory, because we do not declare such a large percent of non-demented adults to be mentally incompetent.
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: May 26th, 2017, 1:39 pm
Re: Discrimination against young people
- Shanor
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 10
- Joined: April 15th, 2016, 3:40 pm
Re: Discrimination against young people
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Discrimination against young people
There are some schools where children are allowed to choose to go to class or not, and they function perfectly well. The biggest problem I feel in society is the lack of freedom given to children in the course of their education. I strongly feel that schooling should not be about teaching, but more about enabling children to explore their own interests.
If anything there is a big problem with how children are taught not to think, not to question and not to learn for themselves.
note: I am a "teacher". What is blatantly obvious to anyone who has taught is that all students differ and all students have different interests and ways to approach subjects. In society people are now aware that the "one size fits all" attitude doesn't work. In trying to cater to every individual the "one sixe fits all" attitude caters to no one because literal no one is "average". Misapplication of mathematical logic into social science AGAIN!
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Discrimination against young people
Oppression is defined asWould this not then amount to severe and oppressive age-discrimination?
I don't see too many children who are oppressed. At least not in developed countries like the UK. Oh and at least not by the state.Inflicting harsh and authoritarian treatment
Where do you teach? I live in the UK and I never once felt I was being stopped from learning anything. Granted things aren't always given to you on a plate and granted many schools could do better but teaching children not to think is the reserve of bad teachers. Good teachers encourage thought and independence. Indeed as you progress through education your own opinion becomes more and more prominent. By the time you are doing a PHD you are more or less expected to learn something new which has never been taught.Children do not get a choice in what they learn, how they can learn and who they listen to.
-
- Posts: 541
- Joined: September 23rd, 2015, 9:52 am
Re: Discrimination against young people
I'm not familiar with any studies that show PFC development peaking at 19-20. If it's underdeveloped at 17, it' still underdeveloped at 24.Fan of Science wrote:The neurobiology studies I have seen all state that a teenager has an undeveloped prefrontal cortex (PFC), and is also deluged with hormones, which is why violence often occurs during this age, at least among boys. I don't think the PFC fully develops until somewhere in the neighborhood of the mid-20s.
Happy to see any citations to contrary though. Developmental isn't my field.
-- Updated July 6th, 2017, 6:56 am to add the following --
I'm pretty sure the science _doesn't_ say that. Again, happy to see a citation though.Fan of Science wrote:The science shows that the PFC does not fully develop until the mid-20s, which leaves teenagers more dependent on emotional reactions to events, and they are ruled more by the amygdala than people are who have fully developed PFCs.
There are certainly biases in the reaction profile with teenagers, just as there are in early adulthood, late adulthood, and the elderly.
Sure, except that in Ancient Greece most of the teenagers you're talking about would be considered responsbile adults. The ancient greeks also complained that their youths didn't respect their elders, or tradition, wore their hair too long, and favoured 'girlish' music. Some things really don't change, but is this a bias in teenagers, or in adults?Fan of Science wrote:It's not just that people discovered this recently about teenagers being more irresponsible on average than adults, even the ancient Greeks knew this. Remember the story about the son who flew too high and had his wings melt? A story about teenagers being reckless and not behaving like a more mature adult would.
-- Updated July 6th, 2017, 7:02 am to add the following --
Not really. Can you think of any examples of adults clamouring for more responsibilities?LuckyR wrote:The half that youth like to think (and whine) about, namely adult Rights that they do not have access to. OTOH I never hear youth clamor for more adult Responsibilities. They are too happy to not have to provide for themselves and have stuff handed to them. Funny, isn't it?
What youth generally want is more control over their lives. Adults want the same. That's hardly unreasonable. Neither group generally worries too much about picking up the peices when it goes wrong, which is why we have to hire special people to collect stranded climbers from mountainsides, rescue swimmers and boaters from lakes and seas, enforce speed limits on roads, and deal with people when they drink too much.
-- Updated July 6th, 2017, 7:17 am to add the following --
Depends on how you look at it.Eduk wrote:Oppression is defined asWould this not then amount to severe and oppressive age-discrimination?
I don't see too many children who are oppressed. At least not in developed countries like the UK. Oh and at least not by the state.Inflicting harsh and authoritarian treatment
Children are literally given into the care of an adult, chosen for them. Most often that's their parents, but in a high precentage of cases it isn't. They can't legally protest, can't vote, have no legal voice, can't bear witness or testify, or lodge legal protest, have no financial, property or other rights, are exempt from minimum wages or workers rights, have no rights to family or children, no legal control over their own bodies, can be forced to either have or not have any operation, including an abortion, as their guardian dictates, are subject to arbitrary arrest, assault, imprisonment, search and seizure, no right to assembly, or association, can be freely descriminated against, and have the highest rate of physical and sexual abuse against them of any demographic in the country.
