Gun Control and Mass Murder

Have philosophical discussions about politics, law, and government.
Featured Article: Definition of Freedom - What Freedom Means to Me
Post Reply
User avatar
Rederic
Posts: 589
Joined: May 30th, 2012, 8:26 am
Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell
Location: South coast of England

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by Rederic »

Are you against gun control?
Religion is at its best when it makes us ask hard questions of ourselves.
It is at its worst when it deludes us into thinking we have all the answers for everybody else.
Archibald Macleish.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by Steve3007 »

Now that the US has a president who is willing to stand up for second amendment rights is it finally time for elementary school teachers and students to be given the means to exercise their god given right to self defence? Shouldn't they all be carrying hand guns to school?
Fooloso4
Posts: 3601
Joined: February 28th, 2014, 4:50 pm

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by Fooloso4 »

Steve3007:
Now that the US has a president who is willing to stand up for second amendment rights is it finally time for elementary school teachers and students to be given the means to exercise their god given right to self defence? Shouldn't they all be carrying hand guns to school?
Of course! As secretary of education Betty DeVos said, guns do have a place in schools do to the threat of grizzly bears (she actually did say this).

There is a bill in my state that would allow judges to is issue an “extreme risk protective order” in order to take guns way from those deemed a threat to themselves or others. Of course the NRA is opposed, after all, we wouldn’t want to take away anyone’s right to own a gun.
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by GE Morton »

Fooloso4 wrote:
There is a bill in my state that would allow judges to is issue an “extreme risk protective order” in order to take guns way from those deemed a threat to themselves or others. Of course the NRA is opposed, after all, we wouldn’t want to take away anyone’s right to own a gun.
Deemed by whom? Based upon what evidence, and per what process?
Fooloso4
Posts: 3601
Joined: February 28th, 2014, 4:50 pm

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by Fooloso4 »

GE Morton:
Deemed by whom?
A judge.
Based upon what evidence …
That would depend on the case.
… and per what process?
I do not know the specifics.
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by GE Morton »

Fooloso4 wrote:
… and per what process?
I do not know the specifics.
The 5th Amendment declares that ". . . no person . . . shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law . . . "

"Due process of law" means, conviction of a crime by a jury, consistently with all provisions of the 5th and 6th Amendments. The right to keep and bear arms is a constitutional liberty right. Hence any process which does not satisfy those provisions if not "due process."
Fooloso4
Posts: 3601
Joined: February 28th, 2014, 4:50 pm

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by Fooloso4 »

From Wiki (emphasis added):
Due process is the legal requirement that the state must respect all legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due process violation, which offends the rule of law.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution each contain a Due Process Clause. Due process deals with the administration of justice and thus the Due Process Clause acts as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the Government outside the sanction of law. The Supreme Court of the United States interprets the Clauses as providing four protections: procedural due process (in civil and criminal proceedings), substantive due process, a prohibition against vague laws, and as the vehicle for the incorporation of the Bill of Rights.
Taking someone’s gun in such a situation does not cause harm and is not an arbitrary action. It does not violate due process.
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by GE Morton »

Fooloso4 wrote:
Taking someone’s gun in such a situation does not cause harm and is not an arbitrary action. It does not violate due process.
Of course it causes harm. Any restriction of liberty, and any confiscation of property, are harms. Suppose the government forbid someone to own, say, a television, or a bicycle. Would those be harms? What if someone stole your gun, or your television or your bicycle --- would those be harms? May the police refuse to investigate those thefts or prosecute the thieves, on the ground that "no harm was done"?

You might pay more attention to the "substantive due process" mentioned in the article you quoted. Denying someone a right expressly protected by the Constitution, except as punishment for a crime, is a ]prima facie violation of substantive due process.
Fooloso4
Posts: 3601
Joined: February 28th, 2014, 4:50 pm

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by Fooloso4 »

GE Morton:
Of course it causes harm. Any restriction of liberty, and any confiscation of property, are harms.
Good point. I will rephrase it: it is a matter of greater and lesser harms. If I owned a gun and my wife or child have noticed that my behavior had become erratic, or I seemed depressed and/or agitated, If something about me causes them to be concerned and think I might be a danger to myself or someone else, what harm would come to me if I no longer had access to guns until my condition was evaluated? How does this harm weigh against the harm to lives that may be at risk?
Substantive due process, in United States constitutional law, is a principle allowing courts to protect certain rights deemed fundamental from government interference
But it is the court not the state that makes the determination that a particular person is a danger and should not be allowed to own guns.
User avatar
-1-
Posts: 878
Joined: December 1st, 2016, 2:23 am

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by -1- »

"if you outlaw the guns only the outlaws will have guns"

Well, there you go. If you want a gunless society, first extract the guns from the outlaws' possessions; only the inlaws will have guns then; which can be surrendered by the inlaws peacefully, since the outlaws don't have any any more, so no need to return fire power to save one's own life.

This is easier said than done. But if we all work together as a team, toward the common goal of de-gunning the nation in order to prevent mass murder by firepower, then maybe we should think about de-gunning the outlaws.

How does one define an outlaw? Well, the originator of the quote knows. Let's ask him or her.

