Meritocracy
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Meritocracy
What are the advantages and disadvantages of this system? Can you provide something for both sides of an argument for and against?
- ThomasHobbes
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm
Re: Meritocracy
There is no other better system. How could there be?
But it would all depend on how to value skills for their merit. The devil is always in the detail.
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Meritocracy
Go for it then! What kind of details need looking at?ThomasHobbes wrote: ↑October 9th, 2018, 8:34 am Sounds like homework mining.
There is no other better system. How could there be?
But it would all depend on how to value skills for their merit. The devil is always in the detail.
I bring this up because I’ve seen an underlying view in some people on this forum that looks like it may offer some opposition to the idea of a meritocracy.
Note: I didn’t ask if it was the “best” or not. I asked about the advantages and disadvantages of the system.
- Consul
- Posts: 6136
- Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
- Location: Germany
Re: Meritocracy
The disadvantage is that natural endowments—innate skills or talents, mental/intellectual or physical abilities—aren't personal achievements themselves but natural gifts that aren't the result of any effort or hard work. It is sheer luck if you happen to have them, so why should people be rewarded just for having them, given that they haven't done anything to get them? There is nothing fair or just about the distribution of innate skills or talents, so how can social inequality be morally justified in terms of them?Burning ghost wrote: ↑October 9th, 2018, 4:51 am What do you think about the idea of a meritocracy?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of this system? Can you provide something for both sides of an argument for and against?
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Meritocracy
A perfect far-leftist example. Thanks.Consul wrote: ↑October 9th, 2018, 10:40 amThe disadvantage is that natural endowments—innate skills or talents, mental/intellectual or physical abilities—aren't personal achievements themselves but natural gifts that aren't the result of any effort or hard work. It is sheer luck if you happen to have them, so why should people be rewarded just for having them, given that they haven't done anything to get them? There is nothing fair or just about the distribution of innate skills or talents, so how can social inequality be morally justified in terms of them?Burning ghost wrote: ↑October 9th, 2018, 4:51 am What do you think about the idea of a meritocracy?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of this system? Can you provide something for both sides of an argument for and against?
This aside is there anything else, or rather what practical use can we make of this either for or against the principle of a meritocracy?
-
- Posts: 948
- Joined: February 16th, 2018, 11:28 am
Re: Meritocracy
Meritocracies can lead to people thinking that success is innate, somehow, around race or sex or class. It need not, but it can, depending on how the meritocracy is organized.
Is getting into a restricted university program after intensive, expensive tutoring actually based on one's merit or on the wealth of one's parents? Do we take into account the process when evaluating merit?
How are moral issues included?
This is not extensive, just some thoughts off the bat.
Why not lay out a paragraph long version of meritocracy as you envision it and then we can look at the problems and strengths from there.
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Meritocracy
Well, under a strict meritocracy wealth plays no part. I am looking at the idea under the assumption that all things being equal the better suited the person is for the position the stronger their claim is to take the position.Is getting into a restricted university program after intensive, expensive tutoring actually based on one's merit or on the wealth of one's parents?
Of course someone’s desire to be a doctor or a physicist doesn’t make them suitable for such a role - but in some roles within society it is quite clear that a certain degree of competence is required.
Demographics do tell tales about the shape of society, but I’d never go as far to say that they dictate what is and isn’t deemed as “merit”. If you failed an entry exam whilst orhers passed the exam, yet your parents were rich and paid you into the university, I don’t see how that is won by “merit” from the students perspective (although a convoluted argument could be made on behalf of the parents, buts that’s weak at best!) Equally so, some poor student being given a place in university because they fill the quota is a position that is certainly not won on merit (but at least there is a reasonable argument in the real world here because there may be untapped potential; that is a tricky judgemenr to make though and if we’re looking at meritocracy in a pure light then I’d say this is the possible failing - that is the consideration of “potential”, the slippery thing that it is!)
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15155
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Meritocracy
That was an observation and could only be considered far leftist in today's Murdochracy.Burning ghost wrote: ↑October 9th, 2018, 10:50 amA perfect far-leftist example. Thanks.Consul wrote: ↑October 9th, 2018, 10:40 am
The disadvantage is that natural endowments—innate skills or talents, mental/intellectual or physical abilities—aren't personal achievements themselves but natural gifts that aren't the result of any effort or hard work. It is sheer luck if you happen to have them, so why should people be rewarded just for having them, given that they haven't done anything to get them? There is nothing fair or just about the distribution of innate skills or talents, so how can social inequality be morally justified in terms of them?
This aside is there anything else, or rather what practical use can we make of this either for or against the principle of a meritocracy?
Whether one is in favour of it or not, is social inequality justified or just efficacious? One could point to the reduction in world poverty in relative terms over the last century or the failure of communism in Venezuela and its collapse in both Russia and China, only to be quickly revived by new dictators.
Really, if you have a society that can only be held together by repressive means then that society should ideally split into parts until each part is manageable enough not to require repression for stability. Power dynamics and economies of scale in a competitive global marketplace stand in the way of that approach, though.
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Meritocracy
What are talking about? I am asking for positives and negatives. Are you saying meritocracy is “repressive” and if so how?
- ThomasHobbes
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm
Re: Meritocracy
How would you judge the "merit" of different artists. Would you even consider art to be of any merit deserving of any reward?Burning ghost wrote: ↑October 9th, 2018, 10:28 amGo for it then! What kind of details need looking at?ThomasHobbes wrote: ↑October 9th, 2018, 8:34 am Sounds like homework mining.
There is no other better system. How could there be?
But it would all depend on how to value skills for their merit. The devil is always in the detail.
I bring this up because I’ve seen an underlying view in some people on this forum that looks like it may offer some opposition to the idea of a meritocracy.
Note: I didn’t ask if it was the “best” or not. I asked about the advantages and disadvantages of the system.
But even in professions were merit were easier to judge, such as maths - what happens when there are too many mathematicians chasing too few jobs.
How much merit would you give a plumber? You might be able to devise an objective test to find the best of them - but how would you judge their worth over, say, a carpenter?
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Meritocracy
Some positions require no great merit.
Some positions can be judged on merit better than others. Doctors on the whole belong to a meritocracy. But of course it is far from perfect.
Ultimately life is a meritocracy.
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Meritocracy
You’ve lost me? A meritocracy means to judge by ability/competence. Are you asking how a fair “judgment” is made over what is deemed “competent”?
An artist, plumber or runner is given merit based on their ability/competence. We have tests and school to improve and nurture people’s abilities/competence.
That measuring is a problem is certainly a flaw embedded within the practical application of a meritocracy. I don’t see how it can be seen as a negative though because the premise is simply to reward people, to allow them more influence, in some given area if (and only if) they excel in it.
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Meritocracy
I wouldn’t go quite that far. It is true enough to say that some people are better at governing than others. The issue is more about “cometh the moment, cometh the man,” because the best person for the job today may be the worst person for the job tomorrow.Some positions can't be tested for merit. For example we have no way to test for merit when selecting government.
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Meritocracy
I could perhaps prove it to my satisfaction. But my satisfaction absolutely will be at odds with probably billions of other people.
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Meritocracy
So short version is that I can't judge the merit of a plumber. Plumbing is a very specific job with a very specific output.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023