They are also herded daily into large institutions that have a legal duty to try and influence their thinking, attitudes and behaviour into patterns favoured by the state and their legal guardians. Those that escape are forcibly restrained and returned, repeat offenders are imprisoned.
This doesn't go far enough for some people, who want to curtail their access to information, formerly legalise physical assault against them, or campaign to hard them into forced labour camps, mostly often to train them to murder enemies of the state.
On the plus side, they get lollipops, and don't have to balance a checkbook.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7996
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Discrimination against young people
Nice try. Everyone knows adults get adult Rights along with adult Responsibilities. Under the current system, minors get reduced Rights and as it happens reduced Responsibilities. Some minors (as evidenced by this thread) want increased Rights, but "paying" for them with increased Responsibilities is never part of the discussion. I get that everyone wants a free lunch. Problem is, it doesn't exist.Togo1 wrote:Not really. Can you think of any examples of adults clamouring for more responsibilities?LuckyR wrote:The half that youth like to think (and whine) about, namely adult Rights that they do not have access to. OTOH I never hear youth clamor for more adult Responsibilities. They are too happy to not have to provide for themselves and have stuff handed to them. Funny, isn't it?
What youth generally want is more control over their lives. Adults want the same. That's hardly unreasonable. Neither group generally worries too much about picking up the peices when it goes wrong, which is why we have to hire special people to collect stranded climbers from mountainsides, rescue swimmers and boaters from lakes and seas, enforce speed limits on roads, and deal with people when they drink too much.
-
- Posts: 541
- Joined: September 23rd, 2015, 9:52 am
Re: Discrimination against young people
It is in every case I've ever looked at. Emanciapted minors, for example, social care hearings, psychological fitness evaluations, arguments over school social controls, and so on.LuckyR wrote:Nice try. Everyone knows adults get adult Rights along with adult Responsibilities. Under the current system, minors get reduced Rights and as it happens reduced Responsibilities. Some minors (as evidenced by this thread) want increased Rights, but "paying" for them with increased Responsibilities is never part of the discussion.Togo1 wrote: (Nested quote removed.)
Not really. Can you think of any examples of adults clamouring for more responsibilities?
What youth generally want is more control over their lives. Adults want the same. That's hardly unreasonable. Neither group generally worries too much about picking up the peices when it goes wrong, which is why we have to hire special people to collect stranded climbers from mountainsides, rescue swimmers and boaters from lakes and seas, enforce speed limits on roads, and deal with people when they drink too much.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7996
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Discrimination against young people
Long story, short, the current system isn't "discrimination", it's logical. You gotta pay to play, no freeloaders.Togo1 wrote:It is in every case I've ever looked at. Emanciapted minors, for example, social care hearings, psychological fitness evaluations, arguments over school social controls, and so on.LuckyR wrote: (Nested quote removed.)
Nice try. Everyone knows adults get adult Rights along with adult Responsibilities. Under the current system, minors get reduced Rights and as it happens reduced Responsibilities. Some minors (as evidenced by this thread) want increased Rights, but "paying" for them with increased Responsibilities is never part of the discussion.
-
- Posts: 541
- Joined: September 23rd, 2015, 9:52 am
Re: Discrimination against young people
That's what they used to say about Woman having the vote. The fact remains, nonetheless, that a child who wants to 'play' doesn't get a chance to pay, they just get arrested.LuckyR wrote:Long story, short, the current system isn't "discrimination", it's logical. You gotta pay to play, no freeloaders.Togo1 wrote: (Nested quote removed.)
It is in every case I've ever looked at. Emanciapted minors, for example, social care hearings, psychological fitness evaluations, arguments over school social controls, and so on.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7996
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Discrimination against young people
You are correct, alas, you and I posting doesn't change the momentum of history.Togo1 wrote:That's what they used to say about Woman having the vote. The fact remains, nonetheless, that a child who wants to 'play' doesn't get a chance to pay, they just get arrested.LuckyR wrote: (Nested quote removed.)
Long story, short, the current system isn't "discrimination", it's logical. You gotta pay to play, no freeloaders.
But from the Philosophical (not the Realistic) perspective: How much traction is your argument getting? Word of advice: if you wanna get something, offer up something.
Good luck.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023