Failing that, a simple measure could be established: "Anyone who possesses a gun and is not a member of the armed forces or of the police, or of accredited policing forces, is an outlaw." Bang, the nation is de-gunned.

What about that pesky second amendment? Well, if you research law, you will find many useless amendments. Persecution of witches and witchcraft is in one of the amendments-- need I extoll the shtupidity of that? Or the criminalization of suicide. Poor saps, who commit suicide, they have enough anguish and agony on their plate to worry about, why top it off with the incredibly strong social pressure by declaring them non-Christians and evil if they commit suicide? And the entire ensuing euthanasia thing, which is commonly debated. Or the right or no-right to abortion... it stems from the fact that an unborn baby has a soul, and it's not Christian until it gets Baptized, so many Christians feel it displeases or displeasures God to abort unborn feti... a good solution to that would be practice to Baptize babies before they are out of there, but the Church won't sanction that... I can't see why not, it's not in the scriptures explicitly to restrict Baptism only to those who are out of the hole. Baptism is the simple act of washing off the original sin by a priest or preacher... why wait until the baby leaves the womb? Wash then those g----d babies in-vitro. Because God only knows, many anti-abortion agents support the death penalty... where is the logic in that? Either ban abortions, ban the death penalty, and ban public gun ownership at the same time, or else reestablish the death penalty and allow abortions and gun ownership... but be consistent, for Christ's sake. Christ likes logically consistent behaviour. Always has.
This search engine is powered by Hunger, Thirst, and a desperate need to Mate.
User avatar
Rederic
Posts: 589
Joined: May 30th, 2012, 8:26 am
Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell
Location: South coast of England

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by Rederic »

Here we go again. The NRA constantly tries to change the narrative. The topic is gun control, not the banning of guns. Why are you people so against trying to control gun ownership?

If it makes you safer, why are you against it?

Talk about voting against your own self interest!
Religion is at its best when it makes us ask hard questions of ourselves.
It is at its worst when it deludes us into thinking we have all the answers for everybody else.
Archibald Macleish.
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by GE Morton »

Fooloso4 wrote:
But it is the court not the state that makes the determination that a particular person is a danger and should not be allowed to own guns.
Ah. Since a judge has decided Alfie there is a danger, should he also be forbidden to leave his house? Or to possess knives, tire irons, or baseball bats? Perhaps he should just be preemptively locked up; that should assure he doesn't hurt anybody.

The only reliable evidence that Alfie is a danger is that he has previously committed a crime, for which he was convicted. Any other "evidence" is nothing more than guesswork.

Do you really want to empower judges to nullify your constitutional rights because of something someone claims you might do?
Fooloso4
Posts: 3601
Joined: February 28th, 2014, 4:50 pm

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by Fooloso4 »

GE Morton:
The only reliable evidence that Alfie is a danger is that he has previously committed a crime, for which he was convicted. Any other "evidence" is nothing more than guesswork.
It is up to the judge in each individual case to use his or her own judgment to determine whether the potential risk of guessing wrong outweighs the benefit of guessing right.
Do you really want to empower judges to nullify your constitutional rights because of something someone claims you might do?
It is not a matter of nullify your constitutional rights, it is a question of whether a particular right, the right to own a gun is sacrosanct. I do not think it is. There are situations in which an individual’s rights may be curtailed with probable cause, and this is one of them. Any other case would have to be based on its own merits.
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by Felix »

GE Morton: The only reliable evidence that Alfie is a danger is that he has previously committed a crime, for which he was convicted. Any other "evidence" is nothing more than guesswork.
So you consider professional psychiatric evaluations to be "guesswork"?
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Gun Control and Mass Murder

Post by GE Morton »

Felix wrote:
GE Morton: The only reliable evidence that Alfie is a danger is that he has previously committed a crime, for which he was convicted. Any other "evidence" is nothing more than guesswork.
So you consider professional psychiatric evaluations to be "guesswork"?
It is nothing but guesswork. There are as many schools, and theories, of psychology as there are religions. It is (roughly) 20% science, 80% speculation, with a generous dollop of ideology.

-- Updated April 12th, 2017, 11:01 pm to add the following --
Fooloso4 wrote:
It is up to the judge in each individual case to use his or her own judgment to determine whether the potential risk of guessing wrong outweighs the benefit of guessing right.
So apparently you are willing to hinge constitutional rights on guesswork. The question remains: If the judge decides, based on guesswork, that Alfie is a danger to the public, why not just preemptively lock him up? What principle allows the former, but forbids the latter?
It is not a matter of nullify your constitutional rights, it is a question of whether a particular right, the right to own a gun is sacrosanct. I do not think it is. There are situations in which an individual’s rights may be curtailed with probable cause, and this is one of them.
Methinks you don't understand what "probable cause" means. It means that there is reason to believe a a crime has been committed, and that Alfie was involved in it. It does not mean that it is probable that Alfie will commit a crime.

Is the right of free speech sacrosanct? The right to practice religion? The right to counsel if accused of a crime? Or is the right to keep and bear arms some sort of "second class" right, in your view?
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Politics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021